Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Proximate and Amino Acid Composition of Freshwater Fish of Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

S.S. Relekar1, J.M. Koli2, S.B. Gore1,*, A.S. Mohite2, A.S. Desai2, S.M. Wasave2, P.A. Telvekar1, A.U. Pagarkar2
1College of Fishery Science, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur-440 006, Maharashtra, India.
2College of Fisheries, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Ratnagiri-415 629, Maharashtra, India.

Background: The study aimed to evaluate proximate and amino acids profile of selected freshwater species from Nagpur, India. Nutritional composition of calbasu (Labeo calbasu), silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and pangasius (Pangasianodon pangasius) was investigated to make aware the consumer about the present nutrient composition of these fish.

Methods: Iced Calbasu, Silver carp, Tilapia and Pangasius fish were procured from Mayo fish market, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India and brought to the laboratory of Fish Processing Technology, College of Fishery Science, Nagpur. The marketable sized (average weight of 0.5-1.3 kg) fish were used for evaluation of proximate composition the methods of AOAC (2005). The amino acids profiling of fish samples were assessed by using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu LC-6A).

Result: The variation (p<0.05) in nutrient composition viz. proximate and amino acids of these fish mainly due the effect of feed composition, feeding habits, geographical condition and availability of feed etc. The major components of proximate composition, moisture (75.75-77.53%), protein (14.52-18.01%), lipids (2.45-6.71%) and ash (1.10-2.09%) were recorded. The protein content was relatively stable in all species. The carbohydrate was found to be lower than 1.5%. The energy value of the fish species was between 94.81-123.51 Kcal. The pangasius had higher energy value due to high amount of fat content.  During the study, the concentrations of essential amino acids (EAA) in all fish species ranged from 25.48 g/100 g to 29.41 g/100 g, while amounts of non-essential amino acids (NEAA) ranged between 27.94 g/100 g and 31.27 g/100 g. Lysine (5.14-6.31 g/100 g) and glutamic acid (6.26-8.72 g/100 g) were the most predominant amino acids found in EAA and NEAA respectively in all species. The higher level of essential amino acids was found in tilapia fish followed by silver carp, calbasu and pangasius. The results of the present study revealed that, all species have high nutritional value in terms of proximate and amino acids to offer positive health benefits upon consumption.

Freshwater fish is recognized as a valuable source of nutrients for diversified and healthy diets (Fawole et al., 2007). Fish has been characterized by vital animal protein source accounting for 16% of the whole animal protein consumed by the world’s population and it is a noteworthy source of vital nutrients for sustaining a healthy body (Ondo-Azi et al., 2013). 
       
Fish are excellent sources of essential nutrients like protein, amino acids and fatty acids (Zula and Desta, 2021).  Fish proteins have great biological significance due to the presence of enough amount of indispensable amino acids mostly methionine, lysine, histidine, threonine and valine (Tilami and Samples, 2018). Its major roles are in the creation of growth hormones, energy development, muscle development, absorption of calcium, immune function, good digestion, better sleep and sexual function of the body (Holecek, 2020). The dispensable amino acids such as glycine, glutamine, glutamate, proline and arginine show vital roles in maintaining gene expression (Kim et al., 2011). Apart from these, non-essential amino acids have biological functions, cell signaling, blood flow, nutrient transport and metabolism in animal cells (Wang et al., 2013). Works related to the chemical composition of fish are reported in the literature (Yalcin and Demet, 2014; Sarma et al., 2015).
       
Out of the total inland fish production (121.21 Lakh tonnes) of India in 2021-22, Maharashtra has contributed about 1.57 lakh tonnes, of which nearly 49.6% comes from Vidarbha region of Maharashtra, India (DoF, Maharashtra, 2022). Nagpur in the Vidarbha, is an important hub for varieties of freshwater fishes such as Indian major carps, tilapia, pangasius, murrel and minor carps, which are abundantly available in the fish market. Though fish are well known recognized to support the health of human beings, there is little known about the changes in the centennial composition of these fish before consumption. Also, the quality of freshwater fish is essential to maintain during post-harvest processing and storage. Moreover, the previous work related to the present study is reported to a limited extent on proximate composition only.
       
