Clinical parameters
Onset of sedation
Comparison between groups revealed rapid onset of sedation in animals of Group A than Group C and B. Onset of sedation was significantly (P<0.05) shorter in Group A as compared to Group C and B as shown in Table 1. The shorter period of sedation onset was achieved by administration of diazepam which collaborates with the findings of
Kumar et al., (2006) and
Nain et al., (2010) in buffalo calves and might be due to depression of CNS that is mediated through depression of limbic system and due to enhancement of gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) by binding of diazepam to GABAA receptor, an inhibitory channel which when activated, decreases neuronal activity
(Hall et al., 2001). In Group C, there was decrease in the behavioural activity of animals after administration of xylazine and thereafter animals went to lateral recumbency within 4.11±1.06 min. Similarly,
Nirmale et al., (2024) documented average sedation time 3.75±0.25 min.after administration of xylazine intravenously. Onset of sedation was quicker in this group which could be due to sedative activity of α 2 - adrenoceptor agonists in the locus coeruleus, where noradrenergic neurons are found in high concentration
(Singh et al., 2006). These findings are concurrent to
Habib et al., (2002) in sheep after intramuscular administration of xylazine and
Tunio et al., (2003) in goats after intravenous administration of detomidine. Similarly,
Kumar et al., (2006) also reported decrease in spontaneous activity where animals went into sternal recumbency by 8.00±1.00 min following administration of detomidine in buffalo calves. Sedative effects of α-2 agonists are associated with the activation of alpha-2 adrenoceptors, which cause decrease in the release and turnover of norepinephrine in the CNS
(Shah et al., 2025). In present study, the administration of butorphanol did not affect degree of sedation and temperament of the animal, as a result longer onset of sedation was noticed in animals of group B. Similar finding was also reported by
Almubarak (2013) in camels after administration of butorphanol.
Induction of anaesthesia
Onset of induction was rapid in animals premedicated with diazepam and xylazine as compared to group B (Table 1), which might be due to synergistic effect of diazepam and xylazine which produced sufficient degree of sedation prior to induction with ketamine. Similarly,
Mool (2012) noted induction time of 46.25±1.83 and 30.00±3.27 seconds after diazepam-ketamine and xylazine-ketamine anaesthesia respectively in buffalo calves. Combination of midazolam with ketamine resulted in rapid induction of general anaesthesia characterized by muscle relaxation, analgesia and smooth recovery (
Howaida, 2013) as midazolam binds to GABA receptors and decreases the nerve activity. Similar findings were supported by
Kumar et al., (2014b) in buffalo calves.
Suyawanshi et al., (2023) also reported that diazepam and ketamine facilitate the smooth induction of general anaesthesia in buffalo underwent for diaphragmatic hernia. In the present study, animals of group C showed quicker onset of induction of anaesthesia following ketamine administration which might be due to the synergistic effect of xylazine as it produces sufficient degree of sedation prior to induction with ketamine anaesthesia. These findings are in agreement with
Pathak et al., (1982) who reported onset of anaesthesia within 1.75 min after intravenous administration of ketamine anaesthesia only in buffalo calves, probably due to rapid redistribution of ketamine to other body parts.
Duration of anaesthesia
There was significant (P<0.05) longer duration of anaesthesia in animals of group C as compared to group A and B (Table 1) which might be due to additive effect of xylazine with ketamine completely after induction of anaesthesia with ketamine which signify that surgical stage of anaesthesia has reached in terms of sedation, analgesia and muscle relaxation. All the reflexes abolished. Similarly,
Mool (2012) reported longer duration of anaesthesia after xylazine-ketamine (30-34 min) than diazepam-ketamine (20-24 min) in buffalo calves.
Avinash et al., (2023) also noted duration of anaesthesia to be 36.00±1.13 after dexmedetomidine-ketamine anaesthesia in bovines.
Kumar et al., (2014a) reported duration of anaesthesia in buffalo calves as 37.12 min after diazepam-ketamine anaesthesia respectively. In the present study, diazepam, butorphanol or xylazine was combined with ketamine to prolong the duration of analgesia with good muscle relaxation. Hence, a longer duration of anaesthesia was observed in buffalo calves premedicated with xylazine as compared to butorphanol or diazepam as
Pathak et al., (1982) documented that ketamine alone in buffalo calves produced analgesia for 3.0 to 5.50 min (4.45±0.34) with muscular rigidity, thus rendering it practically useless for most surgical procedures.
Complete recovery time
Complete recovery time was significantly (P<0.05) longer in animals of group C followed by group A and group B. Longer complete recovery time in animals of group C and A might be due to synergistic action of xylazine or diazepam with ketamine whereas shorter recovery in animals of group B revealed faster rate of metabolic clearance of butorphanol-ketamine from the body. Recovery from ketamine anaesthesia occurs through tissue redistribution and hepatic metabolism of the drug making it a short acting anaesthetic drug
(Santosh et al., 2013). The present findings corroborates with the findings of
Canpolat et al., (2016) and
Sengar et al., (2020) who noted recovery time of 108±12.4 min after medetomidine-ketamine anaesthesia and 132.85±3.24 min following medetomidine-ketofol anaesthesia in goats respectively. Similar observations have also been reported by
Pawde et al., (2000) and
Kumar et al., (2014a) in buffalo calves following detomidine-diazepam-ketamine and diazepam-ketamine anaesthesia respectively. Correspondingly,
Kaur and Singh (2004) also noticed early restoration of vital reflexes and quick recovery after midazolam followed by ketamine in bovines.
