Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First ArticlesArchive

volume 43 issue 1 (march 2009) : 49-52

EFFECT OF FEEDING PROBIOTICS ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND FEED CONVERSION EFFICIENCY IN GOAT*

A
A.S. Jinturkar
B
B.V. Gujar
D
D.S. Chauhan
R
R.A. Patil
1Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani-431 402, India.

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Jinturkar A.S., Gujar B.V., Chauhan D.S., Patil R.A. (2025). EFFECT OF FEEDING PROBIOTICS ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND FEED CONVERSION EFFICIENCY IN GOAT*. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(1): 49-52. doi: .

ABSTRACT

An attempt was made to study the effect of supplementation of Lactobacillus acidophillus and
Saccharomyces cerevisiac individually and combination of both to feed, on growth performance
and feed conversion efficiency in goats. Sixteen of similar age and body weight were randomly
allotted to four treatments viz, T0 : concentrate (without probiotics), T1 : 2gm Lactobacillus acidophillus
per kg feed, T2: 2gm Saccharomyces Cerevisiac per kg feed, and T3 : mixture of 1g Lactobacillus
acidophillus + 1g Saccharomyces cerevisiac per kg feed was fed to the Osmanabadi goats. Observations
on the body weight gain showed the significant (P

REFERENCES

  1. Birch K.S., et al (1994). Sheep and Goat Res. J., 10: 201-2206.
  2. Caton J. S., et al (1993). J. Anim. Sci. 71:779 - 787.
  3. Chademana, I. and Offer N.W. (1990). Anim. Produ. 50:483-489.
  4. Arkansas, U.S.A., pp. 45 - 55.
  5. Erasmus L. J., et al (1992). J. Dairy Sci. 75 : 3056 - 3065.
  6. Fuller, J. R (1979). J. Appl. Bactaiol. 60:365.
  7. Kang, W. S., et al (1992). Korean J. Anim. Sci. 34 : 108-115.
  8. Kmet, V., et al (1993). Archives Anim. Nutr. 44 : 1-10.
  9. Lal, Murari, et al. (1987). Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 4: 109-113.
  10. Mir, Z. and Mir P. S. (1994). J. Anim. Sci. 72 : 537-545.
  11. Mudgal, V.D., et al (1995). In Advances in Dairy Animal Production. International Book Distributing Co., Delhi. pp 293.
  12. Ramanmalik and Sharma, D.D. (1998). Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 15: 228-231.
  13. Rao, N.T. et al. (2003). Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 18:133-137.
  14. Rouzbehan, H, et al (1994). Anim. Produ., 54 : 147-150.
  15. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1982). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Culcutta.
  16. Williams, P.E.V. and Newbold, C. (1990). Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, Butter worth, London, U.K. pp:211-227.
  17. Yidz, G. Kucukersank, et al (1995). Veteriner Fakultesi dergisi Ankara universities 42:169-171.
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research
Article Metrics
Metrics Icon
0
Views
0
Citations
Reviewed By
Share Article
Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    volume 43 issue 1 (march 2009) : 49-52

    EFFECT OF FEEDING PROBIOTICS ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND FEED CONVERSION EFFICIENCY IN GOAT*

    A
    A.S. Jinturkar
    B
    B.V. Gujar
    D
    D.S. Chauhan
    R
    R.A. Patil
    1Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Marathwada Agricultural University, Parbhani-431 402, India.

    • Submitted|

    • First Online |

    • doi

    Cite article:- Jinturkar A.S., Gujar B.V., Chauhan D.S., Patil R.A. (2025). EFFECT OF FEEDING PROBIOTICS ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND FEED CONVERSION EFFICIENCY IN GOAT*. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(1): 49-52. doi: .

    ABSTRACT

    An attempt was made to study the effect of supplementation of Lactobacillus acidophillus and
    Saccharomyces cerevisiac individually and combination of both to feed, on growth performance
    and feed conversion efficiency in goats. Sixteen of similar age and body weight were randomly
    allotted to four treatments viz, T0 : concentrate (without probiotics), T1 : 2gm Lactobacillus acidophillus
    per kg feed, T2: 2gm Saccharomyces Cerevisiac per kg feed, and T3 : mixture of 1g Lactobacillus
    acidophillus + 1g Saccharomyces cerevisiac per kg feed was fed to the Osmanabadi goats. Observations
    on the body weight gain showed the significant (P

    REFERENCES

    1. Birch K.S., et al (1994). Sheep and Goat Res. J., 10: 201-2206.
    2. Caton J. S., et al (1993). J. Anim. Sci. 71:779 - 787.
    3. Chademana, I. and Offer N.W. (1990). Anim. Produ. 50:483-489.
    4. Arkansas, U.S.A., pp. 45 - 55.
    5. Erasmus L. J., et al (1992). J. Dairy Sci. 75 : 3056 - 3065.
    6. Fuller, J. R (1979). J. Appl. Bactaiol. 60:365.
    7. Kang, W. S., et al (1992). Korean J. Anim. Sci. 34 : 108-115.
    8. Kmet, V., et al (1993). Archives Anim. Nutr. 44 : 1-10.
    9. Lal, Murari, et al. (1987). Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 4: 109-113.
    10. Mir, Z. and Mir P. S. (1994). J. Anim. Sci. 72 : 537-545.
    11. Mudgal, V.D., et al (1995). In Advances in Dairy Animal Production. International Book Distributing Co., Delhi. pp 293.
    12. Ramanmalik and Sharma, D.D. (1998). Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 15: 228-231.
    13. Rao, N.T. et al. (2003). Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 18:133-137.
    14. Rouzbehan, H, et al (1994). Anim. Produ., 54 : 147-150.
    15. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1982). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Culcutta.
    16. Williams, P.E.V. and Newbold, C. (1990). Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, Butter worth, London, U.K. pp:211-227.
    17. Yidz, G. Kucukersank, et al (1995). Veteriner Fakultesi dergisi Ankara universities 42:169-171.
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us
      Published In
      Indian Journal of Animal Research

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)