Keeping in the above view, freshwater fishes such as calbasu, silver carp, tilapia and pangasius were selected to assess their nutritional quality for consumption. The nutritional information such as proximate composition and amino acids profile will reveal information to food scientists, nutritionists, dieticians, researchers, consumers and would be useful to small entrepreneurs for the preparation of health beneficial fortified or value-added fish products from freshwater fish.
Materials
 
Calbasu (Labeo calbasu), Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix), Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and Pangasius (Pangasianodon pangassius) fish with an average weight of 0.8-1 kg, 0.9-1.2 kg, 0.5-0.6 kg and 1.1-1.3 kg respectively were procured from Mayo fish market, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India and brought to the laboratory of Fish Processing Technology, College of Fishery Science, Nagpur in iced condition (1:1 ratio of fish:ice). After arrival, fish were processed for dressing (de-headed, descaled, gutted) and washed with potable water. Fresh fish muscles were used for the estimation of proximate composition. Whilst, other fillets were minced, dried and converted into fine powder. The prepared fish powder was kept in appropriately labeled sterilized plastic bags and stored at -4°C for amino acid profiling. The study was carried out during the period from October 2023 to March, 2024 in the College of Fishery Science, Nagpur, India.
 
Proximate analysis
 
The proximate composition such as moisture, lipids,  protein and ash content of fish samples was analyzed per the methods of AOAC (2005). The carbohydrate value was calculated as [100 - (sum of moisture, protein, lipids and ash %)]. While, Energy values were calculated as protein × 4 + lipids × 9 + carbohydrate × 4 (Jabeen and Chaudhry, 2011).
 
Amino acids profiling
 
The amino acid profiling of fish samples was assessed using HPLC (Shimadzu LC-6A). The fish samples were digested in 6 N HCL for 20 h, incubated in an oven (110°C) and neutralized with 4.8 mL of 10 M NaOH. The retention time and peak area of standards were used for quantifying and identifying individual amino acids (Herawati et al., 2018). The result was expressed in g per 100 g of dried fish powder.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The data obtained in triplicate were expressed as mean ± S.D. (Standard Deviation). All data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The means were compared using Tukey’s multiple-range test. The statistical analysis of the data was performed by using Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS 8.0 for Windows developed by SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The P value ≤0.05 was measured as a significant difference.
Proximate composition
 
The proximate composition of selected freshwater fish species analyzed in the present study is given in Table 1. The marketable-sized fish species were procured directly from the local fish market and therefore the origin of the species is unknown (wild or cultured). The nutrient composition of fish species varies with the growth rate and various factors such as available natural food, feed composition in cultured fish, trophic state of the water body, temperature as well as a lightening conditions influence the growth of fish species (Tilami et al., 2018). However, the present investigation aims to provide information on the nutrient composition of meat of fish for a better understanding of the health benefits they would offer to consumers.
 

Table 1: Proximate composition (%) of four freshwater fish species from Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.


       
From the Table 1, it can be seen that moisture, protein, lipid and ash content among the fish species studied varied significantly (p<0.05). All the fish species under study showed moisture content from 75.75% to 77.53%. Silver carp had a high amount of moisture and the lowest was found in pangasius. The moisture percentage usually ranges between 60-80% (Aberounmand, 2014). The protein content of these fish species ranged from 14.52% to 18.01%. Lipid content varied from 2.45% in calbasu to 6.71% in pangasius. The values of moisture content recorded for tilapia in the present study was found lower than those reported for wild, pond, gher and cage cultured tilapia. Nevertheless, higher values of proteins and fat reported in the current study than those reported by Islam et al., (2021) for wild, pond, gher and cage cultured tilapia. The highest lipid content in pangasius reflected the muscle characteristics of fish. The reverse relationship was observed between moisture and lipids and was species-specific (Cardinal et al., 2011). The same was conspicuous in the case of pangasius. The result of the lipid content of pangasius is generally similar to those reported by Begum et al., (2019) for pangasius (6.99±0.36%) collected from the market of Bangladesh. Generally, pangasius in Nagpur fish market are sourced from aquaculture and their feed normally contains rice bran and cotton seed, which are rich in fat. On the contrary, Chakma et al., (2022) observed that farmed pangas contains higher protein and lower fat content than wild pangas.  The usual range of ash content (1.10%-2.09%) was recorded in all species. The highest ash content was confirmed in Labeo Calbasu, may be due to the small intracellular bone in carp muscle. The carbohydrate content was found to be lower than 1.5%. The nearly similar result was observed by Kocatepe and Tarun (2012). The nutritional composition of muscle of fish species depends on the food and feeding habits of individual fish and varies from species to species (Islam and Joadder, 2005; Monalisa et al., 2013). To support the results of the present study, several authors globally reported slightly variable proximate composition of freshwater fish species of the world (Memon et al., 2010; Paul et al., 2018).
       
