Body mass, RMR and body composition
The body mass was significantly influenced by region and fasting (Region: F
1,30=5.208, P=0.03; Fasting: F
2,30=4.828, P=0.015; Region×Fasting: F
2,30=0.348, P=0.709). RMR was significantly influenced by both region and fasting (Region: F
1,30=23.866, P=0.000; Fasting: F
2,30=13.972, P=0.000; Region´Fasting: F
2,30=0.012, P=0.988). RMR in both of the two locations reached the control group’s level after refeeding (Fig. 1a, b). Large intestine wet mass without content: F
2,30=10.078, P=0.000; Large intestine dry mass: F
2,30=10.158, P=0.000; Cecum wet mass without content: F
2,30=5.744, P=0.008; Cecum dry mass: F
2,30=6.834, P=0.004; all of which were significantly impacted by the correlation between region and fasting. Additional data on the digestive system and body composition showed no appreciable alterations (Table 1).
Animals will alter their body composition or employ various coping mechanisms in response to the scarcity of food sources. According to research, hunger will have an impact on an animal’s ability to produce heat and change their body mass
(Ren et al., 2020). The results demonstrated that body mass and RMR in
E. miletus reduced after fasting but restored to the control level after feeding. Internal organs can exhibit phenotypic alterations that may be a result of their functional adaptation
(Wang et al., 2003). Such as AMPK activity in liver is related to energy storage (
Liddle, 2019). Animals’ intestinal and cecum decant masses dramatically decreased after fasting, reflecting adaptive alterations in
E. miletus’s digestive capacity to handle variations in nutrition, energy intake, or other aspect under extreme circumstances
(Bonin et al., 2016). Our findings show that
E. miletus in the DL region lost greater amounts of body mass after fasting than KM, suggesting that the area’s winter food supply was limited and that they were able to adjust their body composition as needed to react to the changes in the food environment.
Changes of serum leptin, serum ghrelin, stomach ghrelin expression and AMPK, malonyl-COA and CPT-1 activities in hypothalamus
Serum leptin, stomach ghrelin and serum ghrelin content varied significantly by region (Leptin:
F1,30=57.696, P=0.000; Stomach ghrelin: F
1,30=104.747, P=0.000; Serum ghrelin: F
1,30=38.022, P=0.000). The effects of fasting on serum leptin, stomach ghrelin and serum ghrelin levels were all profound in
E. miletus (Leptin: F
2,30=23.993, P=0.000; Stomach ghrelin: F
2,30=35.790, P=0.000; Serum ghrelin: F
2,30=25.137, P=0.000). The hypothalamic CPT-1 activity in
E. miletus was only substantially influenced by the region (F
1,30=4.190, P=0.050). Fasting had a significant impact on the hypothalamic activity of AMPK, malonyl-COA and CPT-1 (AMPK: F
2,30=29.936, P=0.000; Malonyl-CoA: F
2,30=14.463, P=0.000; CPT-1: F
2,30=37.872, P=0.000). After the
E. miletus in both locations had been removed on the tenth day, the serum leptin levels and the activities of AMPK, malonyl-COA and CPT-1 reverted to those of the control group (Fig 1 c, d, e, f, g, h).
Dietary intake will limit ghrelin secretion and dietary restriction will boost it
(Bake et al., 2020). In the present investigation, following fasting, serum leptin concentration fell whereas stomach ghrelin and serum ghrelin concentration increased. It is worth noticing that the content of ghrelin in serum of
E. miletus after fasting was higher than that in stomach. Our explanation for this phenomenon is that fasting stimulated
E. miletus greatly and fasting time was short. After ghrelin was produced in stomach fundus, it acted on hypothalamus rapidly through blood circulation. Therefore, a large number of ghrelin could be detected in serum at this time. After refeeding, the feeding center of hypothalamus received the regulation of satiety signal and then reduced ghrelin and increased the secretion of leptin. Leptin and ghrelin levels were also greater in KM
E. miletus than in DL, which can be explained by the superior wintertime feeding conditions in KM. In order to control body mass and waster of energy in the event of a sudden food deficit, KM
E. miletus would release more ghrelin and leptin
(Ren et al., 2020).
