In the expt. 1, r-DDGS significantly depressed body weight of chicks at 3 and 6 weeks of age (Table 2). Rice-based DDGS was found safe for broiler chicken upto 12.5%, while at further higher level of 15%, significant depression in growth was reported
(Dinani et al., 2019), but when used at 12.5% in combination with rice gluten meal (15%) adverse effects were noticed on the intestinal histomorphometry and microbiology
(Dinani et al., 2018). Lysine concentration at either 110 or 120% of normal (100%) level showed no effect on body weight at 3 weeks, whereas Met supplementation over and above the normal concentration significantly (P<0.05) improved body weight, which was on par with that of control group at 110% and the body weight at 120% Met concentration was intermediate between control and r-DDGS with normal amino acid level (100%) groups. At 6 weeks of age, body weight of chicks fed r-DDGS was significantly (P<0.05) improved at 110 and 120% Met concentration, while the response with Lys supplementation in excess was intermediate.
Kim et al., (2009) recorded low standardised ileal digestibility of all the indispensable amino acids in corn-DDGS in comparison to soyabean meal in pigs. In broiler chickens, apparent ileal digestibility of Lys and Met was reduced with corn-DDGS inclusion in diet
(Foltyn et al., 2014).
Amino acids in DDGS are known to be less digestible to chickens causing their deficiency when DDGS is used in diet
(Stein et al., 2006). Thus the poor growth rate observed in the current study with 15% r-DDGS alongwith the improvement recorded with amino acid supplementation over and above the normal levels could be attributed to the low amino acid digestibility of r-DDGS, more particularly that of Met. Lysine digestibility of corn-DDGS was reported to be similar to that of corn in broiler chicks
(Lumpkins and Batal, 2005), which could probably explain the reasons for lack of response to Lys supplementation as recorded in the current study. On the contrary,
Fastinger et al., (2006) found decreased Lys availability in dark colored corn-DDGS, indicating the negative effects of excess heating during drying on the Lys availability in roosters. These conflicting results could be due to the differences in source of raw material used
(Stein et al., 2006) and the process involved in the production of DDGS.
Feed intake was not affected at both 3 and 6 weeks of age. Feed conversion efficiency was significantly lowered by r-DDGS feeding at both 3 and 6 weeks of age, which could be attributed to its poor digestibility. Increased Met concentration in diets containing r-DDGS significantly (P<0.05) improved the feed conversion efficiency, which was similar to that of control group at both the ages. The dressing yields and weights of abdominal fat and organs were not affected (Table 3). Similarly, the serum total protein concentration and HI titres against ND virus were also not affected by the experimental diets.
In the expt. 2, r-DDGS inclusion in diet at 15% significantly (P<0.05) reduced body weight of chicks at both 3 and 6 weeks of age (Table 4). Additional supplementation of Lys alone (110%) did not improve body weight in the groups fed r-DDGS either at 3 or 6 weeks of age. However, Met concentration at 110% resulted in significantly (P<0.05) higher body weight of chicks at 3 weeks of age than that of non-supplemented r-DDGS group and comparable to that of the r-DDGS-free control group. However, effect of Met supplementation at excess level on BW was non-significant at 6 weeks of age. On the other hand, the body weight of chicks with Met supplementation at 110% in combination with Lys (110%) at 3 weeks as well as at 6 weeks of age was intermediate between the non-supplemented r-DDGS fed group and the control (no r-DDGS) group and comparable to that of the Met alone group indicating no added advantage of Lys supplementation over and above the normal level of supplementation. Feed intake at 2 weeks was significantly (P<0.05) higher in the groups fed r-DDGS compared to control and the additional supplementation of Lys and Met showed no effect.
Feed conversion efficiency was significantly (P<0.05) poor with r-DDGS alongwith normal Lys and Met concentration. Methionine supplementation at 110% either alone or in combination with Lys significantly (P<0.05) improved FCR, which was comparable with that of control at 3 weeks and on par with control at 6 weeks of age. The results indicate beneficial effects of excess Met supplementation on feed conversion efficiency in the chicks fed r-DDGS, whereas supplementation of Lys alone at additional level showed only marginal improvement in FCR. As detailed earlier in the paper, the improved growth rate and feed conversion efficiency recorded in the study with Met supplementation in excess were probably due to the poor digestibility of r-DDGS in chicks.
Dressing yields and weights of organs were not affected, except for abdominal fat and spleen weight (Table 5). Abdominal fat content increased with r-DDGS feeding and Met supplementation (110%) significantly (P<0.05) decreased to a level, which was similar (when supplemented alone) or comparable (in combination with Lys) to the control group. Increased abdominal fat content with r-DDGS was probably a result of impaired fat metabolism and Met in excess could counter the same through its role in limiting body fat deposition
(Andi, 2012) by way of reducing the activity of fatty acid synthase (lipogenesis) and increasing the activity of hormone sensitive lipase (lipolysis)
(Takahashi and Akiba, 1995). Spleen weight, though was significantly affected, no trend could be observed. Serum concentration of total protein and cholesterol was not affected by the dietary treatments.