volume 33 issue 2 (june 2010) : 87 - 94

INTERRELATIONSHIP AND PATH ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT CHARACTERS UNDER EIGHT ENVIRONMENTS IN PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

S

Sudhir Kumar Dhama

N

Neeraj Kumar Tyagi*

P

P.B.Singh**

Affiliations

¹Basmati Export Development Foundation, SVBUA&T Campus, Modipuram Meerut – 250 110, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Dhama Kumar Sudhir, Tyagi* Kumar Neeraj, P.B.Singh** (2025). INTERRELATIONSHIP AND PATH ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT CHARACTERS UNDER EIGHT ENVIRONMENTS IN PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.). Legume Research. 33(2): 87 - 94. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted to determine the character associations and their mode of direct
and indirect effect on grain yield in 30 genotypes of pea to pick up the best character contribution
under irrigated and rainfed environments. The value of genotypic correlations was higher than
phenotypic correlations for all the characters in all the environments. Number of pods per plant
exhibited significant and positive association with seed yield per plant in all the environments.
Seed yield was significantly and positively associated with protein content at genotypic level in
E5. Protein content exhibited negative and significant correlation with pod length and number
of nodules in E2 and E4 and with number of seed and 100 seed weight in E6. The plant height
had the positive values of direct effects from 0.104 to 0.008 in E3 and E2, respectively. The
direct effect of number of seeds per plant on grain yield was observed to be low and positive
under E7 and E8 and negative under E1, E2, E3, E4, E5 and E6. The characters like biological
yield at phenotypic level had positive correlation with seed yield and its direct effect was positive
would be attributed by the direct effects of others yield contributing characters

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Chaudhary, D.K. and Sharma, R.R. (2003). Indian J. Horti. 60(3): 251-256.
Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agro. J., 51:515-518.
Johnson, H.W. et al. (1955). Agric. J. 47: 314-318.
Kumar, B.et al. (2003). Progr. Agri. 3(1-2): 141-142.
McPhee, K. (2003). Food, Agri. Environ. 1 (1): 64-69.
Sharma, A.K. et al. (2003). Crop Research. Hissar. 26 (1): 135-139.
Singh, D. and Mishra, V.K. (2002). Legume Res. 25(1): 44-46.
Singh, J.D. and Singh, I.P. (2006). Legume Res. 29 (1): 65-67.
Singh, S.K. et al. (1998). Crop Improv. 25(10): 139-140.
Singh, S.P. et al. (1985).. Crop Impro. 12(10): 64-67.
Sirohi, S.P.S. et al. (2006). Plant Archives. 6(2): 737-740.
Togay, N. et al. (2008).African J. Biotechnol. 7(23): 4285-4287.
Ulukan, H. et al. (2003). Pak. J. Biol. Sci ., 6(23): 1951-1955

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

INTERRELATIONSHIP AND PATH ANALYSIS FOR SEED YIELD AND ITS COMPONENT CHARACTERS UNDER EIGHT ENVIRONMENTS IN PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board