A Method for Authentication of Meat by PCR Amplification of Species-specific Markers of Mitochondrial Origin

DOI: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4125    | Article Id: B-4125 | Page : 780-785
Citation :- A Method for Authentication of Meat by PCR Amplification of Species-specific Markers of Mitochondrial Origin.Indian Journal of Animal Research.2021.(55):780-785
R. Thomas, M. Saikia, S. Singha, Z. Baruah, R. Kalita, N. Saharia, S. Rajkhowa thomasrlpt@gmail.com
Address : Food Quality Control Laboratory, ICAR-National Research Centre on Pig, Rani, Guwahati-781 131, Assam, India.
Submitted Date : 30-03-2020
Accepted Date : 11-01-2021


Background: Adulteration of meat with their cheaper or inferior counterparts has become a common practice in the meat industry which threatens the feelings as well as the health of the people. Meat adulteration has issues relating to social, religious, economic, and public health. Therefore, it is important to develop simple and reliable techniques for the authentication of species of meat. Mitochondrial markers have been widely used in species identification and authentication as PCR of species-specific markers of mitochondrial origin is relatively rapid, accurate, sensitive and cost-effective as compared to other PCR based assays. The present study was carried out for authentication of raw and cooked meat from different species using PCR amplification of species-specific Cytb and D-loop markers of mitochondrial origin.
Methods: In this study, detection of different raw meat viz. beef, carabeef, mutton, chevon, chicken, duck meat and dog meat as well as meat samples subjected to different processing temperatures was done using PCR of species-specific mitochondrial Cytb and D-loop markers. Samples of beef, carabeef, mutton, chevon, chicken, duck meat and dog meat were collected randomly from different locations of the North-Eastern region of India. The meat samples were subjected to heat treatment in hot water (80oC) to have 75oC core temperature. They were also cooked in steam to have the core temperature of 95oC. The samples were also subjected to autoclaving at a temperature of 121oC and 15 lb pressure. 
Result: The markers used in this study successfully amplified unique fragments for beef, carabeef, mutton, chevon, chicken, duck meat and dog meat. The sizes of the amplified products were 126 bp for beef, 226 bp for carabeef, 254 bp for mutton, 453 bp for chevon, 256 bp for chicken, 292 bp for duck meat and 100 bp for dog meat. The results were consistent in the meat samples which were subjected to different cooking temperatures ranging from 75-121oC. Consequently, these markers were validated for cross-amplification by checking them with other meat samples and no amplifications were observed in non-target species. The results suggested that all the markers were highly specific for the target species. The simplicity, sensitivity and stability of the assay indicated that this method could be very useful for meat authentication and thereby to detect adulteration. 


