GC-MS analysis of the
Chlorella extract identified phytochemicals, including fatty acids, hydrocarbons, phenolics, terpenes and their derivatives (Fig 1). The major phytochemical components of
Chorella extract are high-oleic algal oil, fatty acids and their derivatives (including arachidic, palmitic, oleic and linolenic) (Table 1).
This confirms that
Chlorella’s commercial dietary supplement is as rich in fatty acids as cultivated (
Pantami et al., 2020). The main phytochemicals in
Chorella extract include trimethylsilyl palmitate (20.22%), oleic acid (9.87%), oleic acid trimethylsilyl ester (6.25%), arachidic acid methyl ester (6.12%), linoleoyl chloride (5.81%), monopalmitin (5.80%), 3Beta-hydroxy-5-cholestene 3-oleate (3.64%) and Algal oil (3.36%) (Table 1).
Pantami et al., (2020) reported that
C. vulgaris extract contains over 60% fatty acids, rich in omega-6, -7, -9 and -13, with omega-6 (notably 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, Linoleic acid at 35.1%) being predominant, as determined through GC-MS analysis. Consequently,
Chlorella species may serve as a valuable nutritional source when added to diets, highlighting its potential as an outstanding dietary supplement.
The study found that trimethylsilyl palmitate, a palmitic acid ester, is the main component, comprising 20.22% of the extract. This ester exhibits various effects, including antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic, nematicidal, hemolytic, 5-alpha-reductase inhibition, antipsychotic, anti-androgenic and anticancer activities (
El-Fayoumy et al., 2021). Next are Oleic acid (9.87%) and its derivative (6.25%), which play beneficial roles in diseases such as coronary heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis and cancer
(Piccinin et al., 2019). Arachidic acid methyl ester (6.12%) exhibits antifungal and antioxidant properties
(Abdelillah et al., 2013) and helps prevent cholesterol gallstones by acting as a cholesterol solubilizer
(Gilat et al., 2001). Phenolics in
Chlorella sp. combat reactive oxygen and singlet oxygen species and decrease ROS production
(Pradhan et al., 2021).
Chlorella extract exhibits antimicrobial effects against Gram-negative bacteria,
E. coli and Gram-positive bacteria,
E. faecalis, S. aureus and
B. cereus, as well as the fungus
Candida albicans. Its MIC and MBC are over 1000 μg/mL, but it’s less potent than Ciprofloxacin (Table 2). As previously reported, MIC values for antibiotics range from 0.01 to 10 µg/mL, whereas plant extracts are considered antimicrobials if their MICs fall between 100 and 1000 µg/mL
(Silva et al., 2013). This large gap between the antibiotic and the natural extract used could be attributed to several factors. The difference in their nature, solubility and size. Using a crude extract is less effective than using a single, isolated compound (
Ben-Khalifa et al., 2021).
The current findings align with previous research reporting
Chlorella sp.’s antibacterial effects against Gram-positive bacteria,
S. epidermidis,
S. aureus,
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA),
E. faecalis and
B. thuringiensis, as well as Gram-negative bacteria,
E. coli,
S. sonnei and
S. marcescens (
Shaima et al., 2022). They have reported that the inhibition zones ranged from 11 to 13.8 mm, with MIC values of 0.39-6.25 mg/mL. Additionally, antibiotics demonstrated stronger bacterial inhibition across various strains. The antimicrobial activity of
Chlorella sp. is primarily attributed to its phytochemicals, especially polyphenols, which promote hydrogen peroxide production under aerobic conditions and are linked to hydroxyl groups (
Dell’Anno et al., 2019).
Various chemical groups, such as phlorotannins, fatty acids, peptides, terpenes and polysaccharides, have been found to inhibit bacterial growth in algae. Nonetheless, the exact mechanisms behind this inhibition remain unclear (
Shannon and Abu-Ghannam, 2016). Algal free fatty acids inhibit the bacterial electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation, disrupting ATP transfer. They inhibit enzymes like bacterial enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase, crucial for fatty acid synthesis, causing cell lysis and degradation from peroxidation and auto-oxidation
(Pradhan et al., 2014). Algal and sulfated polysaccharides interact with glycoprotein receptors, bind to bacterial walls, membranes and DNA and increase permeability, causing protein leakage and DNA binding (
Pereira and Valado, 2025). Amphipathic peptides bind to polar and nonpolar membrane regions, disrupting bacterial processes and replication
(Nguyen et al., 2011). All proposed antimicrobial mechanisms of algae are outlined in Fig 2.
HCC is among the most prevalent primary liver cancers and ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide
(Mustafa et al., 2023). Results shown in Fig 3 indicate that
Chlorella demonstrated a dose-dependent anticancer effect from 0.01 to 100 μg/mL. After 72 hours, cell viability was significantly reduced, with an IC50 exceeding 100 μg/mL, suggesting relatively lower cytotoxicity than cisplatin. These findings align with
Shanab et al., (2012), who reported the anticancer potential of aqueous
Chlorella extract against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma cells and HepG2 cells at 100 μg/mL.
