Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 54 issue 2 (february 2020) : 209-215

Evaluation of sevoflurane and isoflurane as maintenance agent in buffaloes after glycopyrrolate-xylazine-butorphanol-propofol anaesthesia 

R.N. Chaudhary1,*, Rishi Tayal1
1Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Hisar-125 004, Haryana, India.
Cite article:- Chaudhary R.N., Tayal Rishi (2019). Evaluation of sevoflurane and isoflurane as maintenance agent in buffaloes after glycopyrrolate-xylazine-butorphanol-propofol anaesthesia . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 54(2): 209-215. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3748.
The study was aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of isoflurane and sevoflurane as maintenance agent in a balanced anaesthetic combination for buffaloes undergoing diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy. Twelve clinical cases of diaphragmatic hernia in female buffaloes were randomly selected and assigned to two groups (PS and PI) of six animals each. After premedication with glycopyrrolate, xylazine and butorphanol, induction was done with propofol. For maintenance, either sevoflurane (PS) or isoflurane (PI) was used with oxygen through a partial rebreathing system. Clinical, physiological, behavioral, haematological and biochemical parameters were recorded at different intervals. No significant differences were observed in maintenance scores, degree of muscle relaxation as well as haematological and blood biochemical parameters between the groups. The heart and respiratory rates were observed to be less depressed in PS than in PI. The recovery and standing with ataxia in PS was significantly earlier than the PI. Both isoflurane and sevoflurane were found to be safe and effective maintenance anaesthetic agents for buffaloes undergoing diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy; however, the sevoflurane was assessed to be slightly better as maintenance agent because of faster recovery and lesser cardiovascular depression than isoflurane.
Diaphragmatic hernia (DH) is a serious digestive disorder of recently parturited or pregnant buffaloes causing huge economic losses to farmers and livestock owners. Surgical correction of DH in buffaloes is a two stage procedure (Krshnamurthy et al., 1985). Laparo-rumenotomy through left flank under paravertebral block is followed by diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy under general anaesthesia. The buffaloes reported for diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy usually belong to category III or IV of ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists). Also, supine position in buffaloes during trans-abdominal approach for diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy results in a “low pressure-low flow” circulatory state which is aggravated during pregnancy (Peshin et al., 1987). So, an anaesthetic protocol having least depression on the cardiopulmonary system is highly desired. Balanced anaesthetic combination of glycopyrrolate-xylazine-butorphanol-Propofol produces smooth and rapid anaesthesia followed by quiet and excitement free recovery in buffalo calves for short duration (Potaliya et al., 2015). For longer duration surgeries continuous infusion or repeated top up doses of propofol are required (Hall and Peshin, 1996). The metabolism and elimination of propofol increase the stress on already compromised liver (Cagnardi et al., 2009); whereas isoflurane and sevoflurane have very little metabolism inside the body (Steffy et al., 2015). At present, isoflurane is the most widely used inhalant agent in veterinary anaesthesia but sevoflurane, a non-irritant inhalant, is gaining popularity due to its even lesser blood gas partition coefficient which provides more rapid induction and recovery from anaesthesia and a rapid alteration of anaesthetic depth (Kazama and Ikeda, 1988; Seller et al., 2013). Also, sevoflurane appears to offer a more stable heart rate profile in animals (Ebert et al., 1995). Isoflurane has been used as a safe and effective maintenance agent in water buffalo in experimental (Singh et al., 2013) as well as clinical studies (Bodh et al., 2015) but no information is available on the use of sevoflurane in water buffaloes. So, the present investigation was planned to compare the efficacy and safety of sevoflurane and isoflurane in clinical cases of buffaloes undergoing diaphragmatic herniorrhaphy.
The study was conducted on 12 clinical cases of DH in buffaloes aged 2-6 years and weighing 220Kg to 470Kg. These animals were randomly assigned in two groups of six animals each. All the buffaloes were premedicated with glycopyrrolate (0.01 mg/kg, IM) followed by xylazine (0.05 mg/kg, IM) and then butorphanol (0.03mg/kg, IV) at intervals of 10 minutes (Potaliya et al., 2015).  At the onset of ataxia, animals were restrained in lateral recumbency on a padded operation table and intubated after induction with propofol (1.3mg/kg, IV). Endotracheal tube was connected to the large animal anaesthesia machine for maintenance of general anaesthesia using isoflurane (group PI) or sevoflurane (group PS) in oxygen through an agent specific vaporizer and partial rebreathing system. Concentrations of these agents in inhalant mixtures were regulated to maintain adequate depth of anaesthesia by monitoring body reflexes and animal’s response to surgical stimulation. Inhalation of anaesthetic agent was discontinued after the last skin suture. All the animals were administered Ringer’s lactate and normal saline throughout the period of surgery.
        
