Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 36 issue 2 (july to december 2002) : 98 - 101

EFFECT OF ENRICHMENT OF ENVIRONMENT FOR BETTER ECONOMIC REPRODUCTNE PERFORMANCE OFSOWS·

V. Ramesh, P.C. SaseendranI

Affiliations

¹Department of Livestock Production and ~nagement, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai ~,OOO 007, India.

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Ramesh V., SaseendranI P.C. (2024). EFFECT OF ENRICHMENT OF ENVIRONMENT FOR BETTER ECONOMIC REPRODUCTNE PERFORMANCE OFSOWS·. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 36(2): 98 - 101. doi: .

ABSTRACT

An experiment was carried out to findout the effect of three types of housing systems viz., conventional house with wallowing tank (T1), conventional house with sprinklers (T2) and range system (T3) on the reproductive performance of sows. Eighteen sows were reared under each system. A significantly (P0.01) lower air temperature was observed in sprinkler (33°C) as compared to conventional (35°C) and range (34.35°C) system. In the sprinkler and range groups (T2 and T3) there were a higher weight gains i.e. 5.67 and 6.3 kg respectively. The increased litter weight of 20.75 kg in T2 group and 25.38kg in T3 group over T1 group at weaning produced it savings of Rs. 1556.25 and Rs. 1903.50 respectively. The pre-weaning piglet mortality was less in T2 and T3 groups which resulted in additional savings of Rs. 600 and Rs. 1200 respectively per litter. Although Rs. 139.20 and Rs. 3000 per animal was incurred on additional facilities in T2 and T3 group, still there was an average net saving of Rs. 2191.20 and 306.20 respectively per farrowing.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Costa, a.A.D. et al. (1995). Revista-da-Socideade-Brasileria-de-Zootechnia, 24: 952-61.
Hughes, P.E. and Cole, D.J.A. (1975). Anim. Prod., 21:183
Hughes, P.E. and Varely, M.A. (1980). Reproduction in the Pig. Butterworth and Co., London
Joseph, M. (1997). Ph.D. Thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur.
Snedecor, ·G.W and Cochran, WG. (1985). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Calcutta.
Spitschak, K. and Franke, W (1995). Neue-Landwirtschaft, 1: 57-60.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

EFFECT OF ENRICHMENT OF ENVIRONMENT FOR BETTER ECONOMIC REPRODUCTNE PERFORMANCE OFSOWS·

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board