Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 56 issue 10 (october 2022) : 1287-1294

​Fish Diversity, Conservation Status and its Relationships with Environmental Variables in Umtrew River System, Northeast, India

L.P. Mudoi1,*, H. Pokhrel1, S.K. Bhagabati1, R. Dutta1, A.M. Ahmed1, R. Sarmah1, D. Nath1
1Department of Aquatic Environment Management, College of Fisheries, Assam Agricultural University, Raha, Nagaon-782 103, Assam, India.
Cite article:- Mudoi L.P., Pokhrel H., Bhagabati S.K., Dutta R., Ahmed A.M., Sarmah R., Nath D. (2022). ​Fish Diversity, Conservation Status and its Relationships with Environmental Variables in Umtrew River System, Northeast, India . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 56(10): 1287-1294. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4921.
Background: River water and its faunal diversity are regarded as an integral part of the environmental stability and river ecosystem. To know the abundance and diversity of fin fishes in relation to their environmental parameters, a hilly river Umtrew in Meghalaya and Assam was investigated during January, 2019 to December, 2020. 

Methods: Fish, plankton and water samples were collected regularly at monthly intervals for a period of 24 months. Standard protocols were followed for analysis of the collected samples.

Result: A total of 49 fish species under 36 genera, 20 families and 10 orders were recorded. Among them Cypriniformes (42%) is the dominated order followed by Siluriformes (24%). As per IUCN status 1 species falls under critically endangered, 4 species are near threatened, 2 species under vulnerable and 42 species are of least concern. A significant correlation between species distribution and environmental variables was also reported. Our findings clearly oppose the tendency for species composition to increase from the source to the mouth of the river, which is probably prohibited by two major anthropogenic activities. These activities could constitute in the future a real threat for the fish population and other aquatic organisms.
Protection of the natural environment is one of the prime focus for preservation and conservation of living species. Unfortunately, throughout the World and in India in particular, aquatic ecosystems are continuously altered by human activities (Ahmed et al., 2013). This alteration is thought to play an important role in fish community structures and in other aquatic organisms (Resh et al., 1988; Poff and Ward, 1989) and may be responsible for extinction of numerous species.
       
Hilly river ecosystem and biodiversity is very important due to the source of origin of different colourful fin fishes which live in diversified habitats consisting of clay, sand, rock, gravel, stone and boulders. Habitat characteristics are correlated with presence and absence of fishes (Gorman and Karr, 1978). Again, water qualities of a river influence the fish diversity (Kow et al., 2016).
       
Among such Umtrew river system is one of the major river systems in Meghalaya and Assam, India, which supports a diverse range of flora and fauna making the river a valuable resource for the region. However, the river is facing tremendous pressure through many anthropogenic factors like construction of dams and constant dumping of municipal and industrial waste generated by industries (Pranjit et al., 2012). Thus, looking into the pathetic condition and with a hope for restoration of the river natural ecosystem present study was undertaken to evaluate the fish diversity and abundance in relationship to its environmental variables. This study might also be helpful to the researchers, fish managers and policy makers to understand the water quality and ichthyofaunal status of hill streams for its better management to maintain and sustain the running water ecosystem and its resources.
Study area
 
The river Umtrew is originated by the confluence of two streams, one of which originates near Mawrong hamlet on the Sohpetbneng Peak and the other one is the Umium dam’s outflow (Fig 1). These two streams meet at the Nongkhyllem Wildlife Sanctuary and run through Byrnih, a small town of Meghalaya. The river then enters into the state Assam at Sonapur, where it is known as Digaru until merging with the Brahmaputra near Chandrapur, Kamrup of Assam. River. The Digaru river covers a distance of about 30 km from the Umtrew hydroelectric power station and along its periphery numerus industries like cement, drinks, iron and PVC are located. At a latitude of 26o13'51.8"N and a longitude of 91o37'28.8"E, elevation ranging from 738.5 to 58 m when it meets the Kopili river, a tributary of the Brahmaputra.
 

Fig 1: GIS Map of umtrew river indicating sampling sites.


