The Mean body weight of chicks for the different periods revealed that there was a significant differences between supplement group and control group.
Effects on body weight
Assessment of dietary supplementation of Probeads-EC and probiotic in TANUVAS Aseel chicks are shown in table. The mean body weight of chicks for the different period revealed that there was a significant difference (P<0.05) between the groups (Table 1). It was 620 g in control group compared to 754 g in T2 and 724 g in T3 respectively. The results indicated that probiotic supplement has a significant role in improving digestion and thereby better absorption for higher growth rate in TANUVAS Aseel chicks.
Yan et al., (2017) reported that chicken supplemented with Bacillus species showed beneficial effects in body weight. Likely Supplementation of Probiotics mixture (Lactobacillus supergenes, Lacto bacillus acidophilus and Saccharomyces cerevisae) @ 0.5 g/kg feed had improved growth in broilers (
Kaoud, 2010). In cross bred cockerels, supplementation of 2-3 ml of probiotics protexin/L in drinking water had improved performance of chicken as reported by
(Khan et al., 2013).
Body weight and average daily weight gain revealed that there was significant difference (P<0.05) from 4
th weeks to 10
th weeks of trial between control and treated groups. It was 107 g, 118 g and 114 g respectively, for the control (T1) and Treatment (T2 and T3) groups for the 4
th week and similar trends were noticed up to 10
th week in TANUVAS Aseel chicks. Probeads Ec supplement (
Enterococcus faecalis,
Saccharomyces cervisae,
Bacillus subtilis,
Bacillus firmus and
Enterococcus farcium) in this feeding trails favored better nutrient utilization and thereby significant (P<0.05) increase in body weight and body weight gain in TANUVAS Aseel chicks compared to probiotic supplementation and control group. These finding are agreement with
Murugan et al., 2022 and
Wondimu and Yonad, 2020. They observed that feed supplementation had improved body weight gain in TANUVAS Aseel chicken. This could be due to probiotic supplement has a significant role in improving digestion and thereby better absorption.
Khan et al., (2019) studied birds were supplemented with corn-based diet. On day 35, birds were slaughtered to determine the relative weights of heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, gizzard and intestines. Results showed that supplementation of phytase enzymes affected the weight and length of small intestine and feed conversion ratio (FCR) and did not affect the other zoo technical variables like body weight, feed consumption and weight gain during the whole experimental period. Application of phytase failed to exert any influence on the weights of gizzard, provetriculus, heart, liver, spleen and empty intestine. The weights and lengths of the small intestine were highly significant (P>0.05) in the treatment groups. This study showed the potency of phytase to enhance the growth performance in broilers and it will lay foundation for future research on poultry feed in Pakistan.
Effects on daily feed intake
Average daily feed intake (Table 1) of TANUVAS Aseel chicks fed with probiotic supplemented diet and un supplemented diet as control from 2
th to 10
th week revealed that there was a significant difference (p<0.05) during 2
th to 10
th week like 22 g, 40 g, 45 g, 60 g and 70 g in control group respectively for the T2and T3. It was observed that control group consumed more feed than probeads EC and Probiotic supplement group. These findings were accordance with the finding of
Khan et al., (2013) who reported that Probiotic feeding at a level of 2 and 3 ml/l of drinking water decreased the feed intake significantly but
Swain et al., (2016) reported that feed intake was not affected by the supplement of probiotic. In the present study significant decrease of feed intake could be due to feed supplement promoted efficient development of muscle and weight gain results in improving digestion and thereby better absorption of essential nutrients and less feed intake.
Effect on feed conversion ratio
The average feed conversion ratio of chicks (Table 1) fed with Probeads Ec and Probiotic supplement revealed that significant feed efficiency noticed compared with control group (3.28±0.35 Vs 3.52±0.30). This could be due to alteration in the intestinal flora, enhancement of growth of non-pathogenic facultative anaerobic and gram positive bacteria forming lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide, suppression of growth of intestinal pathogens and enhancement of digestion and utilization of nutrients (
Yeo and Kim, 1997,
Shibi and Jayalalitha, 2022 and
Thangadurai and Venilla, 2022). These finding in accordance
Swain et al., (2016) reported that improvement in body weight gain and FCR of TANUVAS Aseel chicks fed Probeads Ec and Probiotic supplement through feed might be due to
Lactobacillus spp,
Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus faecium,
Aspergillusoryzae used in the supplement.
Effect on livability
In the present study no significant difference in mortality pattern (Table 1) was observed between the supplement and control group. This results in contrast with finding of
(Panda et al., 2000). Probiotic play a role in altering the balance of the gut microorganism thereby increasing the health and production performance of the birds apart from reducing in the incidence of disease who recorded lower mortality rate in desi birds as the intestinal immunity of the birds was boosted due to probiotic supplementation in feed
(Malik et al., 2008). Yadav and Jha (2019) reported use of probiotics, prebiotics, organic acids and exogenous enzyme, among others. Gut microbiota and their metabolic products improve nutrient digestion, absorption, metabolism and overall health and growth performance of poultry whereas
Yan et al., (2019) observed stronger chicken-fatty or fatty odour which directly improved the flavor. His finding suggested that probiotics can improve chicken meat flavor and increase gut microbiota diversity.
Effect on cost benefit analysis
Cost benefit analysis was presented in Table 2. The cost of production per bird for T1 is Rs.240.32±10.89 was lower than Rs.210.56±7.23 in T2 whereas Rs.220.12±6.38 in T3. The net profit per bird per month was higher in T2 compared to T3 and T1 were 43.33±2.18, 38.45±1.98 and 30.12±2.56 respectively as reported by
Swain et al., (2016) this could be due to higher weight gain and higher feed conversion efficiency of TANUVAS Aseel chicks.