Authentication Adulteration Mitochondrial DNA Species-specific marker


  1. Arvanitoyannis, I.S. and Van Houwelingen-Koukaliaroglou, M. (2003). Implementation of chemometrics for quality control and authentication of meat and meat products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 43: 173-218.
  2. Boore, J.L. (1999). Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 27: 1767-1780.
  3. Chvez, N.A., Salinas, E., Jauregui, J., Palomares, L.A., Macas, K. (2008). Detection of bovine milk adulterated with cheese whey by western blot immunoassay. Food and Agricultural Immunology. 19: 265-272.
  4. De, S., Brahma, B., Polley, S., Mukherjee, A., Banerjee, D., Gohaina, M., Singh, K.P., Singh, R. Datta, T.K., Goswami, S.L. (2011). Simplex and duplex PCR assays for species specific identification of cattle and buffalo milk and cheese. Food Control. 22: 690-696.
  5. Girish, P.S., Anjaneyulu, A.S.R., Biswas, K.N., Anand, M., Rajkumar, N., Shivakumar, B.M., Sarma, B. (2004). Sequence analysis of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene can identify meat species. Meat Science. 66: 551-556.
  6. Girish, P.S., Anjeneyulu, A.S.R., Viswas, K.N., Santosh, F.H., Bhilegaonkar, K.N., Agarwal, R.K. (2007). Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism of mitochondrial 12S r RNA gene: A simple method for identification of poultry meat species. Veterinary Research Communications. 31: 447-455.
  7. Haunshi, S., Basumatary, R., Girish, P.S., Doley, S., Bardoloi, R.K., Kumar, A. (2009). Identification of chicken, duck, pigeon and pig meat by species-specific markers of mitochondrial origin. Meat Science. 83: 454-459.
  8. Hazra, T., Sharma, V., Sharma, R., De, S., Arora, S., Lal, D. (2017). Detection of cow milk paneer in mixed/buffalo milk paneer through conventional species specific polymerase chain reaction. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 51: 962-966.
  9. Ilhak, O.I. and Arslan, A. (2007). Identification of meat species by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science. 31: 159-163.
  10. Ioannis, S.A. and Nikolaos, E.T. (2005). Implementation of quality control methods in conjunction with chemometrics toward authentication of dairy products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 45: 231-249.
  11. Karlsson, A.O. and Holmlund, G. (2007).Identification of mammal species using species-specific DNA pyro sequencing. Forensic Science International. 173: 16-20.
  12. Kim, Y.K., Lee, C.H., Lee, Y.D., Han, S.H. (2019). Development of species-specific PCR for the identification of three grouper fish species (Epinephelus septemfasciatus, E. bruneus and E. akaara). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53: 482-484.
  13. King, N.L. (1984). Species identification of cooked meats by enzyme staining of isoelectric focusing gels. Meat Science. 11: 59-72.
  14. Maede, D. (2006). A strategy for molecular species detection in meat and meat products by PCR-RFLP and DNA sequencing using mitochondrial and chromosomal genetic sequences. European Food Research Technology. 224: 209-217.
  15. Martin, R., Ubrdale, R.J., Jones, S.J., Hernandez, Y.E., Patterson, R.L.S. (1991). Monoclonal antibody sandwich ELISA for the potential detection of chicken meat in mixtures of raw beef and pork. Meat Science. 30: 23-31.
  16. Nischala, S. (2016). Detection of mutton and chevon by PCR assay using Cyt-b gene primers. Ph.D thesis, P.V. Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University, Hyderabad, India. 56p.
  17. Panwar, N., Gahlot, G.C., Gahlot, K., Ashraf, M., Singh, A. (2015). Rapid identification of goat (Capra hircus) and sheep (Ovis aries) species in raw meat using duplex PCR assay. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 49: 537-541.
  18. Rahman, M.M., Ali, M.E., Hamid, S.B.A., Mustafa, S., Hashim, U., Hanapi, U.K. (2014). Polymerase chain reaction assay targeting cytochrome b gene for the detection of dog meat adulteration in meatball formulation. Meat Science. 97: 404-409. 
  19. Rastogi, G.R., Dharne, M.S., Walujkar, S., Kumar, A., Patole, M.S., Shouche, Y.S. (2007). Species identification and authentication of tissues of animal origin using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Meat Science. 76: 666-674.
  20. Sambrook, J. and Russell, D.W. (2001). Molecular Cloning - A Laboratory Manual (3rded.). New York: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press.
  21. Sosa, M.J.F., Pesini, R.E., Montaya, J., Roncales, P., Perez, M.J.L., Martos, P.A. (2000). Direct and highly species specific detection of pork meat and fat in meat products by PCR amplification of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 48: 2829-2832.
  22. Unseld, M., Beyermann, B., Brandt, P., Hiesel, R. (1995). Identification of the species origin of highly processed meat products by mitochondrial DNA sequences. PCR Methods Applications. 4: 241-243.
  23. Waghray, K., Gulla, S., Thyagarajan, P., Vinod, G. (2011). Adulteration pattern in different food products sold in the twin cities of Hyderabad and Secunderabad-India. Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research. 30: 117-121.

Global Footprints