GC-MS profiling of the methanolic extract of Z. propinquum
GC-MS analysis revealed three non-silylated compounds that were retained as tentative assignments after conservative re-evaluation of the chromatographic profile and exclusion of siloxane-related artifacts, silylated assignments and other analytically implausible signals. These compounds were n-undecane (RT 11.395 min), methyl hexadecanoate (RT 32.157 min) and methyl stearate (RT 35.949 min). Their relative peak areas were 0.41%, 0.83% and 0.70%, respectively, based on the total integrated chromatographic peak area before artifact exclusion. The hydrocarbon n-undecane was distinguished from methyl hexadecanoate and methyl stearate, which were classified as fatty acid methyl esters. The retention times, peak areas, molecular characteristics and identification status of the retained compounds are summarized in Table 1 and the total ion chromatogram is presented in Fig 1.
Compound assignments are considered tentative because authentic reference standards were not analyzed. Siloxane-related peaks and silylated assignments were excluded during re-evaluation of the chromatogram. Assignments reported by the spectral library as TMS/TBDMS derivatives were excluded because no derivatization procedure was performed on the sample. Library match-score values and experimental retention indices were not available from the original analysis and therefore were not retrospectively assigned or reported.
Total flavonoid and total phenolic contents
The methanolic extract of
Z. propinquum was analyzed spectrophotometrically for total flavonoid and total phenolic contents (Fig 2). Total flavonoid content was 1.91±0.04 mg QE/g dry extract, whereas total phenolic content was 1.98±0.07 mg GAE/g dry extract. Values represent mean±SD of triplicate measurements (n = 3).
Cytotoxicity against MCF-7 (Breast cancer)
The effect of the methanolic extract of
Z. propinquum on MCF-7 cell viability was evaluated using the MTT assay. As shown in Fig 3, cell viability showed a modest concentration-dependent decrease after 24 h of exposure. The cell viability was 100.00±3.33% in the untreated control and 100.63± 2.84, 90.34±4.46, 85.49±2.07, 83.43±1.87, 82.26±2.43, 80.27±1.29 and 71.40±3.00% at 15.6, 31.2, 62.5, 125, 250, 500 and 1000 µg/mL, respectively (n = 3). Cell viability was calculated relative to the untreated control using the following formula:
Where,
A treated and A control= The absorbance of treated extract and untreated control cells, respectively.
The cell viability decreased with an increase in the extract concentration, but at the highest tested concentration of 1000 µg/mL, the cell viability was 71.40± 3.00%. Thus, 50% viability was not reached in the experimentally tested range and the IC
50 is reported as >1000 µg/mL.
Surrogate anthelmintic screening and histopathological evaluation
Paralysis and mortality of
E. fetida were evaluated as exploratory time-to-event outcomes, with five worm-level observations per treatment condition in Fig 4 and 5. The higher ZPPE concentration was associated with markedly shorter event times. At 100 mg/mL, the mean time to paralysis was 26.50±2.75 min (median, 26.20 min) and the mean time to mortality was 29.06±3.36 min (median, 28.50 min). At 200 mg/mL, the corresponding times were 7.70±1.80 min (median, 8.32 min) for paralysis and 9.19±1.66 min (median, 9.34 min) for mortality. Mebendazole (10 mg/mL) produced the shortest event times, with paralysis occurring at 4.00±2.10 min (median, 4.52 min) and mortality at 5.31±2.12 min (median, 6.28 min). No paralysis or mortality occurred in the distilled-water control group during the 33.40-min observation period. therefore, these observations were right-censored at 33.40 min.