The clinical and behavioral observations were recorded using blindfold method. The physiological parameters were recorded before rumenotomy, next day before premedication, at 5 min of induction, at 15 min and 30 min of start of inhalation, at recovery and at 24 hours of recovery. Blood samples were also collected in triplicate from the jugular vein at every designated interval of clinical observation for haematology, biochemistry and glucose estimation in EDTA, heparin and sodium fluoride, respectively. Haematology including haemoglobin (Hb), packed cell volume (PCV), total leucocytes count (TLC) and differential leucocytes count (DLC) were estimated in haematology analyzer 1MS4 from blood in EDTA vials. Plasma was harvested from remaining vials by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 20 min and then stored at -20°C. Blood biochemical parameters viz. glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), direct bilirubin, plasma urea, creatinine, total plasma proteins and albumin were analyzed with 2EM 200™ chemistry analyzer using commercially available 3Transasia XL kits while sodium, potassium, chloride and calcium were analyzed by automatic electrolyte analyser 4EasylyteTM.
        
For clinical observations, a fixed criterion as per Bodh et al., (2015) was followed for evaluation of quality of anaesthesia. Scoring was done to assign numerical values starting from 1 to 4 (1-poor, 2-fair, 3-good, 4-excellent) for premedication quality, induction quality, maintenance quality and recovery quality. Qualitative and subjective effects (sedation, analgesia, muscle relaxation) of the drugs were judged by observing physical response of the animal to surgical stimulation during herniorrhaphy. Numerical values starting from 0 to 3 (0-no effect, 1-mild effect, 2-moderate effect, 3-deep effect) were used for scoring sedation, analgesia and muscle relaxation during maintenance of anaesthesia. For behavioral observations, body reflexes in relation to time were recorded. Physiological parameters like rectal temperature along with ambient temperature, heart rate and respiratory rate were also recorded at each designated interval. The statistical analysis of data was done by one-way-analysis of variance and Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT).
The animals included in the study were off feed, mostly having recurrent tympany, poor body condition, scanty to no faecal output since many days and few had regurgitation. During surgery severe adhesions were present between reticulum, diaphragm, thoracic cavity and adjoining viscera posing severe threat to life. The average duration of illness, body weight of animals and the quality of anaesthesia during herniorrhaphy are presented in Table 1 and the behavioral parameters are in Table 2.
 

Table 1: Mean ± S.E. of score of quality of anaesthesia of buffaloes maintained on isoflurane/sevoflurane.


 

Table 2: Onset time (Mean ± S.E.) in minute of behavioral characteristics of anaesthesia in buffaloes.


        
Preanaesthetic drugs were administered to minimize pain, remove apprehension, facilitate handling of animal,  and to minimize undesirable sympathetic and parasym- pathetic reflex activity. Glycopyrrolate stimulates cardiac reflex and blocks vagus reflex. It has a powerful and prolonged antisialogogue activity than atropine and has fewer tendencies for unwanted CNS side effects than atropine (Proakis and Harris, 1978). Administration of glycopyrrolate before xylazine, reduces salivation and maintains heart rate near normal in compromised animals. Xylazine provides sedation or, in higher doses, restraint (recumbency and light planes of general anaesthesia) in cattle (Carroll and Hartsfield, 1996). Butorphanol in combination with xylazine reduces the dose and duration of sedation than xylazine alone (Lin and Riddell, 2003). A synergism between alpha2-agonist and opioid analgesic has also been reported in goats (Carroll et al., 1998).
        
