P. damselae subsp.
damselae is an autochthonous member of aquatic ecosystems. It is considered as primary pathogen of several species of wild fish (damselfish, catfish, shark, stingray,
etc.) as well as commercially important fish species in mariculture, causing wound infections and hemorrhagic septicemia
(Fouz et al., 1992). The present study hypothesized that there exist potential for the bacteria to transmit from wild caught fishes to cage cultured fishes. The pathogenic potential of transmitted bacteria on cage culture fishes also been revealed.
Bacterial identification
The bacterial colonies isolated from spleen, kidneys and liver of wild caught and cage culture fishes was inoculated on TCBS agar at 24°C for 1-2 days. In total, 289 green colonies were isolated on TCBS agar. Out of which sixty one isolates were found gram negative, rod-cocci, motile organisms, oxidation/Fermentation test positive and arginine and lysine decarboxylase production, growing in 3% and 6% Nacl and urease production (Table 2)
. The previous researcher also confirmed that the presence of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae when three or more positive results were obtained in the following tests: LDC, motility, TCBS growth and urease production
(Holt et al., 1994; Zorrilla et al., 1999; Rajan et al., 2003; Thyssen et al.,1998).
Molecular identification
The multiplex PCR assay was carried out with 16S rRNA gene and
ureC gene binding primers. A total of 289 isolates were selected from infected fish, representing different organs and different locations. The expected amplicon sizes were 267bp and 448bp (corresponding to an internal fragment of the 16S rRNA gene and one of the
ureC genes respectively). A total of 61 isolates were positive for both 16S rRNA gene and
ureC gene. No isolates were positive for the 16S rRNA gene (267bp) alone indicating the absence of
P. damselae subsp.
piscicida (Fig 1).
Osorio et al., (2000) reported the multiplex-PCR using two primer pairs directed to internal regions of the 16S rRNA and
ureC genes, was employed to differentiate between the subspecies of
P. damselae.
Labella et al., (2006) observed two amplification bands of 267bp and 448bp in the multiplex- PCR assay demonstrated that the isolates from redbanded seabream are members of the
P. damselae subsp.
damselae. The 30 PCR product selected based on species wise thickness of PCR generated by the 16S rRNA (1500bp) gene primers was sequenced by outsourcing to MWG, Eurofins Genomics India Pvt Lt Bangalore, India.
Prevalence of P. damselae subsp. damselae isolates from wild and cage culture fishes
The prevalence of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae isolates are presented in Table 3. A total of 61
P. damselae subsp.
damselae were identified from 289 isolates of bacteria collected from different fish samples. Out of all
P. damselae subsp.
damselae 86.91% isolates were found in wild caught fishes and 13.09% in cage cultured fishes collected from South east coast of India. Highest number of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae were obtained from wild caught parrot fish samples (55.73%) followed by wild
Lutjanus sp. (22.95%). Of the 61 isolates obtained, 9.83% were from seabass cultured in cages. The lowest number of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae (0.35%) was isolated from cage grouper and eightband butterflyfish. The more amounts of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae isolates present in parrot fish when compared to cage culture fishes was noticed. Similarly, studies noticed high bacterial loads in parrot fish tissues when compared to other marine fish species
(Tarnecki et al., 2016). This suggests that their feeding behavior found correlated with the abundance of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae in parrot fish. It has been noticed that gut microbiota of coral reef associated fishes contains more amount of
Photobacterium. The parrot fish feeding on coral reef, seagrass and algae
(Smriga et al., 2010). Eissa et al., (2018) also reported total prevalence of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae among naturally infected marine fishes was 45.04%.
Essam et al., (2016) reported that total prevalence of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae in naturally infected fishes was 20.76%. The low bacterial presence in cage culture fishes might be due to the reason that hatchery produced seeds may devoid of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae. Once the fishes were introduced into the cage environment, it becomes more vulnerable to
P. damselae subsp.
damselae infection
(Essam et al., 2016). The reason for Cross-contagion between cage and wild fish species with shared pathogens may occur either through movement of individual fish or through species-specific migrations. Unlike parasitic pathogens, bacteria seem to exhibit higher potential to spread between wild and cage fish. Infected wild fish might also transfer pathogens to the cage fish. This co-infection process leads to a large variety of shared pathogens among wild and cage fish, while the various pathways of pathogen transmission increase the potential for infection and render epidemiological risk management difficult
(Diamant et al., 2007) Therefore, the present study suggests that proper site selection and screening of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae in the cage culture environment before incorporating cages in the natural environment is very much necessary to avoid the
P. damselae subsp.
damselae infection and associated fish mortality.
