volume 37 issue 2 (july to december 2003) : 147 -148

OOCYTE RECOVERY RATES IN RELATION TO MORPHOLOGY AND WEIGHT OF THE OVARIES IN BUFFALOES

P
P.S.P. Gupta
S
S. Nandi
H
H.M.Raghu
B
B.M.Ravindranatha
P
P.v. Sarma
1National Institute of Arlimal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore - 560 030, Karnataka, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gupta P.S.P., Nandi S., H.M.Raghu, B.M.Ravindranatha, Sarma P.v. (2025). OOCYTE RECOVERY RATES IN RELATION TO MORPHOLOGY AND WEIGHT OF THE OVARIES IN BUFFALOES. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 37(2): 147 -148. doi: .
Oocytes retrieved from abattoir derived buffalo ovaries were classified into three categories i.e. ovaries with corpus luteum (CL), ovaries without CL and pooled ovaries. Correlation coefficient was calculated between the ovarian weights and the oocyte recovery rates for all the three categories of ovaries. Ovarian weight of ovary with CL was significantly more than that of ovary without CL. There was a positive correlation between the ovarian weights and the oocyte recovery rates in all the three categories of ovaries.
    1. Boediono, A. et a/. (1995). TheJiogenology, 43: 169 (abstract).
    2. Danell, B. (1987). Ph. D. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala. Sweden.
    3. Das, G.K. (1996). Theriogenology, 46: 1403-1411.
    4. Dobriyal, A.K. eta/. (1987). UtterPradeshJ. Zoo., 7: 127-132.
    5. Gordon, I. and Lu, KH. (1990). Theriogenology, 33: 77 - 87.
    6. Hazelezer, N.L. et a/. (1995). Theriogenology, 43: 509 - 522.
    7. Jindal, S.K. et a/. (1997). Buffalo J., 13: 369-373.
    8. Moreno, J.E et a/. (1992). Bio. Reprod., 46 (Suppl. 1): 65 (abstract).
    9. Neugbaver, G. (1993). Ph. D. Thesis, Tierazthiche Hochschule. Hannover, Germany.
    10. Saumande, J. and Testart, J. (1974). Theriogenology, 2: 121-129.
    11. Snedecor, G.w. and Cochran, w.G. (1967). Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH publishing company, New Delhi, India.
    volume 37 issue 2 (july to december 2003) : 147 -148

    OOCYTE RECOVERY RATES IN RELATION TO MORPHOLOGY AND WEIGHT OF THE OVARIES IN BUFFALOES

    P
    P.S.P. Gupta
    S
    S. Nandi
    H
    H.M.Raghu
    B
    B.M.Ravindranatha
    P
    P.v. Sarma
    1National Institute of Arlimal Nutrition and Physiology, Bangalore - 560 030, Karnataka, India
    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Gupta P.S.P., Nandi S., H.M.Raghu, B.M.Ravindranatha, Sarma P.v. (2025). OOCYTE RECOVERY RATES IN RELATION TO MORPHOLOGY AND WEIGHT OF THE OVARIES IN BUFFALOES. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 37(2): 147 -148. doi: .
    Oocytes retrieved from abattoir derived buffalo ovaries were classified into three categories i.e. ovaries with corpus luteum (CL), ovaries without CL and pooled ovaries. Correlation coefficient was calculated between the ovarian weights and the oocyte recovery rates for all the three categories of ovaries. Ovarian weight of ovary with CL was significantly more than that of ovary without CL. There was a positive correlation between the ovarian weights and the oocyte recovery rates in all the three categories of ovaries.
      1. Boediono, A. et a/. (1995). TheJiogenology, 43: 169 (abstract).
      2. Danell, B. (1987). Ph. D. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Uppsala. Sweden.
      3. Das, G.K. (1996). Theriogenology, 46: 1403-1411.
      4. Dobriyal, A.K. eta/. (1987). UtterPradeshJ. Zoo., 7: 127-132.
      5. Gordon, I. and Lu, KH. (1990). Theriogenology, 33: 77 - 87.
      6. Hazelezer, N.L. et a/. (1995). Theriogenology, 43: 509 - 522.
      7. Jindal, S.K. et a/. (1997). Buffalo J., 13: 369-373.
      8. Moreno, J.E et a/. (1992). Bio. Reprod., 46 (Suppl. 1): 65 (abstract).
      9. Neugbaver, G. (1993). Ph. D. Thesis, Tierazthiche Hochschule. Hannover, Germany.
      10. Saumande, J. and Testart, J. (1974). Theriogenology, 2: 121-129.
      11. Snedecor, G.w. and Cochran, w.G. (1967). Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH publishing company, New Delhi, India.
      In this Article
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)