Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 43 issue 2 (june 2009) : 89-93

DETECTION OF MICROSATELLITE MARKERS IN POLYACRYLAMIDE GELS BY A FAST AND SENSITIVE SILVER STAINING METHOD USING BUFFALO BREEDS·

n.B. Shinde, B.V. GUiar, A.S. JinturKar, S.B. Adangale'
1Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani 431402, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shinde n.B., GUiar B.V., JinturKar A.S., Adangale' S.B. (2024). DETECTION OF MICROSATELLITE MARKERS IN POLYACRYLAMIDE GELS BY A FAST AND SENSITIVE SILVER STAINING METHOD USING BUFFALO BREEDS·. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(2): 89-93. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A fast, reliable, cheap and sensitive silver staining method to detect microsatellite markers in
polyacrylamide gel was modified from the two standard staining procedures. The main differences
between standard method and modified. method concerned are the pre-exposure of gel with
formaldehyde during silver nitrate impregnation, the addition of sodium hydroxidf? instead of
sodium thiosulphate and sodium carbonate during development, the inclusion of the absolute
ethanol with acetic acid in the stop solution and the duration of the different reaction steps. The
modified method allowed the detection of polymorphisms for simple sequence repeats (SSR)
with different buffalo breeds with the lower backgrounds and higher conservation duration of the
gels and allowed reutilization of most of the solutions used in the staining procedure for 4-5
times, making it quite cheap

REFERENCES

  1. Barker, J.S.F. et al. (1997). Anim. Genet., 28:103-115.
  2. Barker, J.S.F. eta/. (2001). J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 118:213-233.
  3. Bassam, B.J. et a/. (1991). Anal. Biochem. 196: 80-83.
  4. Beidler,J.I et a/. (1982). Anal. Biochem. 126: 374-380.
  5. Blum, H. et al. (1987).Electrophoresis. 8:93-99.
  6. Brezinsky, L. eta/. (1993)', Anim. Genet., 24:73.
  7. Christensen,M. et a/.(1999).Scand.J.Clin.Lab.Invest. 59:167-178.
  8. Goldman,O.and Merril, C.R. (1982). Electrophoresis. 3:24-26.
  9. Halima, B. etal. (2006).Biotechnol. Agron. Soc.Environ. 10(2),77-81.
  10. U MH et a/.(2002). Genet.Sel.EvoI.34(6):729-744.
  11. Luikart, G. et a/. (1999). Aim. Genet., 30:431-438.
  12. Maudet C. et a/. (2002t. Mol. Ecol., 11:421-436.
  13. Merril, C.R. etal. (1981). Science. 211:1437-1438.
  14. Moioli, B. etal. (2001). Livestock Production Sci., 70:203-211.
  15. Ritz, L.R. et a/. (2000). Anim. Genet., 31(3):178cI85
  16. Sanguinetti, C.J. eta/. (1994). Biotechniques.17:915-919.
  17. Senthil, M. et al. (1996). Int. J. Anim. Sd, 11:413-414.
  18. Sommerville, L.L.and Wang, K. (1981). Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun. 120:530-548.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)