AMPK activity increased whereas malonyl-COA and CPT-1 activities decreased in the hypothalamus. This is because in the hypothalamus, the increasing of food intake attribute to the exogenous activation of AMPK, while exogenous inhibition reduces it. In the meantime, AMPK activity increased because of the food restriction in the hypothalamus while refeeding decreases it
(Lopez et al., 2008). Fasting can swiftly boost ghrelin production after activating AMPK, which can subsequently stop ACC from being phosphorylated, lowering the concentration of malonyl-CoA and reducing the release of CPT-1. The secretion concentration of serum leptin is proportional to the level of fat, while leptin suppresses the activity of hypothalamic AMPK, which lowers food intake
(Stark et al., 2013).
Changes of neuropeptide expressions in hypothalamus
Fasting significantly influenced the level of NPY, AgRP, POMC and CART expression in
E. miletus (NPY: F
2,30=37.907, P=0.000; AgRP: F
2,30=82.157, P=0.000; POMC: F
2,30=38.658, P=0.000; CART: F
2,30=27.030, P=0.000); similarly, the influence of region on NPY, AgRP, POMC and CART expression in E. After another 10 days of feeding, the expression of AgRP and POMC in both regions returned to the same state as in the control group (Fig 1 i, j, k, l).
Leptin production is decreased during fasting, allowing ghrelin to trigger the activation of CPT-1a and CPT-1c, which in turn activates NPY/AgRP neurons. This process is made possible by the lowering of malonyl-COA caused by GHS-R1a-AMPK. However, hunger and body mass loss result after gene deletion of AgRP neurons (
Gropp et al., 2005;
Luquet et al., 2005). Neurons that produce AgRP will also be unable to adequately perform this task due to the impairment of AMPK activation
(Claret et al., 2007). While feeding-inhibiting neuropeptide synthesis was higher in KM than in DL, feeding-promoting neuropeptide synthesis was higher in DL. Our argument for this is that DL has poor feeding conditions in the winter due to its high altitude. In order to survive in a generally hostile environment, DL
E. miletus swiftly released hunger signals to boost appetite and began foraging in the midst of food shortages.
Correlation analysis
NPY expression, AgRP expression, serum ghrelin content and AMPK activity were all positively correlated with stomach ghrelin content, while body mass, RMR expression, POMC expression, CART expression, serum leptin content, malonyl-COA activity and CPT-1 activity were all negatively correlated (Fig 2). Malonyl-COA activity, CPT-1 activity, POMC expression, CART expression, serum leptin content and body mass were all positively correlated with serum leptin content, while NPY expression, AgRP expression, serum ghrelin content, AMPK activity and CPT-1 expression were all negatively correlated (Fig 3). NPY expression, AgRP expression and AMPK activity were all positively correlated with serum ghrelin content, while body mass, RMR, POMC expression, CART expression, malonyl-COA activity and CPT-1 activity were all negatively correlated (Fig 4).
It is also important to note that ghrelin and leptin did not function independently throughout the entire experiment. They act as opposing hormones to anorexia on the one hand and anorexia on the other. In order to conserve energy and boost hunger when food is in short supply, leptin concentration decreases and ghrelin levels rise (
Shintani et al., 2001). Even if the ghrelin concentration stays constant, the fall in leptin concentration is sufficient to maintain the increased food intake in winter, leptin is the main blocker of hypothalamic ghrelin activity, according to Kalra’s hypothesis
(Kalra et al., 2003). Contrarily, leptin was also found in stomach
(Bado et al., 1998), despite earlier theories that it originated from fatty tissue
(Zhang et al., 1994). These investigations demonstrate that the AMPK signaling pathway, in which ghrelin plays an important role, is maintained by the combined action of leptin and ghrelin, which is the key to maintaining appetite (
Kohno et al., 2008). We also discovered that ghrelin and leptin may cooperate in the current study to keep AMPK signal active in order to control energy metabolism in
E. miletus.