Analgesia and sedation scores were significantly high in group PI than in PS (Table 1). Elcock and Sweeny (2002) also reported lower analgesia in human for knee artheroscopy maintained on sevoflurane after propofol-fentanyl anesthesia than on isoflurane. However, the propofol-sevoflurane combination has also been used in cats (Selmi et al., 2005), dogs (Luis et al., 2009) and goats (Setoyama et al., 2003) but without any report of poor analgesia. Induction scores in both the groups were high as propofol is an ultrashort acting anaesthetic agent which has high serum protein binding (Dawidowicz et al., 2006). The lower dose of propofol (@1.3 mg/kg) was sufficient for induction and intubation in buffaloes due to synergism of premedicants, butorphanol with xylazine, as reported in goats (Carroll et al., 1998).The maintenance score and muscle relaxation were similar in both the groups.  The lower blood gas partition coefficients of isoflurane (1.46) and sevoflurane (0.68) helped in maintaining adequate plane of surgical anaesthesia rapidly by adjusting the concentration. Cardiopulmonary functions were well preserved in all the animals maintained on either isoflurane or sevoflurane. Singh et al., (2013) and Bodh et al., (2015) also reported isoflurane to be suitable agent for maintenance of general anaesthesia in buffaloes. Sevoflurane has been used in cattle (Seller et al., 2013) and goats (Setoyama et al., 2003) satisfactorily. It produces dose dependent CNS, cardiovascular and respiratory depressant effects that generally parallel those of isoflurane (Patel and Goa, 1996). Recovery scores were excellent in both the groups as it was rapid, smooth and excitement free. Rapid redistribution of propofol from brain to other tissues and low solubility of isoflurane and sevoflurane were responsible for quick recovery, once discontinued (Read et al., 2002; Seller et al., 2013). In all the animals after glycopyrrolate administration muzzle and nostrils became dry and after xylazine spontaneous activity decreased. Drooping of eyelids and loss of palpebral reflex occurred soon after intravenous administration of propofol. Corneal reflex was intact but sluggish. Intubation was performed after loss of swallowing reflexes and relaxation of jaw. For maintenance in PI group initially vaporizer was set at 3.5% and after 5 minutes maintained at 1.5%-2.5% during the herniorrhaphy,  however, in PS group it was 5% followed by 2.5% to 3.5% during maintenance as sevoflurane has higher minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) than isoflurane in different animals (Aida et al., 1996; Hikasa et al., 2000). With placement of the last skin suture vaporizer was shut off and only oxygen was given till regain of swallowing reflex.
        
Initiation of recovery was manifested by regain of alar, corneal and palpebral reflexes, opening of eyelids and movement of ears. Extubation time in group PS was significantly lower than group PI (Table 2). The times for regain of muscle tone, head rightening reflex and returning to sternal recumbency were similar in both the groups, however, the times taken for standing with ataxia and for complete recovery were significantly less in buffaloes that were maintained on sevoflurane than on isoflurane. Previous studies also reported the duration from recovery to standing to be shorter with sevoflurane than with isoflurane in dogs (Kazama and Ikeda, 1988; Mutoh et al., 1997; Johnson et al., 1998).
        
A significant decrease in rectal temperature was recorded in both the groups. It might be attributed to decrease in the skeletal muscle tone, reduced metabolic rate, muscle relaxation, along with depression of thermoregulatory center and vasodilatation. The ambient temperatures between the two groups varied significantly but the patterns of observations within the group were similar. The effect of ambient temperature is evident in buffaloes of both groups on heart and respiration rate during pre and post anaesthetic period (Table 3). Heart rate increased significantly in both the groups at 15 min of glycopyrrolate as it stimulates cardiac reflex and blocks vagus reflex. Khan et al., (2007) also reported similar findings in buffaloes. The respiratory rate decreased more in groups maintained on isoflurane than on sevoflurane. Ebert et al., (1995) also found sevoflurane to offer a more stable cardiorespiratory profile in horses. Premedication with xylazine and butorphanol might also be associated with respiratory depression (Stoelting, 2011). Sevoflurane and isoflurane have been reported to cause dose dependent decrease in respiratory rate, blood pressure, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance and an increase in PETCO2 when maintained at one MAC in humans, dogs, horses, sheep and goats (Aida et al., 1996; Mutoh et al., 1997; Johnson et al., 1998; Hikasa et al., 2000; Galloway et al., 2004).
 

