Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 37 issue 2 (july to december 2003) : 85 - 88

COMPARISON OF FIDELITY OF NUCLEIC ACID PROBE WITH CONVENTIONAL ANTIGEN DETECTION ASSAYS IN DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS

M. Parthiban, S. Manoharan, T.V. Meenambigai, N. Daniel Joy Chandran

Affiliations

¹Vaccine Research Centre (Viral Vaccines) Centre for Animal Health Studies, Madhavaram Milk Colony, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai - 600 051, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Parthiban M., Manoharan S., Meenambigai T.V., Chandran Joy Daniel N. (2024). COMPARISON OF FIDELITY OF NUCLEIC ACID PROBE WITH CONVENTIONAL ANTIGEN DETECTION ASSAYS IN DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 37(2): 85 - 88. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The efficiency of PCR generated probe coupled with enhanced chemiluminescent hybridization assay was compared with conventional antigen detection assays to detect the IBD virus infection in chicks in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The hybridization assay was found to be superior to conventional antigen detection assays in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Akin, A. et a!' (1993). J Vet Diag. Invest., 5: 166-73.
Chomczynski, P. and Sacchi, N. (1987). Ana!' Biochem., 162: 156-59.
Davis, S.v. and Boyle, J.A. (1990). Avian Dis., 34: 329-335.
Hirai, K eta!. (1972). Avian Dis., 16: 961-964.
Henderson, KS. and Jackwood, D.J. (1990). Avian Dis., 34: 744-748.
·Jackwood. D.J. et ai. (1982). Avian Dis., 26: 871-882.
,Jackwood, D.J et ai. (1989). C/in. Microbio!., 27: 2437-2443.
Jackwood, D.J. etai. (1992). Avian Dis., 36: 154-157.
Maiti, N.K. etal. (1980). Comp.immunoi. Microbio!.lnfect. Dis., 16: 245-250.
Marquarat, W. et a!' (1980). Avian Dis., 24: 375-385.
Nachimuthu, 1,. eta!. (1993.lnd. J Anim. Sci., 63: 817-819.
Parthiban. M. et a!' (2000)./nd. J Anim. Sci., 70: 265-266,
Stram, Y. et ai. (1994). Avian Dis., 38: 879-884.
Wu, c.c. et a!' (1992). Avian Dis., 36: 221-226.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

COMPARISON OF FIDELITY OF NUCLEIC ACID PROBE WITH CONVENTIONAL ANTIGEN DETECTION ASSAYS IN DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board