Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak
Print ISSN 0367-6722
Online ISSN 0976-0555
NAAS Rating 6.50
SJR 0.263
Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 47 issue 6 (december 2013) : 561-563

GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF CROSSBRED (LWY X DESI) BARROWS UNDER DIFFERENT FLOOR SPACE ALLOCATIONS

A. Gopinathan, K. Suresh Kumar, S.M.K. Karthickeyan, J. Ramesh, S.N. Sivaselvam

Affiliations

¹Post Graduate Research Institute in Animal Sciences, (TANUVAS) Kattupakkam - 603 203, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Gopinathan A., Kumar Suresh K., Karthickeyan S.M.K., Ramesh J., Sivaselvam S.N. (2024). GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF CROSSBRED (LWY X DESI) BARROWS UNDER DIFFERENT FLOOR SPACE ALLOCATIONS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 47(6): 561-563. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The effect of floor space allocation on growth rate and feed intake of crossbred barrows from 5th to 9th month of age was investigated. Three treatment groups with a floor space of 1.0 m2 (T1), 1.2 m2 (T2) and 1.8 m2 (T3) per pig were maintained and each group contains seven pigs and monthly body weight and feed intake were recorded. Significant difference (Pere highest in T2 (1.2 m2/pig) group. Hence, it was concluded that 1.2 m2 floor space/pig proved to be an optimum for finisher pigs to produce better growth rate.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Gehlbach, G.D., Becker, J.L., Cox, J.L., Harmon, B.G. and Jensen, A.H. (1966). Effects of floor space allowance and number per group on performance of growing - finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci., 25:386-391.
Meunier-Salaun, M.C., Vantrimponte, M.N., Raab, A. and Dantzer, R. (1987). Effect of floor area restriction, behavior and physiology of growing - finishing pig. J. Anim. Sci., 64:1371-1377.
Randolph, J.H., Cromwell, G.L., Stahly, T.S. and Kratzer, T.S. (1981). Effect of group size and space allowance on performance and behavior of swine. J. Anim. Sci., 53:922-927
Sharma, P.K., Saikia, S. and Baruah, K.K. (2004). Effect of stocking densities on growth performqnce and feed efficiency of Hampshire grower piglets reared under identical feeding and management. Indian Vet. J., 81:299.
Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1967). Statistical Methods. 6th edn. Iowa State Univ Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Wolter, B.F., Ellis, M., Corrigan, B.P., DeDecker, J.M., Curtis, S.E., Parr, E.N. and Webel, D.M. (2003). Effect of restricted post weaning growth resulting from reduced floor and feeder-trough space on pig growth performance to slaughter weight in a wean to finish production system. J. Anim. Sci., 81:836-842.
Yedukondalu, R. Srinivasa Rao, D. and Ravi, A. (2006). Effect of floor space on the performance of crossbred grower pigs. Indian Vet. J., 83:106.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF CROSSBRED (LWY X DESI) BARROWS UNDER DIFFERENT FLOOR SPACE ALLOCATIONS

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board