Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 37 issue 2 (july to december 2003) : 113 - 115

COMPARATIVE ANATOMY OF THE LARYNGEAL CARTILAGES IN MITHUN (BOS FRONTALIS} AND ZEBU (BOS INDICUS,

H
H.C. ~1ita
P
P.C. Kalita
A
A.K. Ghosh-
1Department of Anatomy and Histology, CoUege of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram - 796 007, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- ~1ita H.C., Kalita P.C., Ghosh- A.K. (2025). COMPARATIVE ANATOMY OF THE LARYNGEAL CARTILAGES IN MITHUN (BOS FRONTALIS} AND ZEBU (BOS INDICUS,. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 37(2): 113 - 115. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Present studies had been conducted to elucidate the gross structural peculiarities on various laryngeal cartilages of mithun and zebu. The larynx of mithun was relatively elongated than the zebu. The vocal fold, voealis muscles, thyroid cartilage and caudal cornua were well developed in mithun. The arytenoid cartilage was more thicker in mithun. The caudal thyroid notch was less distinct in mithun. The lingual surface of epiglottis of mithun was wider and curved cranio-ventrally. The median crest of cricoid cartilage of mithun was well developed, while its muscular process was less developed than that of zebu. The ventral laryngeal prominence of thyroid cartilage was shallow in both mithun and zebu. The corniculate process was comma shaped in zebu and it was less curved in mithun.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Fath E L- Bab, M.R. (1970). M.v.Sc Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assint University. Egypt.
    2. Ghoshal, N.G. and Patel, M.R. (1959). J Vet. Res., 2: 27-30.
    3. Grossman. J.D. (1959). Indian COlin. Agri. Res. New Delhi.
    4. Hare, W.C.D. (1975). Respiratory system. In: The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals, (Sisson and Grossman) 5'h Edn W B Saunders Co., Philadelphia. p 916.
    5. Nagpal, S.K. etal (1988). /ndianJ Anim. Sci., 58: 535-38.
    6. Nickel, R. et al. (1979). The Viscera of the Domestic Mammals. 2nd Edn. Verlay Paul Parey, Berlin.
    7. Saber, A.S. (1983). Anal. Histo. Embryo., 12: 77-84.
    8. Singh, I. and Sharma, D.N. (1992)./ndianJ Anim. Sci., 62: 549·50.
    9. Singh, I. and Sharma, D.N. (1992)./ndianJ Anim. Sci., 62: 642-43.
    10. Venkatakrishnan, A. and Sheshadri, V.K. (1986). Cheiron., 15(2): 44-48
    Published In
    Indian Journal of Animal Research
    Article Metrics
    Metrics Icon
    0
    Views
    0
    Citations
    Reviewed By
    Share Article
    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      volume 37 issue 2 (july to december 2003) : 113 - 115

      COMPARATIVE ANATOMY OF THE LARYNGEAL CARTILAGES IN MITHUN (BOS FRONTALIS} AND ZEBU (BOS INDICUS,

      H
      H.C. ~1ita
      P
      P.C. Kalita
      A
      A.K. Ghosh-
      1Department of Anatomy and Histology, CoUege of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram - 796 007, India

      • Submitted|

      • First Online |

      • doi

      Cite article:- ~1ita H.C., Kalita P.C., Ghosh- A.K. (2025). COMPARATIVE ANATOMY OF THE LARYNGEAL CARTILAGES IN MITHUN (BOS FRONTALIS} AND ZEBU (BOS INDICUS,. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 37(2): 113 - 115. doi: .

      ABSTRACT

      Present studies had been conducted to elucidate the gross structural peculiarities on various laryngeal cartilages of mithun and zebu. The larynx of mithun was relatively elongated than the zebu. The vocal fold, voealis muscles, thyroid cartilage and caudal cornua were well developed in mithun. The arytenoid cartilage was more thicker in mithun. The caudal thyroid notch was less distinct in mithun. The lingual surface of epiglottis of mithun was wider and curved cranio-ventrally. The median crest of cricoid cartilage of mithun was well developed, while its muscular process was less developed than that of zebu. The ventral laryngeal prominence of thyroid cartilage was shallow in both mithun and zebu. The corniculate process was comma shaped in zebu and it was less curved in mithun.

      KEYWORDS

        REFERENCES

        1. Fath E L- Bab, M.R. (1970). M.v.Sc Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Assint University. Egypt.
        2. Ghoshal, N.G. and Patel, M.R. (1959). J Vet. Res., 2: 27-30.
        3. Grossman. J.D. (1959). Indian COlin. Agri. Res. New Delhi.
        4. Hare, W.C.D. (1975). Respiratory system. In: The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals, (Sisson and Grossman) 5'h Edn W B Saunders Co., Philadelphia. p 916.
        5. Nagpal, S.K. etal (1988). /ndianJ Anim. Sci., 58: 535-38.
        6. Nickel, R. et al. (1979). The Viscera of the Domestic Mammals. 2nd Edn. Verlay Paul Parey, Berlin.
        7. Saber, A.S. (1983). Anal. Histo. Embryo., 12: 77-84.
        8. Singh, I. and Sharma, D.N. (1992)./ndianJ Anim. Sci., 62: 549·50.
        9. Singh, I. and Sharma, D.N. (1992)./ndianJ Anim. Sci., 62: 642-43.
        10. Venkatakrishnan, A. and Sheshadri, V.K. (1986). Cheiron., 15(2): 44-48
        In this Article
          Contact us
          Follow us
          Published In
          Indian Journal of Animal Research

          Editorial Board

          View all (0)