The energy value of the meat of fish under study varied between 94.81 Kcal to 123.51 Kcal. The highest energy value in pangasius (123.51 Kcal) was obviously due to the high lipid content of the muscle. The results similar to the current study were also reported for calorie content (89.3-90.2 Kcal) in freshwater carp species (Mukundan et al., 1986).
       
The analysis of the proximate composition of the present study revealed that the freshwater fish from Nagpur could be a good source of animal protein and would provide several health benefits such as helping in reducing oxidative stress of adipose tissue, reducing obesity, controlling type 2 diabetes and reducing inflammation (Tilami et al., 2018) through fish consumption.
 
Amino acid (AA) composition
 
In the present study, the concentrations of essential and non-essential amino acids were analyzed and listed in Table 2. Total 17 amino acids were recorded in the present study, which were higher than as reported by Begum et al., (2019) for cultured pangas and lower than those reported by Rieuwpassa et al., (2022) for farmed tilapia. Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins. Thus, proteins help in muscular body building, etc. The present study demonstrated that all species are good sources of essential and non-essential amino acids. The higher concentrations of all amino acids were analyzed in tilapia followed by silver carp, calbasu and pangasius. The total essential amino acids (EAA) content ranged from 25.50 g/100 g to 30.06 g/100 g, while non-essential amino acids (NEAA) were in the range of 31.26 g/100 g-32.25 g/100 g. Tryptophane was not detected in the study due to acid hydrolysis of the sample. The highest concentration of EAA was found in tilapia, whereas higher NEAA was observed in calbasu. The level of abundance of each amino acid varies with the species in the present study. This may be attributed particularly to variation in feed composition, nutrients availability, habitat, etc
 

Table 2: Amino acid (AA) composition (g/100 g) of four freshwater fish species in relation to the essential and non-essential amino acids along with reference value of FAO (2013).


       
Lysine was the major essential amino acid found in tilapia followed by silver carp, pangasius and calbasu, which play major role in the creation of growth hormones and energy (Meybodi, 2019). Similar to the results of the present study, highest content of lysine was also observed in farmed pangas (Begum et al., 2019). However, lower content of lysine was noticed in the current study than reported by Rieuwpassa et al., (2022) for farmed tilapia. Other important EAAs in the present study were leucine, methionine, histidine, threonine, etc. also found in appreciable quantities. Leucine has healing and rejuvenation properties for skin, muscle and bone, whereas histidine assists in the formation of brain chemicals and is instrumental in the functioning of the immune system, digestion, sleep and sexual function of the body (Holecek, 2020). The lower content of histidine was observed during the study than those reported by Paul et al., (2018) for L. calbasu species collected from farm as well as market. In the present study, the phenylalanine and valine content ranged from 2.85 to 2.51 g/100 g and 3.67 to 3.14 g/100 g respectively. The species under study have shown a good source of EAA as values reported in the present study were found above the levels recommended by FAO (2013) for EAA except for valine and phenylalanine.
       
Among NEAA, glutamate was the primary NEAA found in large quantity in all the species under study and was followed by amino acid, glycine. The highest level of NEAA was found in calbasu (55.55%) and the lowest was observed in tilapia (51.26%). Total amino acids (TAA) observed for tilapia (95. 60 g/100 g) were found higher than the present study (61.61 g/100 g) (Abdulkarim et al., 2017) and out of TAA, EAA contained 41 g/100 g, which was also higher than observed for tilapia in the current study. The values of cysteine and tyrosine found in the present study were well below the level recommended by FAO (2013), which were 2.20 g/100 g and 3.80 g/100 g respectively.
       
Several researchers observed results similar to the current study for amino acid composition of fish. Lysine, leucine and glutamic acids were the most prominent amino acids found in tilapia fish procured from different culture systems (Islam et al., 2021), which are in line with the present study. Similarly, lysine and leucine among EAAS and glutamic acid in NEAAS were predominantly detected in all freshwater fish species of Indus River (Jabeen and Chaudhary, 2016). The present findings of amino acids composition were duly supported by Ashraf et al., (2011) in freshwater fishes. The lower content of all amino acids was observed for wild silver carp than farmed silver carp may be due to supply of artificial feed to the cultured species (Ashraf et al., 2011). The variation in the amino acid composition of species under study and those reported by other researchers may be because of different feed compositions, types of culture systems, environmental factors, physiology and morphology of fish species (Dogan and Ertan, 2017).
       
