Among a total of 240 samples 10.42% (25/240) prevalence for
Salmonella was found including 6.67% (8/120) from intestinal samples and 14.17% (17/120) from neck meat showing highly significant (Pearson’s chi square test, P>.001) (Table 3). The phenotypic confirmation was done by confirming the specific colony characteristics on selective media including XLD, BGA and HEA agar plates. The presumptive colonies confirmed by biochemical characterization by IMViC which showed-ve, -ve, +ve, +ve reactions and on TSI agar slants were typical of
Salmonella ie alkaline slant and acidic butt and produced H
2S and isolates were negative for urease production test. All
Salmonella isolates exhibited swimming and swarming motility. The molecular confirmation by PCR for
invA gene given 284 bp specific band on agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig 1). Multiplex PCR for serotype identification indicated that all the 25 isolates were of
Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurirm (25/240) 10.4% (Fig 2). Out of all the virulence markers studied, all the isolates were found to carry
spiA gene, with the 500 bp band as shown in Fig 3, but no isolate was positive for other virulence genes
spvR and
spvC.
Antimicrobial resistance was assessed using phenotypic (disc diffusion method) and genotypic (PCR for drug resistance gene) approaches. Highest senstivity of the
Salmonella was found towards Co-Trimoxazole and Streptomycin that is 86% followed by 68% for Cefotaxime and Imepenum, Trimethoprim (59%), Azithromycin (55%), Tetracycline (33%), Ceftazidime (27%). All the isolates were resistant to Ampicillin, followed by Ciprofloxacin (77%), Tetracyclin (68%), Cefoperazone, Cefixime, Gentamicin (59%) (Fig 4). Phenotypic drug resistance was matching with the genotypically as 80 % isolates were positive for the
blaTEM gene, while for
AmpC and
tetA genes the positivity was 20% and 0%.
Emergence of MDR
Salmonella is one of the major concern and in this study the AMR pattern of isolated
Salmonella indicated that the 68% of isolated
Salmonella were multi drug resistant and showed resistance to one or more antibiotics of more than three group of antibiotics.
Correlation between the presence of Salmonella in meat and intestinal content
At the time of slaughter meat and intestinal content of the same goat were collected, to understand the correlation between the occurrence of
Salmonella in intestinal content and meat at a time. The results showed a significant correlation (0.468) at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) by pearson square method. It indicates the possibility of meat contamination due to internal infection (Table 4).
This study was conducted to detect the presence of
Salmonella infection in goat intestinal content and its meat which revealed overall 10.42 % occurrences of
Salmonella (6.67% (8/120) from intestinal content, 14.17% (17/120) in meat samples.
Mahindroo et al., 2019, reported the 7.7% prevalence of NTS from goat feces which is correspond to this study while in disagreement the goat meat prevalence was 1.57% only in comparatively (14.17%). In this study, prevalence of
Salmonella was higher in comparison to the prevalence reported by other studies, 0.7%
Molla et al., (2006), 2.5%
Zubair and Ibrahim, (2012), 3.3%
Dabassa and Bacha, (2012), 7.38%
Kuma et al., (2017), 9%
Naik et al., (2015) and lower than 17.6%
Chandra et al., (2006) and 20.5%
Paul et al., (2021). The variation in the difference in prevalence may be due to variation in hygienic conditions of the slaughter houses, sanitization of knife and chopping board used which may be the source of contamination and uses of antibiotics growth promoter in the goat feed for prevention of disease could be the reason. The only serotype detected was
S. Typhimurium, which is one of the most commonly occurring serotype.
Isolated
Salmonellae were screened for the presence of virulence genes such as
invA,
spiA, spvR and
spvC which involve both biofilm formation and virulence. Only
invA and
spiA gene were positive in isolated
Salmonellae, indicating their pathogenic potential. The
invA gene is most commonly used for the confirmation of
Salmonellae by PCR but it is also a potential virulence factor indicating invasiveness of the bacteria as it encodes essential proteins in bacterial cell membranes. The location of the gene is the
Salmonella Pathogenicity Island (SPI) in the DNA region is related to the pathogenicity of
Salmonella enterica and is present in almost all serotypes
(Lou et al., 2019). spvC gene was not present in any of the isolates and this gene is generally associated with the suppression of innate immunity in infected hosts and the systemic spread of
Salmonella (Wu et al., 2016).
The isolated
Salmonella showed high resistant to some antibiotics like cephalosporin groups which are critically important for clinical infections therapy in animal as well as humans. Presence of MDR
Salmonella in tested samples is of high concern particularly at emergency situations like food borne
Salmonella infection outbreaks
(Kolhe et al., 2020).
At the time of slaughter meat and intestinal content sample were collected from same goat, to understand the correlation between the occurrence of
Salmonella in intestinal content and meat. Significant correlation between
Salmonella positivity in meat and intestinal content, indicate the possibility of meat contamination due to internal infection. However, the positivity of
Salmonella was comparatively higher in meat than the intestinal content. It may be assumed that in absence of gastrointestinal infection, meat might be cross contaminated during various slaughtering processes. As in during sample collection it was observed that in most of slaughtering premises there were lack of hygiene and practices were not as per Good Production Practices (GPP). The recorded observations while collecting the samples indicated that in more than 70.8% places, the knife hygiene (disinfection of knife) for subsequent slaughter was not being followed. It may be the factor contributing in the cross contamination of meat. However other factors like various slaughtering practices might contribute in further contamination of meat. This might hugely contribute to the cross contamination and increased risk for human infection, even more than risk posed by consumption of pathogen harboring animal. Proper sanitation and use of clean water during the slaughtering and processing of meat can protect the meat from contamination (
Mkangara 2023).
Occupational exposure in persons engaged with handling the infected animals and their products should be identified and awareness among occupational groups need to be emphasized. There is a need of spreading awareness about food safety at every stratum of society, and its negligence might be devastative in terms of AMR emergence and occurrence of outbreaks.