Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Herbal Mixtures based on Indian Medicinal Plants in Growing Lambs and Ruminal Environments

P.B. Razo-Ortíz1, P.A. Hernández-García2,*, G.D. Mendoza-Martínez3, J.A. Martínez-García3, G. Vázquez-Silva4, C. Díaz-Galván1, J.J. Ojeda-Carrasco2, E. Espinosa-Ayala2
1Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
2Centro Universitario UAEM Amecameca, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Amecameca, Estado de México.
3Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
4Departamento El Hombre y su Ambiente, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México.
Background: The prohibition of the use of antibiotics in lamb feeding requires the search for natural alternatives that can improve productive performance and ruminal fermentation parameters. Herbal mixtures can function as cost-effective substitutes for growth promoters since an extraction or purification process is not required.

Methods: An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of Chebulic myrobalan, Terminalia bellirica and Azadirachta indica on the productive performance of finishing lambs. Thirty-six Hampshire x Suffolk male lambs (initial body weight (BW) 23.52±3.67 kg), in individual crates, were used for 45 days of evaluation after 15 days adaptation and were randomly assigned to treatments which consisted of dietary inclusion of the feed plant additive at 0.000, 0.250, 0.375 and 0.500% of dry matter (DM). Rations were sampled for DM, ash and crude protein (AOAC, 2005), neutral and acid detergent fibre (according to van Soest, 1991) analysis and metabolizable energy was estimated. The animals were weighed on days 1, 15 and 45 before feeding and the average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion rate were calculated by daily recording of the dry matter intake. Contrasts no orthogonal were used to test linear or quadratic effects of the herbal mixture with initial body weight (BW) as a covariate for ADG and final BW.

Result: There was no effect (P>0.05) of herbal mixtures on ADG, final BW, feed efficiency, DM intake and feed conversion by phytobiotic dietary inclusion. Ruminal pH (P=0.07) increased quadratically in response to the herbal mixture dietary concentration. The acetate increased and propionate reduced, both quadratically (P<0.05). The evaluated doses of the polyherbal additive did not influence growth and feed efficiency of lambs. 
In recent years, the use of plant additives rich in secondary metabolites in ruminant nutrition has been considered to improve animal performance (Jouany and Morgavi, 2007). Since the early 1990 s, the mixture of Indian plants Chebulic myrobalan, Terminalia bellirica and Azadirachta indica in the feeding of domestic animals has shown positive effects on intake, digestibility and weight gain in calves (Wheller, 1994).
       
The banning of antibiotics and anabolics as feed strategies (Scarth et al., 2011) has led researchers to search for feed plant additives to replace the synthetic products (Budan et al., 2013). Some herbal mixtures from India have shown positive results in sheep production (Crosby et al., 2017; Martínez-Aispuro et al., 2019) and dairy cattle (Martínez-Aispuro et al., 2019). Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the potential of an herbal mixture in the productive performance and ruminal environment of growing lambs with increasing levels of the feed plant additive.
This experiment was performed according to the recommendations of the International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals (CIOMS, 2012) and was conducted at the experimental facilities of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico in UAEM Amecameca University Centre in January 2019.
Animals and experimental rations
 
Thirty-six male Hampshire × Suffolk lambs (initial body weight of 23.52+3.67 kg) were assigned by a completely randomised design to treatments which consisted of dietary inclusion of the mixture at 0, 0.250, 0.375 and 0.500% of dry matter (DM) of Mebogrow® (Nuproxa México, Querétaro, México) in a basal diet formulated for finishing lambs (Table 1; NRC, 2007). The herbal product was based on Chebulic myrobalan, Terminalia bellirica and Azadirachta indica.
 

Table 1: Experimental diets and chemical composition of the experimental ration.


