Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.5 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 53 issue 11 (november 2019) : 1485-1488

Growth, lipid profile and methane production by sheep fed diets containing yeast (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae)

C.O. Osita, A.O. Ani, C. Ezema, C.E. Oyeagu, I.E. Uzochukwu, I.E. Ezemagu
1Department of Animal Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Cite article:- Osita C.O., Ani A.O., Ezema C., Oyeagu C.E., Uzochukwu I.E., Ezemagu I.E. (2019). Growth, lipid profile and methane production by sheep fed diets containing yeast (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(11): 1485-1488. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-969.
A twelve-week study was conducted to determine the effects of dietary inclusion of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on growth performance, lipid profile and methane production by West African dwarf sheep. Twenty four (24) lambs(12 males and 12 females) were randomly allotted to six treatment diets in a 3x2 factorial arrangement involving grass (Panicum maximum) hay, grass/ legume mixture (50:50) hay and legume (Centrosema pubescens) hay  either without or with S. cerevisiae supplementation (1.5g/ kg diet). Result showed that the average daily feed intake, average daily weight gain and final body weight were significantly higher for sheep fed legume diet with S. cerevisieae supplementation than those fed other diets. Sheep fed grass diet without supplementary yeast had significantly higher methane emission than those fed other diets. Based on the results, the addition of S. cerevisiae to legume diet was recommended to improve feed intake, daily weight gain, feed efficiency and methane emission.
  1. Abu El-Ella, A. and Kommonna, O.F. (2013). Reproductive performance and blood constituents of Damascus goats as affected by yeast culture supplementation. Egyptian Journal of Sheep and Goat Sciences. 8: 171-187.
  2. Ahmed, B.M. and Salah, M.S. (2002). Effect of yeast culture as an additive to sheep feed on performance, digestibility, nitrogen balance and rumen fermentation. J King Saud Univ Agric Sci.,14:1-3.
  3. AOAC, (1995). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis (14th Edn.). Washington, DC, 1018.
  4. Ayad, M. A., Benallou, B., Saim, M. S., Smadi,M. A., Meziane, T. (2013). Impact of feeding yeast culture on milk yield, milk components and blood components in Algerian dairy herds. J.Veterinar. Sci. Technol., 4: 135
  5. Beauchemin, K.A., Kreuzer, M., O’Mara, F., McAllister, T.A. (2008). Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 48: 21-27.
  6. Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Walker, N.D., Bach, A. (2008). Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 145:5-26.
  7. Chiofalo, V., Liotta, L., Chiofalo, B. (2004). Effects of the administration of Lactobacilli on body growth and on the metabolic profile in growing maltese goat kids. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 44:449-457.
  8. Dewhurst, R.J., Delaby, L., Moloney, A., Boland, T., Lewis, E. (2009). Nutritive value of forage legumes used for grazing and silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research. 48: 167–187.
  9. Duncan, D.B. (1955). Duncan New Multiple Range Test. Biometrics. 11: 1-42.
  10. Fraser, T. and Rowarth, J. (1996). Legumes, herbs or grass for lamb performance? Proc New Zeal Grassl Assoc., 58:49–52.
  11. Friedewald, W.T., Levy, R.I., Fredrickson, D.S. (1972). Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem., 18:499-502.
  12. Goering, H.K., Van Soest, P.J. (1970). Forage Analysis. Agriculture Handbook, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 156- 194.
  13. Jouany, J.P. and Morgavi, D.P. (2007). Use of “natural” products as alternatives to antibiotic feed additives in ruminant production. Animal. 1:1443-1466.
  14. Lascano G. J., Zanton, G. I., Suarez-Mena, M. F., Heinrichs, A. J. (2009). Effect of limit feeding highand low-concentrate diets with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on digestibility and on dairy heifer growth and first-lactation performance. J. Dairy Sci.,92: 5100-5110.
  15. McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Morgan, C. A. (2002). Animal Nutrition (6th Edn.). Pearson Education (Singapore) Press Ltd New Delhi, India, pp. 693.
  16. Moe, P. W. and Tyrrell, H. F. (1979). Methane production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 62: 1583-1586.
  17. Moss, A.R., Jouany, J.P., Newbold, J. (2000).Methane production by ruminants: Its contribution to global warming. Annales Zootechnie. 49: 231-253.
  18. Tripathi, M. K. and Karim, S. A. (2010).Effect of individual and mixed live yeast culture feeding on growth performance, nutrient utilization and microbial crude protein synthesis in lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 155: 163- 171.
  19. Wallace, R.J. (1994). Ruminal microbiology, biotechnology and ruminant nutrition: Progress and problems. J. Anim. Sci., 72: 2992-    3003.

Editorial Board

View all (0)