Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 32 issue 2 (june 2009) : 79-85

GENETIC DIVERGENCE, ADAPTABILITY AND GENOTYPIC RESPONSE TO YMV IN BLACKGRAM

Saikat Gantait*, Prakash Kanti Das
1Department of Biotechnology, Instrumentation and Environmental Science, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya., Mohanpur-741252, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gantait* Saikat, Das Kanti Prakash (2024). GENETIC DIVERGENCE, ADAPTABILITY AND GENOTYPIC RESPONSE TO YMV IN BLACKGRAM. Legume Research. 32(2): 79-85. doi: .

ABSTRACT

D2 analysis showed that the cluster number and compositions varied in different environments.
Only few were most stable divergent genotypes. Geographic distribution not exclusively determined
cluster composition. The adaptability analysis showed that some genotypes recorded general
adaptation, whereas other adapted to favorable or adverse environment. No close relation between
genetic divergence and adaptation was observed. Genotypic response to YMV attack under field
condition during Pre-kharif based on progress of infection between plants and within plants confirmed
that stable divergent genotypes with either general adaptation or specific adaptation (favorable or
adverse) not always exhibited high level of field tolerance to YMV. It was suggested that genotypic
control would seem to be the potent factor in determining level of tolerance to YMV.

REFERENCES

  1. Basak, J. et al. (2004) Molecular Breeding., 14:375-383
  2. Becker, H.C. and Leen, J. (1988) Pl. Breed., 101:1-23
  3. Bhatt, G.M. (1973) Aust. J. Agric. Res., 24:457-464
  4. Vol. 32, No. 2, 2009 85
  5. Dasgupta, T. and Das, P.K. (1991) Indian Agric. Res., 25:7-13
  6. Eberhart, S.A. and Russel, W.A. (1966) Crop Sci., 6:36-40
  7. Hazra, P., et al. (1993) Indian J. Genet., 53:418-423
  8. Jatasra, D.S. and Paroda, R.S. (1978) Cereal Res. Comm., 6:307-317
  9. Krishnareddy, M. (1989) PhD Thesis. Post Graduate School, Indian Agric. Res. Inst, New Delhi :263
  10. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936) Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India, 2:49-55
  11. Murty, B.R. and Arunachalam, V. (1966) Indian J. Genet., 36:379-383
  12. Nene, Y.L. (1973) Indian J Agric Sci, 43:541-546
  13. Paria, M.B., et al (1997) Gujarat Agric. Univ. Res. J., 22:13-17
  14. Rao, C.R. (1952) Advance Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. John Wiley and Sons., New York.
  15. Verma, A.et al. (1991) Yellow Mosaic Disease, pp. 8-19
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)