BLOOD PROFILE OF JERSEY CROSSBRED COWS UNDER DIFFERENT PHYSIOLOGICAL STAGES·

Article Id: ARCC3443 | Page : 114 - 117
Citation :- BLOOD PROFILE OF JERSEY CROSSBRED COWS UNDER DIFFERENT PHYSIOLOGICAL STAGES·.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2002.(36):114 - 117
T. Sivaraman, S. Shanmugasundaram, S. Arunachalam and T. Sivakumar
Address : Department of Uvestcx:k Production and Management, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai - 600 097, India

Abstract

A study was conducted to find out the blood profile of 28 Jersey crossbred cows at different physiological stages. The physiological stages of the experimental cows such as dry stage, milking and lactating - pregnant conditions. Blood samples were collected once in a month for a period of twelve months and 16 important blood constituents were estimated. All the blood constituents with the exception of only total protein and serum magnesium had differed at highly significant (P<0.01) level between the three physiological stages.

Keywords

References

  1. Bergmeyer, H.U. (1986). J. Chem. Cfjn. Biochem.• 24: 497.
  2. Blowey, RW. (1985). In Bovine Medicine 1" Ed., (Andrews, A.H. et al ed.) BlackweU Scientific Publications, Oxford.
  3. Vol. 36, No.2, 2002
  4. Crist, WL. eta/. (1967). J. DairySci., 50: 138.
  5. Doumas, B.J. (1978). COn. Chem., 21: 1159.
  6. Ghislain, P. eta/. (1985). Can. Vet J., 26: 306-311.
  7. Gonzaga, A.C. and Vergara, J.S. (1956)./ndian Vet J., 33: 11-17.
  8. Kaplan, L.A. (1987). COn. Chem., pp: 22.
  9. Lennon, Jr. H.D. and Mixner, J.P. (1957). J. ~rySci., 40: 1424-1429.
  10. ,~orin, L.G. and Prox, J. (1973). cOn. Chem. Acta., 46: 113.
  11. Payne, J.M. eta/. (1973). British Vet. J., 129: 370-381.
  12. Payne, J.M. et aJ. (1974). British ~t. J., 130: 34-43. •
  13. Raabo, E. (1969). Scand. J. CUn. Lab. Invest., 12: 402.
  14. Rowlands, G.J. eta/. (1980). J. Agric. Sci. Cam., 94: 517-527.
  15. Schalm, DW. eta!. (1975). Veterinary Haematology. 3rd Ed., Philadelphia.
  16. Snedecor, G.W and Cochran, WG 0%7). Statistical Methods. 6t1l.Edn.,IBH, Oxford, Calcutta.
  17. Tainturier, D. (1984). Res. Vet. 5<:1.. 37: \29-131.
  18. Terri, A.E. and Sesin, P.G. (1958). Am. J. CUni. Path., 29: 86.
  19. Trinder, P. (1951). Anal. Chem., 76: 596.
  20. Wahbi, A.GA eta/. (1981). Werkl Rev. Anim. Prod" Vol. 17: 27-34.
  21. Wiebe, DA and Smith, S.J. (1985). COn. Chem. 3: 746.
  22. Zak, B.E. etal. (1975). Anals. CUni. Lab. Sci., 5:195-215.

Global Footprints