Physiological parameters
Rectal temperature (°F)
Animals of group A, B and C exhibited non-significant decrease in rectal temperature after administration of diazepam, butorphanol and xylazine which further tend to decrease significantly (P<0.05) up to 10, 20 and 40 min respectively following ketamine anaesthesia (Fig 1). Later on, these values increased gradually and returned to base value by 120 min of observation. Non significant change in rectal temperature after diazepam or midazolam administration in buffalo calves was reported by Nain
et al (2010) which might be attributed to action of benzodiazepine CNS depression and decreased muscular activity alongwith blocking of the hypothalamic thermoregulatory center by the anaesthetics, whereas
Almubarak (2013) observed a non significant decrease in rectal temperature after butorphanol administration in camels. The decrease in rectal temperature in group C was also due to activation of α-
2 receptor by xylazine and due to depression of thermoregulatory centre in the brain which mediate hypothermia (
Lemke, 2004). This might also be resulted due to generalized sedation, reduced metabolic rate, muscle relaxation and CNS depression. Similar findings have also been reported by
Yadav et al., (2008) in cattle and
Shah et al., (2025) in Barbari goats following xylazine administration. In the present study, decrease in rectal temperature following ketamine anaesthesia could be due to reduced basal metabolic rate, decreased muscle activities leading to production of less heat in the body and depression of hypothalamic thermoregulatory centre of brain
(Avinash et al., 2023) and increased in rectal temperature after recovery from ketamine anaesthesia could be attributed to increased tonocity of the muscles. Similar finding were also reported by
Canploat et al., (2016) and
Rahman et al., (2021) after ketamine anaesthesia in goats and sheep respectively.
Respiratory rate (Breaths/min)
There was a non-significant increase in respiratory rate in animals of group A, after diazepam administration (Fig 2). However, respiratory rate decreased non significantly by 10 min after induction of ketamine anaesthesia. The present findings support the results reported by
Kumar et al., (2014a) after diazepam administration which trend to decrease after induction of ketamine anaesthesia in buffalo calves. Animals of Group B also showed non significant increase in respiratory rate after administration of butorphanol which was further trend to increase non significantly by 10 min after induction with ketamine anaesthesia. Later on the respiratory rate decreased gradually and returned to base value by 120 min of the anaesthetic period. These results concurred with
Almubarak (2013) in camels after butorphanol administration. Contrary to this group,
Singh et al., (2023) reported a significant (P<0.05) decrease in respiratory rate at 5 min after administration of fentanyl in buffaloes. The respiratory rate was significantly (P<0.05) decreased up to 60 min following xylazine-ketamine administration in group C with maximum reduction at 40 min interval. Later on, the respiratory rate returned to base value by 120 min of the anaesthetic period. The bradypnoea after xylazine-ketamine might be due to depression of CNS by xylazine and due to activation of α2-adrenergic pathway, leading to induction of local coeruleus neurons. Similar findings were recorded by
Venkatgiri et al., (2017) in cattle,
Rahman et al., (2021) in sheep and
Shah et al., (2025) in Barbari goats. The depression of respiratory rate following administration of xylazine-ketamine might have resulted due to depression of thermoregulatory centre of the brain. Almost all alpha2- agonists were reported to cause some degree of respiration disturbance due to their secondary depression of the CNS
(Shah et al., 2014). In the present study, reduced respiration rate might be due to depression of respiratory centers either by xylazine alone or by both xylazine-ketamine.
Heart rate (Beats/min)
There was a non significant decrease in heart rate after administration of diazepam in group A, which tend to increase non-significantly upto 20 min after induction of ketamine anaesthesia (Fig 3). This occurred as a result of diazepam’s parasympatomimetic action and partial baroreceptor reflex desensitization. Similar findings were also pen down by
Nain et al., (2010) in buffalo calves. The present findings collaborated with
Pawde et al., (2000) and
Kumar et al., (2014a) who documented only limited cardiorespiratory effect with no significant changes in heart rate following diazepam-ketamine anaesthesia in buffalo calves. While, animals of group B showed a significant (P<0.05) increase in heart rate after administration of butorphanol which further increased non significantly at 10 min after induction with ketamine and thereafter values gradually returned to base value by 120 min interval. Similar observations were also reported by
Almubarak (2013), in camels after butorphanol administration which could be as a result of CNS stimulation. After ketamine induction, increased heart rate might be due to cardiovascular stimulant property of ketamine, which is due to action on sympathetic trunk and inhibition of neuronal uptake of catecholamine by sympathetic nerve endings
(Kumar et al., 2014 b) or may be due to increase in central release of catecholamine resulting in tachycardia. There was significant (P<0.05) decrease in heart rate leading to bradycardia after administration of α
2-agonist xylazine in group C. The present findings are in concurrent with
Pawde et al., (2000) in buffalo calves,
Singh et al., (2013) in water buffaloes,
Avinash et al., (2023) in bovines and
Shah et al., (2025) in Barbari goats. After induction with ketamine anaesthesia heart rate also decreased and then gradually increased and returned to near normal physiological range up to observation period. This might be due to synergistic effect with α
2-adrenergic agonist which suppress the cardiovascular stimulating effects of ketamine (
Lin and Walz, 2014). The combination of α
2- agonists with ketamine has proven suitable for surgical anaesthesia and analgesia. The coadministration of α
2-agonist counteracts the muscle rigidity and CNS excitation associated with ketamine while sympathomimetic effects of ketamine can to some extent offset cardiovascular depressant effects of α
2 agonist (
Fazili and Bhattacharyya, 2008). Although ketamine may increase the heart rate due to increased sympathetic activity and decreased vagal tone and xylazine overrides these effects by excitatory carotid baroreceptor reflex induced by hypotension and decreased sympathetic and increased vagal activity
(Afshar et al., 2005). On the contrary,
Rahman et al., (2021) documented significant (P<0.05) increase in heart rate after atropine-xylazine-ketamine and atropine-ketamine anaesthesia in sheep.