Animals fed with maize had a higher FBW than those fed with barley (Table 2); they also showed higher weight gain and CW. The feed conversion rate, the total and daily feed intake and the ADG were different (p < 0.05) for both types of grain. Apparent digestibility coefficients of the nutrients are reported in Table 3. The maize or barley diets had similar apparent digestibility; (dry matter; organic matter and acid detergent fiber); but maize diets have a higher neutral detergent fiber apparent digestibility (NDFAD), this change might explain the difference in the performance of the rabbits fed with maize. These results are different from those obtained by
Gidenne et al., (2005), who found no impacts of grain type on the dry matter or organic matter apparent digestibility values of 50-day-old rabbits, while in young rabbits, the maize diet reduced the DMAD and OMAD values compared with the barley diet, which is a result of the higher ileal starch concentration, related to the quantity of resistant starch present in maize. The same authors show that the extrusion of maize increases ileal starch digestion. In our work, the pelleting of the feed could have had a similar effect on the extrusion of maize starch, increasing the OMAD levels. Additionally, maize diets have a high NDFAD, resulting in a high hemicellulose concentration; this change in digestibility might explain the difference in the performance of the rabbits fed with maize. Generally, diets with a high quantity of fiber result in increased growth and ADG levels
(Gidenne et al., 2004; Bovera et al., 2012). In other studies, feed efficiency increased linearly (P < 0.001) with increasing NDSF inclusion
(Gómez-Conde et al., 2009).
Supplementation of both kinds of
S. cerevisiae increased (p < 0.05) the performance (FBW, TWG, CW and FCR) of the rabbits (Table 4). These results agree with
Falcão-e-Cunha et al. (2007), who found that probiotics supplementation improved growth performance characteristics.
Das et al., (2002) and
Bhatt et al. (2017) showed that in rabbits, the probiotics enhance ADG and FCR levels, with a decrease in mortality rate.
Ezema and Eze, (2012) recorded higher (p < 0.05) TWG levels for rabbits fed on bioactive yeast (probiotic) at 0.12 g yeast (
Saccharomyces cerevisiae)/kg of diet than for rabbits supplemented with either 0.08 or 0.16 g yeast/kg diet. According to
EFSA, (2012), there is a significant improvement in total body weight of rabbits fed diets supplemented with Actisaf SC47, along with an improved feed conversion ratio (p < 0.05) and reduced mortality (p < 0.05) when compared to untreated animals. The effect on the FCR is related to the increase in TWG and DWG, without altering the feed intake. The results of this experiment show that animals receiving probiotics have the same feed intake (p > 0.05) as control animals. The positive effect of
S. cerevisiae on animals can result from a direct nutritional effect; alternatively, they act as bioregulators of the intestinal microflora, enhancing the host’s natural defenses
(Jawhara et al., 2012). One of the most important results of this work is the change in CW; supplementation with
S. cerevisiae resulted in significant increases in CW (p < 0.05).
Ahmed et al., (2019) obtained a similar result with rabbits, using 4 g/kg of SC. In other species (ruminants), the inclusion of yeast in the diet resulted in differences in carcass quality and the proportion of “Premium Choice” carcasses increased with increasing levels of yeast in the diet
(Ovinge et al., 2018). According to
Elghandour et al. (2019) supplementation with
S. cerevisiae could have metabolic effects and results in immunomodulation, changes in intestinal microbiota and the removal of oxygen.
The supplementation of high levels of Procreatin®7 or Biosaf SC47 to the maize or barley diets increased the OMD, DMD, NDFD and ADFD (p < 0.05; Table 5). The desirable effects of yeast found here could be related to the higher level of yeast found in the caecum of supplemented animals. In contrast to the rumen, the caecum is a more strictly anaerobic compartment
(Kimsé et al., 2012). As a result, both kinds of
S. cerevisiae increased the DMAD, OMAD and NDFAD levels.
Ewuola et al., (2011) reported positive effects on DM, protein and crude fiber digestibility due to the administration of
S. cerevisiae (125,000 million cfu) and
Saccharomyces boulardii (30,000 million cfu). Additionally,
Ghazanfar et al. (2015) suggested significant effects (p < 0.05) on dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), as well as NDF and ADF digestibility. Our data support the findings of
Ghazanfar et al. (2015), who showed that NDF and ADF digestibility were improved in yeast-supplemented groups.
Chaucheyras-Durand et al. (2016) revealed the in vitro potential of probiotic yeasts to enhance the growth and activity of fiber-degrading rumen microorganisms.
Elghandour et al. (2019) showed that the addition of live yeast to animal rations can alter the digestion of dietary components. Similarly,
Onu and Oboke (2010) report that live yeast administration also improved dry matter digestibility, in addition to a considerable positive effect on ADF. Positive effects of S. cerevisiae on fungal zoospore germination and cellulose degradation have been reported by
Chaucheyras et al. (1995), who recently confirmed that yeasts can enhance fungal colonization of plant cell walls
(Chaucheyras-Durand et al., 2016). A stable cecal pH provides a suitable environment for microbial growth, as fungi and bacteria degrade cellulose. Consequently, these microbial species facilitate fiber digestion. In contrast,
Tripathi and Karim, (2010) reported no effect of yeast supplementation on nutrient digestibility. These variations in nutrient digestibility may be related to the quality and nature of the diet fed to animals, as described by
Elghandour et al. (2019).