 
Collection of fish
 
Fish specimens were collected with the help of local fishermen by using cast net and gill net of different mesh sizes. The collected fish specimens were preserved in 10% formaldehyde in the Fish Museum of Department of Aquatic Environment Management, College of Fisheries, Assam Agricultural University, Raha, Nagaon. Morphological identification of the fish was done according to (Talwar and Jhingran, 1991; Jayaram, 2010; Pauly and Froese, 2012). Assessment conservation status of the fishes was carried out using IUCN Red list of threatened species (2014).
 
Plankton analysis
 
The plankton’s sample were collected and identified using standard methods (Santhanam, 1989; Philipose, 1967). Palmer index was for organic pollution was also calculated according to Palmer (1969).
 
Water quality analysis and habitat characterisation
 
Water samples was collected regularly on monthly intervals from January, 2019 to December, 2020. Physico-chemical parameters of water like water velocity using rheometer, surface water temperature, turbidity, pH, TDS, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity was estimated using water testing Kit (Systronics, Model Type 371), whereas alkalinity, hardness, Nitrite, Phosphate, BOD3 and COD were estimated according to (APHA, 2005; CPCB, 2001) using titration method. Other environmental variables like water depth, width, substrate types (mud, sand, clay, gravel, rock and leave-wood as percent of stream bottom surface covered by each substrate type at each sample site) were also measured in the same sites according to Kouamelan et al., (2003) where fishes were sampled.
 
Statistical analysis
 
Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) (Ter Braak, 1988) was used to examine a longitudinal gradient in species composition in the river system. All the average data are represented as mean±S.E. Statistical difference were considered significant when p<0.05. CCA analysis was preformed using the Palaeontological Statistics (PAST) Programme.
Fish diversity
 
During the present investigation a total of 49 fish species belonging to 36 genera, 20 families and 10 orders are recorded from 6 selected sampling stations of the river Umtrew, Maghalaya and Assam, India. The number and percentage composition of order and family under are shown (Table 1 and 2). Among the orders, the Cypriniformes formed the largest group with a contribution of 4 (20.00%) families, 15 (41.66%) genera and 21 (42.85%) species.  Similar kind of results were also reported by Umesh et al., 2012; Gurumayum et al., 2016; Kar et al., 2006 during the study of the different north-eastern rivers in India.
 

Table 1: Composition of fish community by order.


 

Table 2: Composition of fish community by family.


 
The IUCN conservation status of the 49 recorded species with their number under different category are shown in Table 3. The highest species were recorded under least concern (LC) category with a total no of 42 and contributed 85.71%. Under near threatened (NT) category Cyprinidae 2 (4.08%), Sissoridae and Alidae contributed 1 (2.38%) each (Table 3). Ramanujam et al., 2010 studied the ichthyofaunal diversity of the Khasi hills and found 68 species belonging 45 genera, 20 families and 6 orders. Where Cyprinidae was the most dominant group dominated by 30 species. The trophic level index indicates that most of the fishes are omnivore (48.97%) with their feeding habit followed by 26.53% for herbivore category and 24.48% for carnivore. According to Karr et al., (1987) the Umtrew river environment falls under poor category since more than 45% fish species comes under omnivore.
 

Table 3: Fish fauna of Umtrew river, their taxonomic status, trophic level, feeding habits, relative abundance and IUCN status.


 
Palmer index
 
The total score of Algal Genus Pollution Index (AGPI) of sites S1<S2<S3< S6<S5< S4 are calculated to be 3, 5, 8, 10, 11 and 13 respectively (Table 4). The score of S1, S2 and S3 indicates probable lack of organic pollution while S4, S5 and S6 showed moderate pollution which might be due to anthropogenic factors like human interference. Chlorella, Nitzschia and Synedra Closterium was found to be the most active participant in most of the sites which may be the good indicator of contaminated water. Oscillatoria was recorded repeatedly in station 4, 5 and 6 and consider as indicators of pollution in view of the results of Palmer pollution index.
 

Table 4: Pollution index of Algal genera level according to Palmer, (1969) at six sites of river Umtrew.


 
Seasonal discharge trends of the umtrew river
 
The variation of the water quality mainly depends on river regime, catchment characteristics and human activities which are system specific. The average water quality of Umtrew river showed that the pollution indicating parameters like BOD3 and COD values are higher than the optimum value given by BIS and WHO (Table 5). Besides BOD3 and COD values other parameters found under the congenial range indicate the that river water is preferable for ichthyofaunal diversity. Variations in the water quality parameters of the Umtrew river system might be due to heavy rainfall during the monsoon season which increases the volume of the river from the nearby catchment area.
 