Chlorella’s anticancer effects are attributed to polar compounds such as phycobilins, phenolics and polysaccharides that induce apoptosis (
Aboul-Enein et al., 2011). Oleic acid in
Chlorella promotes apoptosis and differentiation in colorectal HT-29 cells
(Llor et al., 2003) and decreases Her-2/neu expression in breast cancer cells
(Menendez et al., 2005). Studies show
Chlorella sp. has anticancer effects by activating apoptosis through increased P53, Bax and caspase-3, decreased Bcl-2 and suppressed AKT/mTOR pathways, causing DNA damage and apoptosis
(Sawasdee et al., 2023).
Seven phytocomponents-trimethylsilyl palmitate; oleic acid; oleic acid trimethylsilyl ester; arachidic acid methyl ester (methyl arachidate); linoleic acid chloride (linoleoyl chloride); 2,3-Dihydroxypropyl hexadecanoate (monopalmitin) and 3Beta-hydroxy-5-cholestene 3-oleate (cholesteryl oleate)-were examined for Caspase-9 docking studies. Tables 3-6 present data on the pharmacokinetics, physicochemical properties, medicinal chemistry and drug-likeness of these compounds. Linoleoyl chloride was omitted because its calculated parameters were unavailable. Cholesteryl oleate does not meet Lipinski’s rules, with two violations: MW>500 and MLOGP>4.15. Only methyl arachidate and monopalmitin were selected for Caspase-9 docking because they meet these criteria, which indicate potential drug-like properties and lower toxicity, with a predicted LD
50 of 5000 mg/kg. Both are expected to be non-mutagenic, non-tumorigenic and non-irritant. Methyl arachidate is highly lipophilic, resulting in low gastrointestinal absorption and limited blood-brain barrier permeability, whereas monopalmitin is less lipophilic, with good gastrointestinal absorption and blood-brain barrier permeability. These two compounds were docked into the Caspase-9 chain A docking pocket, replacing the co-crystallized ligand (Malate), with a binding affinity of -4.5 kcal/mol.
Based on the data in Fig 4 and Table 7, methyl arachidate appears more stable within the docking site, forming three hydrophobic contacts and two hydrogen bonds with the receptor protein. In contrast, monopalmitin forms two hydrophobic interactions and three hydrogen bonds. Methyl arachidate interacts with caspase-9 at residues TRP (chain A):354, ARGA:355, PROA:357 and makes two hydrogen bonds at ARGA: 180 and ARGA: 355. Meanwhile, monopalmitin interacts with caspase-9 at VALA: 352, TRPA:354 and forms three hydrogen bonds at ARGA: 355 amino acids of the active pocket.
Molecular docking of p53, caspase-9 and cyclin D1, which play roles in apoptosis and cell proliferation, is a target for inducing apoptosis in the MCF-7 breast cancer cells
(Nurhayati et al., 2022) and HepG2 liver carcinoma cells
(Anand et al., 2020). In silico and docking results indicate that methyl arachidate may inhibit caspase-9 and could serve as a promising liver anticancer agent. Our findings align with
Mustafa et al., (2023), who docked the phytochemicals limonin and obamegine with caspase-9. Limonin interacted with amino acids ArgA:355, TrpA:354, GlyA:238, ArgA:178 and LeuA:177 at the active site. Obamegine bound to ProA:338, ProA:336, LeuA:335, AsnA:265, PheA:246 and LeuA:244 within the binding pocket. Additionally,
Siddiqui et al., (2021) docked eight
Moringa oleifera phytochemicals with caspase-3, where benzyl glucosinolate (binding affinity -8.4 kcal/mol) interacted with Phe265, Phe250, Arg207, Trp206, Tyr204 and Thr62.
Suganya and Anuradha (2019) also docked astaxanthin, which interacted with amino acids Ile403, Cys402, Met400, Tyr397, Ile396, Phe351 and Phe348 of caspase-9.
Our findings agree with
Wanandi et al., (2020), who studied the anti-cancer potential of a natural compound by examining its interactions with survivin, caspase-9 and caspase-3 via computational methods. In 2023,
Mustafa et al. (2023) docked plant phytochemicals-liquoric acid (-9.8 kcal/mol), madecassic acid (-9.3 kcal/mol), limonin (-10.5 kcal/mol) and obamegine (-9.3 kcal/mol)-against EGFR and caspase-9. However, the molecular mechanisms behind HCC development, progression and metastasis are not well understood. In the current
in silico analysis, we targeted caspase-9, a protease that triggers apoptosis via the intrinsic or mitochondrial pathway and is activated at sites involving multiple proteins
(Kim et al., 2015). Extracellular signal-regulated kinases-1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are part of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase superfamily and regulate cell proliferation and survival. They inhibit apoptosis by deactivating proapoptotic proteins and supporting cell survival by blocking caspase-9 activity
(Boston et al., 2011). Natural chemicals targeting caspase-9 could be promising for HCC treatment. Microalgae are rich in biocompatible compounds, making them valuable nutraceuticals
(Sawasdee et al., 2023; Yu et al., 2024). Their phytochemicals may serve as future drug candidates against HCC.