Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Indian Journal of
Animal Research
Print ISSN: 0367-6722
Online ISSN: 0976-0555
NASS Rating
6.40
SJR
0.233
CiteScore
0.606

Chief Editor:
M. R. Saseendranath
Kerala Veterinary and Animal Science University, Mannuthy, Thrissur, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, ...

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 48 issue 4 (august 2014) : 362-365

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTS ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCE, NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY AND PLASMA METABOLIC PROFILE OF LABRADOR PUPS

Nitin Tyagi*, C.S. Ahuja, J.S. Lamba, Mudit Chandra, S.S. Sikka
1Department of Animal Nutrition Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana. 141 001, India
Cite article:- Tyagi* Nitin, Ahuja C.S., Lamba J.S., Chandra Mudit, Sikka S.S. (2025). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTS ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCE, NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY AND PLASMA METABOLIC PROFILE OF LABRADOR PUPS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 48(4): 362-365. doi: 10.5958/0976–0555.2014.00456.7.

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted to compare the effect of Lactic acid Bacillus and Yeast on the growth performance of Labrador pups. Twelve Labrador pups (3.5 months age, around 9.7 kg B.Wt) was assigned three dietary treatments of control diet T1 (Balanced Homemade diet), T2 (Control diet + Lactic acid bacillus) and T3 (Control diet + Yeast). The duration of experiment was 90 days. A digestibility trial was conducted at the mid of experiment. The results of digestibility studies revealed no significant difference on the digestibility of DM, OM, CP, CF, EE, NFE and NDF among treatment groups. The body weight gain was also statistically same in all the groups. All the blood parameters were within physiological limits and did not differ significantly except Total Protein level at 60 day in T2. The results conclusively indicated no significant effect of supplementing lactic acid bacteria and yeast on growth performance of pups under present experimental conditions.

REFERENCES

  1. AAFCO. (1994) Pet food regulations. Association of American feed control officials, AAFCO official publication, Atlanta,         USA, pp. 87-108
  2. AOAC, (2000) Official Analytical Methods. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  3. Barrows, G.T. and  Deam, B .D. (1985) Using probiotics in small animals: a new approach. Vet. Med. 1: 36–42.
  4. Chaudhary L.C., Singh R., Kamra D.N and Pathak N.N (1995) Effect of oral administration of yeast (Saccharomyces         cerevisiae) on digestibility and growth performance of rabbits fed diets of different fibre content. World Rabbit         Sci 3(1), 15-18
  5. Cruickshank R (1965) Medical Microbiology, A Guide to the Laboratory Diagnosis and Control of Infection. 11th edition,         pub KAR Liningstome limited, Edinburgh and London pp870.
  6. Fuller R. (1989) A review : Probiotics in man and animals. Applied Bacteriol 66: 365-78
  7. Karma D.N., Chaudhary L.C., Singh R., and Pathak N.N (1996) Influence of feeding probiotics on the growth performance         and digestibility in rabbits. World Rabbit Sci 4 (2) 85-88
  8. Katoch S., Kaistha M., Sharma K.S. and Katoch B.S (2011) Effect of supplementing combination of direct fed microbial         isolated from vegetable sources on biological performance of different strains of broiler chicken. Indian J.Anim.         Sci 81: 62-67
  9. Nawaz H.,Naseem M.A., Yaqoob M.,Ahmad F. and Yousaf M (2008) Effect of dry yeast (Saccaromysec cerevisiae) on         the live performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Indian J.Anim. Sci 78: 120-123
  10. Ng.S.C, Hart A.L, Kamm, M.A, Stagg A.J and Knight S.C (2009) Mechanism of action of probiotics: Recent Advances.         Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 15 : 300-310
  11. Parker R. B. (1974) Probiotics, the other half of the antibiotic story. Anim. Nutr. Health 29:4–8.
  12. VanSoest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. (1991) J. Dairy Sci. 74: 3583-3597
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)