Table 5: Comparative study of experimental water quality data with BIS and WHO (24 months average data).


 
Patterns of species composition in relation to environmental variables
 
The main pattern shown by the CCA is a longitudinal gradient in species composition. Forward selection and Monte Carlo permutation (199 iteration) allowed to identify 14 environmental variables accounting for 50% of the variance explained by 15 variables: width, velocity, oxygen, depth, mean% of leaves wood and% rocks (Table 6). These variables were considered as the best predictors of the species environmental relationships in the Umtrew River.  For data analysis, we considered the first two axis expressing the highest variability of species data. In the CCA performed, axis 1 (eigenvalue=0.48) and axis 2 (eigenvalue=0.14) expressed 72.01% of the cumulative variance in the species data.  Monte Carlo permutation tests showed that both axis were significant (p=0.005) (Fig 2). From these selected variables, DO, water velocity, pH, turbidity, BOD3, COD, width, Depth, Sand clay and mud and mean% of mixed leaves-wood in the substrate seem to be the important variables explaining longitudinal change in species composition both upstream and downstream gradient. In the present study, high mean% of leaves-wood, sand, clay and mud reflect a habitat located in river system. Based on CCA axis 1, there is a high correlation between position of sampling sites and position along an upstream-downstream gradient. In the river Tangon and Kulik, a similar result was found by Islam et al., (2017).
 

Table 6: Different environmental variables (in%).


 

Fig 2: Canonical correspondence analysis showing correlation between species composition and environmental variables.


 
Species distribution
 
Fishes were collected in all 6 sampling sites. Species composition differed from one site to another (Table 7). To study the longitudinal distribution of fishes, we used data from the main river sites only and followed the upper-lower gradient. Species composition was seen more in site 1, decreases from sites 2 to 4 and finally increases from site 5 to 6. The tendency for species composition to increase from the source to the mouth of the river has been widely observed by community ecologists (Kouamelan et al., 2003). However, following the upper-lower gradient of the main channel of the Umtrew River, we observed an irregular distribution of fishes. This is most likely due to the impact of different anthropogenic factors. In site 2 and 3, two dams (Kyrdemkulai and Umtrew) dam has been built to retain water for generation of electricity and other purpose uses. The immediate consequence of the construction of a dam, whatever its size in an aquatic ecosystem, is the modification of the hydrological regime, creating thus a lentic environment. This artificial lacustrine habitat is unfavourable to rheophilic species that migrate to the upper part of the river. Moreover, the discharge of industrial waste, sand and boulder mining activities were observed in sampling site 3 and 4, which cause serious affects in the freshwater ecosystem and consequently threatens fish biodiversity in the Umtrew River, which is also evident from the presence of some high tolerant fish species like Heteropneustes fossils in sampling site 4. Apart from the two major factors linked to human activities (dam construction and industrial pollution), degradation of the forest along the Umtrew River for creating space for industrial estate should be noted.
 

Table 7: List of freshwater fish species sampled in the Umtrew river system.

Results obtained allowed to note that species responded to the general environmental quality (water quality and environmental variables) of the freshwater aquatic ecosystem. Dam construction in the main channel and especially industrial pollution that may modify water quality, are major factors affecting fish assemblage in the Umtrew river, which was also evident from Palmer index. The present study is amongst the first step of a long process on freshwater fish conservation in Umtrew river system. For the success of this conservation process, the industrial estate and the local population must be informed of their responsibility in the alteration of the Umtrew River. For the benefit of a long-time conservation of freshwater and its natural resources in present river, it is essential that the government develop curricula at all levels of education (Family, School, University) that will ensure the understanding and maintenance of aquatic biodiversity. This will lead to active involvement of local communities in this important issue.
This study was carried out as a part of the “Himalayan Research Fellowship Programme” (Grant ID: GBPNI/NMHS/2017-18/HSF-04/600). The authors are highly grateful to National Mission on Himalayan Studies (NMHS), MOEFCC, Govt. of India and Nodal Institute GBPNIHESD for the financial assistance.
None.

  1. Ahmed, A.T.A., Rahman, N.M., Mondal, S. (2013). Biodiversity of hill stream fishes in Bangladesh. Zootaxa. 3700(2): 283- 292.