Table 3: Effects of different anaesthetic combinations on Mean ± S.E. of different physiological parameters of buffaloes.


        
Hb, PCV and TLC decreased (Table 4) in both the groups during the anaesthetic period which might be due to pooling of circulating blood cells in the spleen or other reservoirs secondary to sympathetic activity (Gasthuys et al., 1987). Neutrophilia and lymphocytopenia in both the groups could be as a result of surgical trauma and stimulation of adrenal glands (Desborough, 2000).
 

Table 4: Effects of different anaesthetic combinations on Mean±S.E. of haematological parameters in buffaloes.


        
Significant increase in plasma glucose levels (Table 5) was observed in both the groups which might be due to increased sympathetic stimulation and insulin inhibitory effect of xylazine and increased gluconeogenesis (Nunez et al., 2004). Injury of muscles by foreign bodies, during rumenotomy and herniorrhaphy as well as restraining for surgery might be the cause of rise in LDH level. There was slight rise in the triglycerides level at five minutes of propofol administration. No significant changes in the AST, ALT, GGT levels were observed between the groups. Total plasma proteins (TP) and A:G ratio revealed a significant decrease (P<0.05) during the period of anaesthesia (from premedication to recovery) in both the groups. The plasma urea and creatinine levels were raised at premedication to 24 hours of recovery than the pre-operative values in both  the groups as animals had no access to oral intake leading to poor state of hydration and compromised haemodynamics (Steffy et al., 1979). There was very little chance of compound A (pentafluoro-isopropenyl fluoromethyl ether) formation as the flow rate of oxygen was high and the circuit was partially open during the entire period of anaesthesia. The decrease in TP and A:G ratio in both groups might be attributed to expanded intravascular volume due to fluid therapy, shifting of fluid from extravascular compartment to intravascular compartment to maintain normal cardiac output (Brock, 1994) and the protein degradation caused by surgical stress and trauma.
 

Table 5: Effect of different anaesthetic combinations on Mean ± S.E. of different biochemical parameters of buffaloes.

  
 
Buffaloes of both the groups were deficient in plasma electrolytes (Na, K, Cl, Ca) preoperatively which improved post-operatively towards normal level without any significant difference (Table 4). These buffaloes were anorectic for many days and had reduced water intake. Also, all had inflammatory adhesions of reticulum with adjacent organs of abdominal cavity which adversely affected the rumeno-reticular motility and outflow of ingesta. Therefore, changes in the plasma concentration of electrolytes in such animals were expected (Behl et al., 1997). Fluid therapy during treatment, provision of common salt in drinking water and initiation of food intake after surgery caused increase in plasma concentration of these electrolytes.
Sevoflurane and isoflurane were clinically effective as well as a safe maintenance agent in balanced anaesthetic combination with glycopyrrolate-xylazine-butorphanol-Propofol in buffaloes undergoing diaphragmatic herniorr- haphy. The recovery form anaesthesia was faster and cardio-respiratory depression was lesser with sevoflurane than  isoflurane in buffaloes.

  1. Aida, H., Mizuno, Y., Hobo, S., Yoshida, K. andFujinaga, T. (1996). Cardiovascular and pulmonary effects of Sevoflurane anaesthesia in horses. Vet Anesth., 25: 164-170. 

  2. Behl, S.M., Singh, J. and Krishnamurthy, D. (1997) Functional stomach disorder (Vagus indigestion) in buffaloes, Aclinical investigation. Indian J Vet Surg., 18: 73-79.