Descriptively, the higher extract concentration showed shorter observed paralysis and mortality times than the lower concentration, whereas mebendazole showed the shortest event times. The median paralysis and mortality times at 200 mg/mL were 17.88 and 19.16 min shorter, respectively, than at 100 mg/mL. Compared with ZPPE at 200 mg/mL, mebendazole showed median paralysis and mortality times that were 3.80 and 3.06 min shorter, respectively. Because the five worms within each condition were exposed together in a single vessel, these between-condition differences are presented descriptively and were not subjected to inferential statistical testing.These findings show an observed concentration-related pattern of ZPPE in the
E. fetida surrogate model, while mebendazole showed the more rapidly occurring responses under the present experimental conditions.
Qualitative histological examination of the mid-body region showed distinct morphological differences among the examined groups (Fig 6). Sections from distilled-water control worms showed an intact cuticle and relatively well-organized underlying muscular layers. In worms exposed to ZPPE at 200 mg/mL, visible disruption and deformation of the cuticular and muscular architecture were observed. Mebendazole-treated worms showed more marked disruption of cuticular and muscular organization. These observations were interpreted descriptively because no quantitative histological scoring, morphometric measurement, or image-analysis procedure was performed. Accordingly, the histological findings provide qualitative evidence of treatment-associated structural alterations in the
E. fetida body wall but should not be interpreted as quantitative evidence of tissue-damage severity.
The present study provides an exploratory chemical and biological characterization of the methanolic leaf extract of
Z. propinquum. Particular emphasis was placed on conservative interpretation of the GC-MS profile, quantitative determination of total phenolic and flavonoid contents, assessment of MCF-7 cell viability and evaluation of biological effects in the free-living annelid
E. fetida as a surrogate worm model. The findings should therefore be interpreted as preliminary rather than as evidence of therapeutic anticancer or anthelmintic efficacy.
Following conservative re-evaluation of the GC-MS chromatogram, only three non-silylated compounds were retained as tentative library-based assignments: n-undecane, methyl hexadecanoate and methyl stearate. Their relative peak areas were 0.41%, 0.83% and 0.70%, respectively, corresponding collectively to approximately 1.94% of the total integrated chromatographic peak area before artifact exclusion. Methyl hexadecanoate and methyl stearate are fatty acid methyl esters, whereas n-undecane is a hydrocarbon. Fatty-acid derivatives have previously been reported in phytochemical investigations of Zygophyllum species, supporting the general plausibility of this chemical class in the genus. However, because authentic reference standards were not analyzed and experimental retention indices and library match scores were unavailable, the present GC-MS assignments should be regarded as tentative rather than definitive identifications. Accordingly, no biological activity is attributed specifically to any of these individual compounds.
The methanolic extract contained measurable total phenolic and flavonoid constituents, with values of 1.98± 0.07 mg GAE/g dry extract and 1.91±0.04 mg QE/g dry extract, respectively in Fig 2. Phenolic and flavonoid compounds are widely reported in Zygophyllum species and have been associated with diverse biological activities
(Shawky et al., 2019). Nevertheless, the concentrations observed in the present study were substantially lower than those reported for some other
Zygophyllum species. For example,
Albarakaty et al., (2025) reported 156.15 mg GAE/g dry extract and 18.5 mg QE/g dry extract for Zygophyllum coccineum, whereas
Touaibia and Abdellali (2025) reported 183.22 mg GAE/g and 101.13 mg QE/g for methanolic extracts of
Zygophyllum cornutum leaves. Such differences may reflect species-specific composition as well as differences in plant material, extraction procedures, analytical conditions and calibration methods. Therefore, the present TPC and TFC values are best interpreted as quantitative measures of the tested
