BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF FAT BODIES OF THE POPULAR SILKWORM BREEDS / HYBRIDS AND FOUNDATION CROSSES

DOI: 10.5958/j.0976-0555.48.2.029    | Article Id: B-2347 | Page : 134-138
Citation :- BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF FAT BODIES OF THE POPULAR SILKWORM BREEDS / HYBRIDS AND FOUNDATION CROSSES.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2014.(48):134-138
A. Naseema Begum, B. Rakesh1, P. Sudhakara Rao* and M. Mamatha parimi_rao@yahoo.com
Address : Central Sericultural Research and Training Instiute, Srirampura, Mysore-570 008, India

Abstract

The changes in the chemical composition of fat body reflect tissue specific changes in different developmental stages of the silkworm pupae.  The data on the difference in the protein content of the fat body among the parents and single hybrid and foundation crosses revealed variations in protein content. In case of the total protein estimation, when males and females are being compared the females always exhibited higher protein content than males. The data of the difference in the carbohydrate content in the fat body among the males of single hybrid, foundation cross and that of the parents revealed that the concentration of glycogen in the fat body was higher in case of parents than that of hybrids and observed to be more in the females. Statistical analysis has shown significant results among the parents, FC and the hybrids for carbohydrate content in fat bodies. Accordingly, no major differences were noticed in the total lipid content between the breeds was observed even though small quantity of increase in lipid content was exhibited by the females. Since silkworm pupae mainly consisted of tricyclglycenol, phosphatidylethanolamine, and phosphati-dylcholine. Both of them contains approximately 40% of a-linolenic acid as the predominant fatty acid, silkworm pupae would be a good source of functional fatty acids in the diet.

Keywords

Carbohydrates Fat bodies Lipids Protein Silkworm Bombyx mori (L).

References

  1. Anonymous (2010) Annual report of Central Silk Board, Bangalore (2009-2010).
  2. Datta, R. K (1992) Guidelines for bivoltine silkworm rearing. Central Silk Board, Bangalore.
  3. Datta., R. K.; Basavaraja, H. K.; Mal Reddy, N; Kishore Kumar, C.M.; Nirmal Kumar, S.; Ahsan, M.M.; Suresh Kumar, N.and Ramesh Babu, M.(2000) Evolution of new productive bivoltine hybrids CSR2×CSR and CSR2×CSR5 Sericoligia., 40(1):151-167.
  4. Dubois, M., Gilles,K.A., Hamilton,J.K.,Rebers,P.A. and Smith, F. (1956) Colorimetric method of determination of sugars and related substances.Ana.chem..28:350-356.
  5. Eiichi kotake-Nara, Kanako Yamamoto, Mitsuyoshi Nozawa, Kazuo Miyashita and Tsuyoshi Murakami (2002). Lipid profiles and oxidative stability of silkworm pupal oil. Journal of Oleo science, 51 (11), 681-690.
  6. Folch,I.; Ascoli, L.; Less, M.; Meath, J. A. and le baron, f.n.(1951) Preparation of lipids extracts from brain tissue. J. Biol Chem.., 191:833-841.
  7. Huijuan Yang, Zhonghua Zhou, Huarong Zhang, Ming Chen, Jianying Li, Yingying Ma and Boxiong Zhong (2009). Shotgun proteomic analysis of the fat body during metamorphosis of domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori). The journal of Amino acids, ISSN 1438-2199 (Online).
  8. Lowry, O.H, Rosebrough N, Farr A and Randall. R (1951). Protein measurement with Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 193: 265-275.
  9. Mario A, D’Costa and Birt LM (1966). Changes in the lipid content during the metamorphosis of the blowfly, Lucilia. Journal of Insect Physiology; 12 (11), 1377-1394.
  10. Nagata, M and Masahiko Kobayashi (1990). Quantitative changes in the Storage protein during the larval development of the Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Journal of Sericultural science, Japan, 59(6), 461 -468.
  11. Nirmal Kumar, S.; Mal Reddy, N.; Basavaraja, H.K.; Ramesh Babu, M.; Suresh Kumar, N.; Ahsan, M.M. and Datta, R. K. (1999) Identification of bivoltine double hybrids for commercial exploitation. Indian J. Seric. 38: 135-139.
  12. Wright, James E; Rushing, Darcy D.(1973).Glycogen in Pupal and Adult Stable Flies as Affected by a Juvenile Hormone Analogue”. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 66(2); 274-276(3).

Global Footprints