 
Experimental procedures
 
The lambs were individually housed in individual metabolic crates with a single feeder and nipple drinker. Feed was offered at 08:00 and 15:00 h; water and feed were provided ad libitum. Lambs had a 15 day adaptation period to the experimental diets and the experimental period lasted 45 days. Before starting each experiment, lambs were immunised against Clostridium (Bobact® 8, 2.0 mL lamb-1 intramuscularly) and dewormed (Closantil® 5%, 20 mg kg-1 BW orally). Samples of feed were analysed for ash, DM and crude protein by macro Kjeldahl (AOAC, 2005); neutral and acid detergent fibre using the van Soest et al., (1991) procedures. Lambs were weighed on days 1, 15 and 45 before morning feeding. The response variables were daily feed intake, average daily gain (ADG), feed: gain ratio and final body weight (BW).
       
Rumen fluid samples were collected on day 60 by oesophageal probe before feeding (50 ml) and pH measured immediately and then acidified with metaphosphoric acid and frozen until analysis of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) by gas chromatography (Erwin et al., 1961).
 
Statistical analysis
 
The results are presented as the means and standard error of the means (SEM). The Shapiro-Wilk’s test was used to determine normal distribution and the results were analysed as a completely randomised design. The initial BW was tested as a covariate and the coefficients were estimated by an interactive matrix program to test linear or quadratic effects of herbal mixture concentration with the R Software (Mirman, 2016). Statistical significance was declared at P≤0.05.
Initial BW was not significant as a covariate. Final BW, ADG, daily intake and feed conversion were not affected (P>0.10, Table 2) by dietary inclusion of the herbal mixture. The pH showed a quadratic response (P<0.10), increasing with the intermediate concentrations. However, statistical differences were observed in the ruminal volatile fatty acids (VFA s). The acetate increased (linear and quadratic effect P<0.05) and propionate reduced (quadratic effect; P<0.05). Butyric acid and total VFA s were not affected by the inclusion of the herbal mixture (P>0.05).
 

Table 2: Effect of the concentration of herbal mixture on the productive performance of lambs and ruminal fermentation.


       
The lack of response in this experiment contrasts with previous reports where the animals responded under stress conditions. Misra and Agrawala (2005), who evaluated the same phytobiotic as support for the treatment of metabolic problems in ruminants, found positive responses and found that the variation in feed consumption between days decreased. Polyherbal products, due to the content of their metabolites, are sometimes used for their antibiotics, immunomodulators and immunostimulants, growth promoters, methane reducers and anthelmintic properties (Lillehoj et al., 2018). The terpenes, phenols, polyphenols, carotenoids, oligosaccharides and vitamins from plant species can act as growth promoters (Cardinali et al., 2015; Dalle Zotte et al., 2016) and effects depend on the metabolite and its mechanism of action. Additionally, the addition of herbs, species and bioactive compounds have beneficial effects in feed formulated for ruminants on the antimicrobial and immune properties (Greathead, 2003; Cardozo et al., 2006; Patra et al., 2012; Oh and Hristov, 2016). Research evaluating the dietary inclusion of a polyherbal formula in lambs reported that feed intake, daily weight gain and final weight increased due to secondary plant metabolites (Mejia-Delgadillo et al., 2021). The inclusion of herbs and plants in the rations for lambs can increase the digestibility of DM and the daily gain due to the fermentative changes that their compounds can cause in their ruminal microbiota; thus, improving daily weight gain (Wanapat et al., 2012; Celia et al., 2016).
       
The response in ruminal pH will depend on the type of plant and dose, therefore, results from other herbs can not be compared directly. Rao et al., (2016) found a constant decrease in the pH in the rumen fluid as the inclusion of Azadirachta indica increased, which contrasts with what is observed here. Tannins in plants can affect ruminal biohydrogenation (Khiaosa-Ard et al., 2009) and tannins and phenols can affect the rumen protozoa (Bhatta et al., 2012), which could modify starch digestion and indirectly change rumen pH (Ortega and Mendoza, 2003).
       