  2. A.P.H.A. (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st Edition, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC.

  3. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). (2001). Water quality status of yamuna river. ADSORBS/32/1999-2000, Annexure III. 115.

  4. Gorman, O.T. and Karr, J.R. (1978). Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecol. 59: 507-515.

  5. Gurumayum, S.D., Kosygin, L. and Tamang, L. (2016). Ichthyofaunal diversity of Arunachal Pradesh, India: A part of Himalaya biodiversity hotspot. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies. 4(2): 337-346.

  6. Islam, R., Mia, J. and Lithi, U.J. (2017). Spatial and temporal disparity of fish assemblage relationship with hydrological factors in two rivers Tangon and Kulik, Thakurgaon, Bangladesh. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 17(6): 1209-1218.

  7. IUCN, S. (2014). IUCN SSC guidelines for minimizing the negative impact to bats and other cave organisms from guano harvesting. Ver. 1: 3.

  8. Jayaram, K.C. (2010). The Freshwater Fishes of the Indian Region. 2nd Edition, Narendra Publishing House, Delhi. 616.

  9. Kar, D., Nagarathna, A.V., Ramachandra, T.V. and Dey, S.C. (2006). Fish diversity and conservation aspects in an aquatic ecosystem in Northeastern India. Zoos’ Print Journal. 21(7): 2308-2315.

  10. Karr, J.R., Yant, P.R., Fausch, K.D., Schlosser, I.J. (1987). Spatial and temporal variability of the index of biotic integrity in three midwestern streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 116(1): 1-11.

  11. Kouamelan, E.P., Teugels, G.G., Ndouba, V., Goore Bi, G., Kone, T. (2003). Fish diversity and its relationships with environmental variables in a West African basin. Hydrobiologia. 505(1): 139-146.

  12. Kow, V.C.K., Said, M.I.M., Mohamed, M., Sabri, S. (2016). Relationship between water quality and fish diversity in four rivers of Johor. Int’l Journal of Advances in Chem. Engg. Biol. Sci. (IJACEBS). 3(1): 3-5.

  13. Palmer, C.M. (1969). A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. Journal of Phycology. 5(1): 78-82.

  14. Pauly, D., Froese, R. (2012). Comments on FAO’s State of Fisheries and Aquaculture, or ‘SOFIA 2010’. Marine Policy. 36(3): 746-752.

  15. Philipose, M.T. (1967). Chlorococcales, ICAR. New Delhi. 356.

  16. Poff, N.L., Ward, J.V. (1989). Implication of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: A regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 46: 1805-1818.

  17. Pranjit, K.S., Kalyanjit, S., Arup, K.D., Ankita, S., Pradeep, K.M. and Prem, K.C. (2012). Characterization and evaluation for integrated development of Umtrew river basin in Meghalaya Plateau, North East India. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning. 5(16): 437-448.

  18. Ramanujam, S.N., Manorama, M. and Dey, S. (2010). Ichthyodiversity of Meghalaya: India. Electronic Journal of Ichthyology. 2: 15-26.

  19. Resh, V.H., Brown, V., Covich, A.P., Gurtz, M.E., Li, H.W., Minshall, G.W., Reice, S.R., Sheldon, A.L., Wallace, J.B., Wissmar, R. (1988). The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J.N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 433-455.

  20. Santhanam, R., Ramanathan, N., Venkataramanujam, K.V., Jegatheesan, G. (1989). Phytoplankton of the Indian seas. As aspects of Marine Botany. Daya Publishing House, Delhi. 127.

  21. Talwar, P.K., Jhingran, A.G. (1991). Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries. Oxford-IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. 1158.

  22. Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1988). Partial Canonical Correspondence Analysis. In: Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis. [Bock, H.H. (ed.)], North Holland, Amsterdam. 551-558.

  23. Umesh, C.G., Sudip, K.B., Dilip, B., Konthoujam, S., Bishnupriya, S. and Kimneilam, C. (2012). Fish diversity of North East India, inclusive of the Himalayan and Indo Burma biodiversity hotspots zones: A checklist on their taxonomic status, economic importance, geographical distribution, present status and prevailing threats. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation. 4(15): 592-613.

Editorial Board

View all (0)