  3. Bodh, D., Singh, K., Mohindroo, J., Gopinathan, A., Mahajan, S.K. and Saini, N.S. (2015). Evaluation of midazolam and midazolam-butorphanolpremedications for general anaesthesia in buffaloes. Indian J Vet Surg., 36(2):77-81.

  4. Brock, N. (1994). Acepromazine revisited. Canadian Vet J., 35: 458-459.

  5. Cagnardi, P., Zonca, A., Gallo, M., Pravettoni, D., Morandi, N., Villa, R. and Carli, S. (2009). 

  6. Pharmacokinetics of propofol in calves undergoing abdominal surgery. Vet. Res. Commun., 33(1): 177–179.

  7. Carroll, G.L. and Hartsfield, S.M. (1996). General anaesthetic techniques in ruminants. Vet Clin N Am -Food A., 12: 627-661.

  8. Carroll, G.L., Hooper, R.N., Slater, M.R., Hartsfield,S.M.and Matthews, N.S. (1998). Detomidine-butorphanol-propofol for carotid artery translocation and castration and ovariectomy in goats. Vet Surg., 27: 75-82.

  9. Dawidowicz, A.L., Kalitynszi, R., Kobielski, M. andPieniadz, J. (2006). Influence of propofol concentration in human plasma on free fraction of the drug. Chem-BiolInteract., 159: 149–155.

  10. Desborough, J.P. (2000). The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth., 85:109-17.

  11. Ebert, T.J., Harkin, C.P. and Muzi, M. (1995). Cardiovascular responses to sevoflurane, a review. Anesth Analg., 81(6 suppl.): S11-22.

  12. Elcock, D.H. and Sweeny, B.P. (2002). Sevoflurane vs. isoflurane: a clinical comparison in day surgery. Anaesthesia, 57:52-56.

  13. Galloway, D.S., Ko, J.C.H., Reaugh, H.H., Mandsagar, R.E. and Payton, M.E. (2004) Anaesthetic indices of Sevoflurane and isoflurane in unpremedicated dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc., 225: 700-704

  14. Gasthuys, F., Terpstra, P., Hende, C.V. and Demoor, A.( 1987) Hyperglycemia and diuresis during sedation with detomidine in horse. J Am Vet Med Assoc., 34: 641.

  15. Hall, L.W. and Peshin, P.K.( 1996). Propofol-halothane-nitrous oxide/oxygen anaesthesia for mega-voltage radiotherapy in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg., 23: 20-22.

  16. Hikasa, Y., Saito, K., Takase, K. and Ogasawara, S. (2000). Clinical, cardiopulmonary, haematological and serum biochemical effects of Sevoflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia in osxygen under spontaneous breathing sheep. Small Ruminant Res.36: 241-249. PMID:10781740.

  17. Johnson, R.A., Striler, E., Swayer, D.C. and Brunson, D.B. (1998). Comparison of isoflurane with Sevoflurane for anesthesia induction and recovery in adult dogs. Am J Vet Res., 59: 478-481. PMID: 9563634.

  18. Kazama, T. and Ikeda, K.( 1988). Comparison of MAC and the rate of rise of alveolar concentration of sevoflurane with halothane and isoflurane in the dog. Anesth., 68: 435-437.

  19. Khan, I., Kumar, A., Singh, J., Peshin, P.K. and Singh S. (2007). Evaluation of glycopyrrolate as an anticholinergic in buffalo calves (Bubalusbubalis). Ital J Anim Sci., 6(2): 1007-1010.

  20. Krishnamurthy, D. and Nigam, J.M. and Deshpande, K.S. (1985) Surgical techniques and management. In:Monograph on diaphragmatic herniain bovines (eds. Krishnamurthy, D., Nigam. J.M., Peshin, P.K., Sharma, D.N. and Tyagi, R.P.S.) pp.115, Published by Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (India).

  21. Lin, H.C. and Riddell, M.G. (2003). Preliminary study of effect of xylazine or detomidine with or without butorphanol for standing sedation in dairy cattle. Vet ther., 4(3): 285-291.