Changes in VFA s will depend on the effects of herbs on the populations of bacteria and protozoa. Previous in vitro evaluations of the same polyherbal mixture showed increases in the production of acetic and propionic acids (Sardar et al., 1997); however, this showed increments in acetic and a reduction in the propionic proportion, which is energetically undesirable and explains the lack of response in daily gain. Phytobiotic compounds could improve ruminal microbiota by functioning as antimicrobials and/or growth promoters. Some tannins can alter the bacterial balance by affecting hydrogen cycles through the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation in bacterial mitochondria, altering the hydrogen bonds or chelating mineral ions essential for bacterial metabolism (Scalbert, 1991).
       
Although benefits are expected from herbals, they are not always observed. Wanapat et al., (2008) evaluated the inclusion of Allium sativum in the rations for ruminates, finding increases in propionic acid, decreases in the acetic-propionic ratio and degradation of ruminal nitrogen, associated with reduced rumen protozoa. Changes in rumen protozoa have been related to improvement in ruminal parameters (Wanapat et al., 2012). The changes detected in acetate and propionate do not lead to a possible reduction of methane, although this mixture contains plants that have been evaluated in vitro and have decreased methanogenesis (Gupta et al., 2017) but in vitro protozoa do not survive. Chebulic myrobalan has been evaluated in an in vitro fermentation and has been reported to influence the decrease in methane production (Heidarian-Miri et al., 2013). Terminalia bellirica was controlled in in vitro fermentations to measure its methane inhibitory capacity, discovering that it has a large number of tannins and concluding that these could act directly on the arches without altering the rumen protozoa (Bhatta et al., 2012).
       
One of the main plants of this mixture is Azadirachta indica, which is present in other polyherbals (Martínez-Aispuro et al., 2019; Razo-Ortíz et al., 2020). Azadirachta indica is one of the most studied plants for its metabolites and the major components are terpenes and limonoids with a demonstrated antimicrobial activity and has been used in ethnoveterinary treatments in different species; in ruminants for udder infections and foot root and lice (Ogbuewu et al., 2011). The higher acetate concentration and the higher pH with herbs could be indicators of a higher cellulolytic digestion, but this was not manifested in lambs’ performance as observed in other feed additives which contain Azadirachta indica (Martínez-Aispuro et al., 2019; Razo-Ortíz et al., 2020). This means that the formulas and their proportions can result in combinations that may or may not be successful.
The evaluated doses of the polyherbal additive based on Chebulic myrobalan, Terminalia bellirica and Azadirachta indica did not improve growth and feed efficiency of lambs, even while having some effects on the rumen fermentation pattern.
The authors thank Nuproxa México, Nuproxa Switzerland and the Indian Herbs Co for donating herbal products.
 
Declaration of conflict of interest
 
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript and in the decision to publish the results.
 
Authors’ contributions
 
All authors contributed equally to the conception and writing of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version.
 
Bioethics and biosecurity committee approval
 
Research on animals was approved in accordance with the rules of the institutional committee on animal use of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico campus UAEM Amecameca University Centre and in accordance with the regulations of the Law of Animal Protection of the State of México.

  1. Association of Analytical Chemists (AOAC). (2005). Official Methods of Analysis (18th Edn.). Washington DC, USA. pp. 128.

  2. Bhatta, R., Baruah, L., Saravanan, M., Suresh, K.P. and Sampath, K.T. (2012). Effect of medicinal and aromatic plants on rumen fermentation, protozoa population and methanogenesis in vitro. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 97(3): 446-56.

  3. Budan, A., Tessier, N., Saunier, M., Gillmann, L., Hamelin, J., Chicoteau, P., Richomme, P. and Guilet, D. (2013). Effect of several saponin containing plant extracts on rumen fermentation in vitro, Tetrahymena pyriformis and sheep erythrocytes. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 11(2): 576-582.

  4. Cardinali, R., Cullere, M., Dal Bosco, A., Mugnai, C., Ruggeri, S., Mattioli, S., Castellini, C., Trabalza-Marinucci and DalleZotte, A. (2015). Oregano, rosemary and vitamin E dietary supplementation in growing rabbits: Effect on growth performance, carcass traits, bone development and meat chemical composition. Livestock Science. 175: 83-89.