Therefore, the study inferred that the freshwater fish species may fulfill dietary requirements of EAAs of the human body and may help in alleviating nutritional disorders due to lack of amino acids to a certain extent.
According to the results of the current study, we conclude that freshwater fish species of Nagpur region of Maharashtra, India are a good source of essential and non-essential amino acids amino acids. The variation in nutrient composition was observed as fish are sourced from culture and wild environments as well. Natural and artificial diet, aquatic environment, habitat, physiology and morphology of fish influenced the nutrient composition of the fish. Nutrient information obtained in the present study provided insights into the nutritional value of these fish to consumers. The information would also be helpful to policymakers as well as health organizations to encourage fish consumption to achieve optimal health benefits to keep away nutritional disorders. The government should take steps to promote large-scale nutrition research and marketing of freshwater fish to sustain the fisheries sector as a whole.
The authors are thankful to Vice-Chancellor, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Dist-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India. The first author is also grateful to authorities of Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India for providing necessary facilities to conduct the research.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Abdulkarim, B., Bwathondi, P.O.J., Suleiman, M. and Ringim, A.S. (2017). A study on the amino acid profiles of five freshwater fishes commonly consumed in Tanzania. Journal of Zoological and Bioscience Research. 4(2): 1-6.

  2. Aberoumand, A. (2014). Preliminary studies on nutritive and organoleptic properties in processed fish fillets obtained from Iran. Food Science and Technology. 34(2): 287-291.

  3. AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edn, Washington, DC, USA.

  4. Ashraf, M., Zafar, A., Rauf, A., Mehboob, S. and Qureshi, N.A. (2011). Nutritional values of wild and cultivated silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 13(2): 210-214. http://www.fspublishers.org/publishedpapers/81694pdf

  5. Begum, A.M., Punom, N.J., Mostavi, E.E., Begum, K., Saha, M.L. and Rahman, M.S. (2019). Proximate composition, fatty acid and amino acid profile of striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus (Sauvage, 1878) cultured in Bangladesh.  Biores. Comm. 5(2): 715-724.

  6. Cardinal, M., Cornet, J., Donnay-Moreno, C., Gouygou, J.P., Bergé, J.P., Rocha, E., Soares, S., Escórcio, C., Borges, P. and Valente, L.M.P.  (2011). Seasonal variation of physical, chemical and sensory characteristics of sea bream (Sparus aurata) reared under intensive conditions in Southern Europe. Food Control. 22: 574-585. 

  7. Chakma, S., Rahman, M.A., Siddik, M.A., Hoque, M.S., Islam, S.M. and Vatsos, I.N. (2022). Nutritional profiling of wild (Pangasius pangasius) and farmed (Pangasius hypophthalmus) pangasius catfish with implications to human health. Fishes. 7(6): 309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ fishes7060309.

  8. Dogan, G. and Ertan, O.O. (2017). Determination of amino acid and fatty acid composition of goldband goatfish [Upeneus moluccensis (Bleeker, 1855)] fishing from the Gulf of Antalya (Turkey). Int Aquat. Res. 9(4): 313-327.

  9. Department of Fisheries (DoF), Maharashtra. (2022). Fish Production Report 2021-22. Retrieved from https://fisheries.maharashtra.gov.in/sites/default/files/FISH-PRODUCTION-REPORT-2021-22.pdf.

  10. Fawole, O.O., Ogundiran, M.A., Ayandiran, T.A. and Olagunju, O.F. (2007). Proximate and mineral composition in some selected freshwater fishes in Nigeria. International Journal of Food Safety. 9: 52-55.

  11. FAO. (2013). Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition. Report of an FAO Expert Consultation. Retrieved from http://www.nutrinfo.com/biblioteca/libro­_digital/fao-protein_quality.pdf. 92: 1-79.

  12. Herawati, V.E., Nugroho, R.A., Pinandoyo, H.J., Prayitno, B. and Karnaradjasa, O. (2018). The growth performance and nutrient quality of Asian swamp eel Monopterus albus in Central Java Indonesia in a freshwater aquaculture system with different feeds. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 27(6): 658-666.

  13. Holecek, M. (2020). Histidine in health and disease: Metabolism, physiological importance and use as a supplement. Nutrient. 12(3): 848. doi: 10.3390/nu12030848.

  14. Islam, M.N. and Joadder, M.R. (2005). Seasonal variation of the proximate composition of freshwater Gobi, Glossoqibius giuris (Hamilton) for river Padma. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 8(4): 532-536.