  22. Luis, A.L., Hofmeister, E.H., Pavez. J.C. andBrainard, B.M. (2009).Comparision of recovery from anaesthesia with isoflurane, Sevoflurane, or desflurane in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res., 70(11): 1339-44.

  23. Mutoh, T., Nishimura, R., Kim, H.Y., Matsunaga, S. and Sasaki, N. (1997). Cardiopulmonary effects of sevoflurane, compared with halothane, enflurane and isoflurane in dogs. Am J Vet Res., 58: 885-890. PMID: 9256976.

  24. Nunez, E., Steffy, E.P. and Ocampo, L. (2004). Effects of á2 adrenergic receptor agonists on urine production in horses deprived of food and water. Am J Vet Res., 65: 1342-1346.

  25. Patel, S.S. and Goa, K.L. (1996). Sevoflurane-A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its clinical use in general anaesthesia. Drugs, 52(2): 658-700.

  26. Peshin, P.K., Krishnamurthy, D., Singh, K., Nassimi, M.N.and Nigam, J.M. (1987). Haemodynamics and blood gas changes in buffaloes (Bubalusbubalis) in the supine position following thiopentoneanaesthesia with premedication. Vet Res Commun., 11: 1-4. 

  27. Potliya, S., Kumar, A., Kumar, S., Singh, S. and Kumar, S. (2015). Evaluation of efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate- xylazine - propofol anesthesia in buffalo calves. Veterinary World, 8(3): 251-256.

  28. Proakis, A.G. and Harris, G.B. (1978). Comparative penetration of glycopyrrolate and atropine across the blood- brain and placental barriers in anaesthetized dogs. Anesth, 48: 339-344.

  29. Read, M.R., Read, E.K., Duke, T. and Wilson, D.G. (2002). Cardiopulmonary effects and induction and recovery charecteristics of isoflurane and Sevoflurane in foals. J Am Vet Med Assoc., 217: 1025-28.

  30. Seller, G., Lin Hui-Chu, Chamorro, M. F. andWalz, P.H. (2013).Comparision of isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia in Holstein calves for placement of portal and jugular vein canula. Am J Anim Vet Sci., 8(1): 1-7.

  31. Selmi, A.L., Mendes, G.M., Lins, B.T., Figueirede, J.P. andBarbudeSelmi, G.R. (2005). Comparison of xylazine and metomidine as premedicants for cats being anaesthesised with propofol-sevoflurane. Vet Rec., 157(5): 139-43.

  32. Setoyama, K., Shinzato, T., Misumi, K., Fujiki, M. andSakamto, H. (2003). Effect of propofol-sevoflurane on maternal and f etal hemodynamics blood gases and uterine activity in pregnant goats. J Vet Medl Sci., 65(10): 1075-81.

  33. Singh, G.D., Kinjavedkar, P., Amarpal, Aithal, H.P., Pawde, A.M., Zama, M.M.S., Singh J and Tiwary, R. (2013). Clinicophysiological and haemodynamic effects of fentanyl with xylazine, medetomidine and dexmedetomidine in isoflurane anaesthetized water buffaloes (Bubalusbubalis). Journal of South African Veterinary Association. 84(1): Art. #67, 11 pages. http// dx.doi.org /10.4102 /jsava.v 84i 1.67.

  34. Steffy, E.P., Zinkl, J. and Howland, D.J. (1979). Minimal changes in blood cell counts and biochemical values associated with prolonged isoflurane anaesthesia of horses. Am J Vet Res. 40: 1646-1648.

  35. Steffy, E.P., Mama, K.R. and Brasnon, R.J. (2015). Inhalation anesthetics. In: Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia-The fifth edition of Lumb and Jones (eds. Grimm K A, Lamont LA, Tranquilli WJ, Greene SA and Robertson SA) Wiley Balckwell. P 310,

  36. Stoelting, R.K. (2011). Inhaled anaesthetics. In: Pharmacological and Physiological Basis of Anaesthesia Practice. [(Precy RC,editor)] Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia; pp.36-76. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)