GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF THREE-BREED CROSSES OF HOLSTEIN FRIESIAN, BROWN SWISS AND HARIANA CATTLE

Article Id: ARCC3221 | Page : 244-249
Citation :- GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF THREE-BREED CROSSES OF HOLSTEIN FRIESIAN, BROWN SWISS AND HARIANA CATTLE.Indian Journal Of Animal Research.2007.(41):244-249
S. Bindu Madhuri , C.L. Suman and H.S. Pandey
Address : Livestock Production Management Section Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243122 (India)

Abstract

The growth performance of three-breed crosses of Holstein Friesian, Brown Swiss and Hariana
breeds of cattle (FBH) maintained at Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar from 1976 to
1996 was studied. The overall mean body weight increased from 26.50 ± 0.35 kg at birth to 306.33 ± 3.19 kg at 24 months of age. Their average body weights at first fertile service and first calving were 268.50 ± 2.60 kg and 305.64 ± 2.84 kg, respectively. The mean body weight at birth of parent crosses was significantly (p g periods was significant (phs of age indicated the effects of differential managemental practices on the growth performance of these crosses. The parity of the dams had no effect on the growth performance of their daughters. Their body weight variations are best explained by the gamma type function, which can be considered as a representative model of growth performance of three-breed crosses of Holstein Friesian, Brown Swiss and Hariana cattle during birth to 24 months of age.

Keywords

References

  1. Bhat, P.N. and Singh, R.N. (1978). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 48: 858-864.
  2. Chopra, S.C. (1990). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 60: 93-96.
  3. Devir, S. et al. (1995). J. Agric. Sci. Camb., 125: 415-424. Vol. 41, No. 4, 2007 249
  4. Ghosh, D. et al. (1979). Indian Vet. J., 56: 656-659.
  5. Halachmi, I. et al. (1997). Livestock Prod. Sci., 49: 239-246.
  6. Harvey, W.R. (1966). Least squares analysis of data with unequal sub-class number. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, D.C.
  7. Khedkar, J.N. et al. (1985). Livestock Advisor, 10: 6-9
  8. Koul, G.L. et al. (1985). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 50: 923-927
  9. Kulkarni, A.N. et al. (1982). Indian Vet. J., 59: 123-127.
  10. Maltz, E. et al. (1997). Livestock Prod. Res., 48: 175-86.
  11. Mishra, S.C. (1973). M.V.Sc. Thesis, Agra University, Agra.
  12. Nautiyal, L.P. and Bhat, P.N. (1989). Indian J. Anim. Sci., 59: 1007-1010.
  13. Nelder, J.A. (1966). Biometrics, 22: 128-141.
  14. Pandey, H.S. and Desai, R.N. (1976). Indian J. Heridity, 8(1-2): 21-25
  15. Pandey, H.N. et al. (1986). Indian Vet. J., 63: 754-760.
  16. Prasad, Shiv and Singh, Ramkaran (2001). Indian Vet. Med. J. 25: 133-36.
  17. Rathi, S.S and Balaine, D.S. (1984). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 37(4): 378-380
  18. Sikka, L.C. (1950). J. Dairy Res., 17: 231-52.
  19. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. Cochran (1967). Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.
  20. Srivastava, A.K. et al. (1984). Indian Vet. Med. J., 8: 67-69.
  21. Wood, P.D.P. (1976). Anim. Prod., 22 : 35-40.

Global Footprints