Dendrogram analysis of P. damselae subsp. damselae isolates from wild caught and cage culture fishes
A cluster analysis of the pairwise distance matrix among patterns was performed using the unweighted pair group method with average linkage (UPGMA) (
Sneath and Sokal, 1973). The dendrogram obtained after numerical analysis with the Dice coefficient and UPGMA method (Fig 2, 3, 4 and 5) shown that all patterns shared more than 50% similarity. The isolates (MP66, MP147 and MP157) showed 87% similarity, will belong to same genogroup. The isolate no MP66 isolated from eightband butterflyfish collected at marine ornamental fish farm, Mandapam. MP147 and MP 157 isolate in wild caught parrot fish collected from south east coast of India. The dendrogram obtained after numerical analysis with the Dice coefficient and UPGMA method shows that all patterns shared more than 45% similarity
(Botella et al., 2002). The isolates (MP189, MP190, MP191, MP193 and MP194) are one genogroups showed 85% similarity. All isolates were collected from wild caught parrot fish. The isolate (MP162, MP189 and MP190) belongs to one genogroup and showed 70% similarity. MP162 isolate collected from cage culture seabass in Mandapam. MP189 and MP190 isolate collected from wild caught fishes. So, these isolates showed abundance in both wild caught and cage culture fishes.
Regev et al., (2020) revealed that all detected Vibrio strains were divided into four different genogroups of
Vibrio sp., with an overlap in one group between the wild and the cultured species. This may suggest a spontaneous transmission between the wild and the cage fish. The first group showed high similarity to
V. parahaemolyticus and
V. alginolyticus. The second group showed high similarity to
V. harveyi. The third group contained only one strain that belonged to the Lessepsian fish
S. lessepsianus, which showed similarity to uncultured Vibrionaceae bacterium isolated from pinfish (
Lagodon rhomboids), with a 95% homology. In addition, the fourth group contained three identical strains all belonging to the cultured
S. aurata from 2017 without any similar references. The thirty out of sixty isolates (20% or 50%) showed their presence in both wild caught and cage cultured fishes. The presence of similar genogroup in both wild and cage cultured fishes confirmed the horizontal transfer of these bacteria from wild caught fishes to cage cultured fishes. Similarly reports from various countries also showed horizontal transfer
(Chiu et al., 2013). Therefore, it is suggested that while selecting sites for cage culture, the place which showed abundance in reef associated fishes should be neglected to avoid
P. damselae subsp.
damselae infection.
Pathogenicity study
Clinical signs and mortality
Pathogenicity of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae strain to damsel fish was investigated using standard protocols and the LD
50 was calculated. After injection, the first three days of post challenge no fishes showed symptoms, but fourth and fifth days of post challenge, reduced feed intake was noticed. Six days of post challenge, infected fish developed clinical signs such as lethargy, discolouration of skin, followed by abnormal swimming before mortality. By day 7, the 100% cumulative mortality was observed in damselfish injected with two higher concentrations of bacteria (Fig 7). As compared to infected fish, no clinical signs and mortality were noticed in control fish injected with saline solution.
Mahmoud et al., (2018) has done the pathogenicity assay and revealed that
P. damselae subsp.
damselae, were pathogenic for seabass at LD50 of (1.5×10
8 CFU/g body weight), causing 66.67% mortality. Infected seabass showed ulcers and hemorrhages all over the body with fin erosions and pale gills
(Mahmoud et al., 2018). Love et al., (1981) discussed with ulcers typically occur in the region of the pectoral fin and caudal peduncle of naturally infected damselfish and may reach 5-20 mm in diameter. LD
50 value of this injected culture of
P. damselae subsp.
damselae strain was calculated to be 2.48x10
3 CFU/mL. Bacteria were re-isolated from the kidney, spleen and liver of moribund fish (Fig 6) and the tissue extracts were directly analysed for the presence of injected pathogen by means of multiplex PCR and the results are given in Fig 8. It has confirmed that mortality and the clinical sign developed in the experimental fish was due to
P. damselae subsp.
damselae.
Histopathological findings
Histopathology was carried out from moribund fish tissues such as kidney, liver, spleen and gill (Fig 9). In kidney, tubular epithelial fusion and hyperplasia of haematopoietic tissue, hyperactivity of melanomacrophage centers and coagulative necrosis of epithelial lining of some renal tubules and glomerulonephritis was noticed (Fig 7). Similarly,
P. damselae subsp.
damselae infected fish kidneys showed congestion of blood vessels, necrosis of renal tubules and hyperplasia of melanomacrophage centres
(Eissa et al., 2018, Mladineo et al., 2006). The presence of highly dense clusters of bacteria in the kidney in seabass suggested that kidney should be microbiologically examined in a first attempt
(Avci et al., 2013). Gills of infected damselfish showed destructive changes in both primary and secondary lamellae, collapsed and curled secondary lamellae, lamellar fusion and hyperplasia.
Essam et al., (2016) investigated the histological alterations in gills were characterized by changes in both primary and secondary lamellae, collapsed and curled secondary lamellae, edema in filaments, severe lamellar aneurism and hyper activation of goblet cells. These sever lesions in the gills suggests their primary role in the bacterial entrance into the fish body. Hence, the study suggest that
P. damselae subsp.
damselae isolates from wild caught fishes found virulent to the culture fishes and cause severe tissue damage and mortality to the individuals.