  5. Cardozo, P.W., Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A. and Kamel, C. (2006). Effects of alfalfa extract, anise, capsicum and a mixture of cinnamaldehyde and eugenol on ruminal fermentation and protein degradation in beef heifers fed a high concentrate diet. Journal of Animal Science. 84: 2801-2808.

  6. Celia, C., Cullere, M., Gerencsér, Z., Matics, Z., Tasoniero, G., Dal Bosco, A., Giaccone, V., Szendrõ, Z. and DalleZotte, A. (2016). Effect of pre-and post-weaning dietary supplementation with Digestarom® herbal formulation on rabbit carcass traits and meat quality. Meat Science. 118: 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.022.

  7. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (2012). International Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. Available from: http://www.cioms.  Accessed: Sep, 11, 2018. 

  8. Crosby, M., Mendoza-Martínez, G.D., Relling, A., Vázquez, V.A., Lee-Rangel, H.A., Martínez-García, J.A. and Oviedo, M. (2017). Influence of supplemental choline on milk yield, fatty acid profile and postpartum weight changes in suckling ewes. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(Suppl 2): 125.

  9. DalleZotte, A., Celia, C. and Szendrõ, Z. (2016). Herbs and spices inclusion as feedstuff or additive in growing rabbit diets and as additive in rabbit meat: A review. Livestock Science. 189: 82-90. 

  10. Erwin, E.S., Marco, G.J. and Emery, E.M. (1961). Volatile fatty acid analysis of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. Journal of Dairy Science. 44: 1768-1771.

  11. Greathead, H. (2003). Plants and plant extracts for improving animal productivity. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. 62: 279-290. 

  12. Gupta, V.P., Kamra, D.N., Agarwal, N. and Chaudhary, L.C. (2017). In vitro evaluation of calcium nitrate and a blend of plants containing secondary metabolites for their impact on methanogenesis and feed fermentation. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology. 17(3): 399-408.

  13. Heidarian-Miri, V., Tyagi, A.K., Ebrahimi, S.H. and Mohini, M. (2013). Plant extract enhanced ruminal CLA concentration, in vitro. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. 22(3): 219-228.

  14. Jouany, J.P. and Morgavi, D.P. (2007). Use of ‘natural’ products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production. Animal. 1(10): 1443-1466. 

  15. Khiaosa-Ard, R., Bryner, S.F., Scheeder, M.R.L., Wettstein, H.R., Leiber, F., Kreuzer, M. and Soliva, C.R. (2009). Evidence for the inhibition of the terminal step of ruminal á-linolenic acid biohydrogenation by condensed tannins. Journal of Dairy Science. 92(1): 177-188. 

  16. Lillehoj, H., Liu, Y., Calsamiglia S., Fernandez-Miyakawa, M.E., Chi, F., Cravens, R.L., Oh, S. and Gay, C.G. (2018). Phytochemicals as antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health. Veterinary Research. 49(1): 1-18. 

  17. Martínez-Aispuro, J.A., Mendoza-Martinez, G.D., Cordero-Mora, J.L., Ayala-Monter, M.A., Sánchez-Torres, M.T., Figueroa- Velasco, J.L., Vázquez-Silva, G. and Gloria-Trujillo, A. (2019). Evaluation of an herbal choline feed plant additive in lamb feedlot rations. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 48: 11.  https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820190020.

  18. Mejia-Delgadillo, M.A., Lee-Rangel, H.A., Hernandez-Garcia, P.A., Vazquez-Valladolid, A., Mendez-Cortes, H., Guerra-Liera, J.E. and Lopez-Inzunza, H.J. (2021). Effect of a polyherbal additive on performance and parasite infection of Hair Creole Ewes. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1: 5. https://doi.org/10.18805/IJAR.B-1370.

