Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 42 issue 3 (september 2008) : 213-215

EFFICIENCY OF COMPUTERIZED RECORDING SYSTEM

C. Paul Princely Rajkumar, Francis Xavier, Leena Anil
1Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Trissur-680 651, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Rajkumar Princely Paul C., Xavier Francis, Anil Leena (2024). EFFICIENCY OF COMPUTERIZED RECORDING SYSTEM. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 42(3): 213-215. doi: .
A study was made to know the comparative efficiency of traditional manual record
management and computerized record management using indigenously developed software.
Computerized record management proved to be of better efficiency than the traditional
manual record management.
    1. Furman, J.W. and Hughes (1992). Vet. Med. 85: 920-940.
    2. Gaines, J.D. (1989). Vet. Med. 83: 532-543.
    3. Lissemore, K.D. et al. (1992). Can. Vet. J. 33: 114-119.
    4. Lucey, S. et al. (1983). Vet. Rec. 113: 294-298.
    5. Pepper, T.A. et al. (1977). Vet. Rec. 101: 177-180.
    6. Saha, S. and Kumar, S. (1999). Milcow, 21: 7-9.
    7. Sendecor, G.W. and Cocharn, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn.
    8. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, p.564.
    9. Williams, P.C.W. and Ward, W.R. (1989). Vet. Rec. 124: 265-268.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)