Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 124-126

COMPARISON OF SEED GERMINATION TEST WITH URINE BARIUM CHLORIDE TEST AND MILK COPPER SULPHATE TEST FOR EFFICACY TO DETECT PREGNANCY IN COWS

S. 'J. Krishna Raol, , T. Veena2,
1Department of Veterinary Physiology, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, Bangalore - 560024, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Raol Krishna 'J. S., Veena2 T. (2024). COMPARISON OF SEED GERMINATION TEST WITH URINE BARIUM CHLORIDE TEST AND MILK COPPER SULPHATE TEST FOR EFFICACY TO DETECT PREGNANCY IN COWS. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(2): 124-126. doi: .

ABSTRACT

The present study included per rectally confirmed pregnant (n=30) and non pregnant cows
(n=30), all milking, selected to conduct urine barium chloride test, milk copper sulphate test
and seed germination test for pregnancy. The data were assessed for significance using Cochran
Q test. The results indicated that the efficacies of true positive reaction for pregnancy and non
pregnancy status in cows were 100 per cent, each by seed germination test whereas 80 and 10
per cent respectively, by urine barium chloride test, and 90 and 13.33 per cent by milk copper
sulphate test.

REFERENCES

  1. Abilay, J.P. and Roussel, J.D. (1975). J. Dairy Sci., 58:134.
  2. Akhmadeev, A.N. and Vasilev, G.T. (1967). Veterinariya Moscow, 43:77-78.
  3. Avahikar, G.T. etaJ. (2002). In: 891' Session ofIndian Science Congress Association held from.Jd- 'J'hJanuary, 2002at Lucknow.
  4. EIpakov, K.A. and Cyganok, N.S. (1966). Anim. Breed. Abstr., 35:1319.
  5. Kavani, ES. etal. (1983). Indian J. Reprod,4:70-72.
  6. Maslov, N. and Smirnov, A. (1965). Mol. mjasn. Skotovod., 10:24-25.
  7. Snedecor, G.w. and Cochran, w.G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed.:oxford & ISH Pub. co, Culcuta. 126 INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH
  8. Stancev, S. and Angelov, K. (1966). Vet. Sbir., So!., 60:30-32.
  9. Temblador, AS.R and Acosta, B. H. (1971) In: XII InEm. Invest. Esc. Agric. Ganad. Inst. Techno/. Estud. Sup. Monterrey. 144.
  10. Temblador, AS.R. and Landa, N. (1971). In: XIIInfm. Invest. Esc. Agric. Ganad.Inst. Techno!. £stud. Sup. Monterrey. 145.
  11. Veena, T. and Narendranath, R (1993). Curro Sci., 65:989-990.
  12. Verma, RP. and Mishra, RR (1981). IndianJ. Dairy Sci., 23:133
  13. Vohra, S.C. and Kaikini, AS. (1992). Indian J. oE Reprod., 43:223.
  14. Wani. N. A et ai. (2003). Indian J. Dairy Sci., 56:1-8.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)