  19. Mendoza-Martínez, G.D., Oviedo, M.F., Pinos, J.M., Lee-Rangel, H.A., Vázquez, A., Flores, R. and Pérez, F. (2019). Milk production in dairy cows supplemented with herbal choline and methionine. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. 52(1): 332-343.

  20. Mirman, D. (2016). Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization using R. Chapman and Hall/CRC The R Series. CRC Press. Taylor and Francis Group.

  21. Misra, S.K. and Agrawala, S.K. (2005). Clinical evaluation of HerbMix in liver disorders, ketosis and other conditions. Livestock International. 11-15.

  22. National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants. Sheep, Goats, Cervids and New World Camelids. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

  23. Ogbuewu, I.P., Odoemenam, Y.U., Obikaonu, H.O., Opara, M.N., Emenalom, O.O., Uchegbu, M.C., Esonu, B.O. and Iloeje, M.U. (2011). The growing importance of Neem (Azadirachta  indica A. Juss) in agriculture, industry, medicine and environment: A review. Research Journal of Medicinal Plant. 5: 230-245.

  24. Oh, A.N. and Hristov, J. (2016). Effects of Plant-derived Bio-active Compounds on Rumen Fermentation, Nutrient Utilization, Immune Response and Productivity of Ruminant Animals. In: Medicinal and Aromatic Crops: Production, Phytochemistry and Utilization. [Jeliazkov, V.D., Zheljazkov, C.L. (eds)]. American Chemical Society Publications, Washington DC, USA. pp. 167-186. 

  25. Ortega, C.M. and Mendoza, M.G. (2003). Starch digestion and glucose metabolism in the ruminant: A review. Interciencia.  28(7): 380-386. 

  26. Patra, A.K., Min, B.R. and Saxena, J. (2012). Dietary tannins on microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract in ruminants. Biotechnology Reports. 17: 126-136. 

  27. Rao, S.B., Jash, S., Dineshkumar, D., Krishnamoorthy, P., Elangovan, A.V., Sivaram, M., Parthipa, S. and Selvaraju, S. (2016). Influence of detoxified neem seed cake on diet digestibility, body weight change, hormonal profiles, immune response and testicular gene expression in male sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 211: 41-49.

  28. Razo-Ortíz, P.B., Mendoza-Martínez, G.D., Silva, G.V., Osorio-Teran, A.I., González-Sánchez, J.F., Hernández-García, P.A., de la Torre-Hérnandez, M.E. and Espinosa-Ayala, E. (2020). Polyherbal feed additive for lambs: Effects on performance, blood biochemistry and biometry. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 48(1): 419-424.

  29. Sardar, P., Neelam, K. and Kaur, H. (1997). Influence of Livol supplementation on rumen fermentation in cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 13(3): 189-192.

  30. Scalbert, A. (1991). Antimicrobial properties of tannins. Phytochemistry. 30(12): 3875-3883. 

  31. Scarth, J.P., Clarke, A., Teale, P., Mill, A., Macarthur, R. and Kay, J. (2011). Detection of endogenous steroid abuse in cattle: Results from population studies in the UK. Food Additives and Contaminants: Part A. 28(1): 44-61. 

  32. van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(10): 3583-3597.

  33. Wanapat, M., Khejornsart, P., Pakdee, P. and Wanapat, S. (2008). Effect of supplementation of garlic powder on rumen ecology and digestibility of nutrients in ruminants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 88(13): 2231-2237. 

  34. Wanapat, M., Kongmun, P., Poungchompu, O., Cherdthong, A., Khejornsart, P., Pilajun, R. and Kaenpakdee, S. (2012). Effects of plants containing secondary compounds and plant oils on rumen fermentation and ecology. Tropical Animal Health and Production. 44(3): 399-405.

  35. Wheller, G.E. (1994). Evaluation of a HerbMix as a feed ingredient for optimizing liver function and growth in veal calves. Indian Journal of Indigenous Medicines. 10(2): 27-30.

Editorial Board

View all (0)