Z. propinquum extract rather than as evidence of a particularly high phenolic or flavonoid content.
In the MTT assay,
Z. propinquum extract produced a modest concentration-dependent reduction in MCF-7 cell viability over the tested range. Cell viability remained 71.40 ±3.00% at the highest concentration of 1000 µg/mL and 50% viability was not reached. Consequently, a numerical IC
50 value could not be determined within the experimental range and was conservatively reported as >1000 µg/mL. These findings indicate a measurable effect on MCF-7 cell viability but do not establish potent cytotoxic or anticancer activity. Because the MTT assay provides an indirect measure of cellular metabolic activity, the observed reduction in viability cannot by itself establish apoptosis, necrosis, cell-cycle arrest, or any specific mechanism of cell death. Studies of other medicinal-plant extracts have reported associations between phytochemical composition and effects on cancer-cell viability
(Aziz et al., 2024; Almarfadi et al., 2022); however, the present study does not establish which constituents, if any, are responsible for the observed MCF-7 response. In addition, selectivity toward malignant versus non-malignant cells was not established. Further studies using fractionated extracts, isolated compounds, additional cancer-cell models and appropriate non-malignant cell controls would therefore be required before any anticancer relevance could be inferred.
The use of
E. fetida in the present study was intended to provide a preliminary free-living annelid model with readily observable paralysis and mortality endpoints. Descriptive time-to-event patterns showed shorter observed paralysis and mortality times at 200 mg/mL than at 100 mg/mL, whereas mebendazole showed the shortest event times. Because each treatment condition was represented by a single shared exposure vessel containing five worms, these between-condition differences are interpreted descriptively rather than inferentially. The distilled- water control worms remained free of paralysis and mortality throughout the 33.40-min observation period and were therefore treated as right-censored observations rather than being assigned an artificial event time of zero.
The concentration-related response observed in
E. fetida is broadly consistent with previous studies in which plant extracts produced dose-dependent effects on worm motility and survival. For example,
Bazán et al. (2025) reported paralysis and mortality in
E. fetida following exposure to methanolic extracts of Campomanesia species. Direct potency comparisons among plant extracts should nevertheless be made cautiously because the species examined, extraction procedures, concentrations, formulations and experimental conditions differ substantially among studies. Importantly,
E. fetida is a free-living annelid and not a parasitic helminth. The present findings therefore demonstrate biological activity only within this surrogate model and cannot establish efficacy against parasitic worms or predict therapeutic effectiveness in infected hosts. Although tannins and saponins have been reported in other Zygophyllum species, neither class was quantified or identified in the present extract. Accordingly, potential roles of these or other constituents in enzyme inhibition, altered membrane permeability, oxidative damage, tubulin interactions, or other mechanisms remain untested hypotheses that require targeted chemical and mechanistic investigation.
Qualitative histological examination provided complementary morphological observations. Distilled-water control worms showed an intact cuticle and organized underlying muscle layers, whereas worms exposed to ZPPE at 200 mg/mL showed visible disruption and deformation of cuticular and muscular architecture. Mebendazole-treated worms showed more marked disruption of the same structures. Because the histological assessment was qualitative and no morphometric measurements, quantitative image analysis, or numerical scoring system were applied, these observations should not be interpreted as quantitative evidence of tissue-damage severity or as proof of a specific mechanism of action. Instead, they provide descriptive evidence of treatment-associated structural alterations in the
E. fetida body wall.
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the present findings. GC-MS profiling was based on a single analytical determination and compound assignments were tentative because authentic standards, experimental retention indices and library match scores were unavailable. The MCF-7 experiment did not establish a numerical IC
50 within the tested concentration range or demonstrate selectivity relative to non-malignant cells. The absence of documented vehicle-only and positive cytotoxicity controls, together with the lack of a non-malignant cell comparator, further limits interpretation of the MCF-7 findings. The
E. fetida assay used a single shared exposure vessel per treatment condition containing five worms; therefore, independent treatment-level replication was not available and the worm findings are descriptive and exploratory. The assay also represents a surrogate rather than a parasitic helminth model and worm body weight was not recorded in the original experimental records.
Histological observations were qualitative and were performed on selected treatment groups rather than constituting a quantitative dose-response assessment. These limitations emphasize the exploratory nature of the study and the need for additional chemical confirmation, bioactivity-guided fractionation, validated parasitic-helminth models and more comprehensive cellular and mechanistic studies.