  15. Islam, S., Bhowmika, S., Majumdar, P.R., Srzednicki, G.B., Rahman, M.C. and Hossaain, M.A. (2021). Nutritional profile of wild, pond, gher and cage cultured tilapia in Bangladesh. Heliyon. 7(5): e06968. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06968.

  16. Jabeen, F. and Chaudhry, A. (2011). Chemical Compositions and fatty acid profiles of three freshwater fish species. Food Chem. 125: 991-996.

  17. Jabeen, F. and Chaudhary A.S. (2016). Nutritional composition of seven commercially important freshwater fish species and the use of cluster analysis as a tool for their classification. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 26(1): 282-290.

  18. Kim, J.Y., Burghardt, R.C. and Wu, G. (2011). Select nutrients in the ovine uterine lumen: VII. Effects of arginine, leucine, glutamine and glucose on trophectoderm cell signaling, proliferation and migration. Biol Report. 84: 62-69.

  19. Kocatepe, D. and Turan, H. (2012).  Proximate and fatty acid composition of some commercially important fish species from the Sinop Region of the Black Sea. Lipids. 47: 635- 641.

  20. Meybodi, N.M., Mirmoghtadaie, L., Sheidaei, Z. and Mortazavian, A.M. (2019). Wheat Bread: Potential approach to fortify its lysine content. Current Nutrition and Food Science. 15: 1-8.

  21. Memon, N.N., Talpur, F.N. and Bhanger, M.I. (2010). A comparison of proximate composition and fatty acid profile of Indus River fish species. International Journal of Food Properties. 13(2): 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910802398479.

  22. Monalisa, K., Islam, M.Z., Khan, T.A., Abdullah, A.T. and Hoque, M.M. (2013). Comparative study on nutrient contents of native and hybrid Koi (Anabas testudineus) and Pangas (Pangasius pangasius, Pangasius hypophthalmus) fish in Bangladesh. International Food Research Journal. 20(2): 791-797. 

  23. Mukundan, M.K., Radhakrishnan, A.G., Stephen, J. and Antony, P.D. (1986). Nutritional evaluation of some freshwater fishes. Fish Tech. 23: 189-195.

  24. Ondo, A.S., Kumulungui, B.S., Mewono, L., Koumbai, A.M. and Missang, C.E. (2013). Proximate composition and microbiological study of five marine fish species consumed in Gabon. African Journal of Food Science.  7(8): 227-231.

  25. Paul, B.N., Chanda, B. S., Sridhar, N. and Giri, S.S. (2018). Nutrient profile of five freshwater fish species. SAARC J. Agri. 16(2): 25-41.

  26. Rieuwpassa, F.J., Karimela, E.J., Cahyono, E., Tomasoa, A.M., Ansar, N.M.S., Tanod, W.A., Nadia, L.M.H., Ramadhan, W., Ilhamdy, A.F. and Rieuwpassa, F. (2022). Extraction and characterization of fish protein concentrate from Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Food Research. 6(4): 92-99.

  27. Sarma, D., Das, P.D., Das, P., Bishat, H.C.S., Akhtar M.S. and Ciji, A. (2015).  Fatty acid, amino acid and mineral composition of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) of Indian Himalaya. Indian J. Anim. Res. 49(3): 399-404. doi: 10.5958/ 0976-0555.2015.00104.1.

  28. Tilami, K.S. and Sampels, S. (2018). Nutritional value of fish: lipids, proteins, vitamins and minerals. Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture. 26(2): 243-25.

  29. Tilami, S. K., Sampels, S., Zajic, T., Krejsa, J., Masilko, J. and Mraz, J. (2018). Nutritional value of several commercially important river fish species from the Czech Republic. Peer J. 6: e5729. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5729.

  30. Wang, W.W., Wu, Z.L. and Dai, Z.L. (2013). Glycine metabolism in animals and humans: implications for nutrition and health. Amino Acids. 45(3): 463-477. doi: 10.1007/s00726-013- 1493-1.

  31. Yalçin, K. and Demet, K. (2014). Chemical composition and nutritional quality of scorpion fish (Scorpaena porcus, Linnaeus 1758) muscle. Indian J. Anim. Res. 48(1): 83-87. doi: 10.5958/j.0976-0555.48.1.018.

  32. Zula, A.T. and Desta, D.T. (2021). Fatty acid related health lipids index of raw and fried Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fish muscle. Journal of Food Quality. 5(9): 6676528. doi: 10.1155/2021/6676528.

Editorial Board

View all (0)