Indian Journal of Animal Research

  • Chief EditorK.M.L. Pathak

  • Print ISSN 0367-6722

  • Online ISSN 0976-0555

  • NAAS Rating 6.50

  • SJR 0.263

  • Impact Factor 0.4 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Scopus, AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Indian Journal of Animal Research, volume 44 issue 2 (june 2010) : 127 - 130

COMBINING ABILITY EFFECTS FOR IMPORTANT BROILER TRAITS OF JAPANESE QUAIL (COTURNIX COTURNIX JAPONICA)

N. K. Shit1, N. Ghosh, P. K. Senapati2
1Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya Mohanpur, Nadia – 741 252, West Bengal, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shit1 K. N., Ghosh N., Senapati2 K. P. (2024). COMBINING ABILITY EFFECTS FOR IMPORTANT BROILER TRAITS OF JAPANESE QUAIL (COTURNIX COTURNIX JAPONICA). Indian Journal of Animal Research. 44(2): 127 - 130. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Combining ability effects for some broiler traits of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix
japonica) were studied under warm-humid conditions of West Bengal, India. The data were
collected on pure and cross line quails from a 3 x 3 complete diallel cross experiment for body
weight of individual quail chicks from day old to 8th week of age at fortnight interval and
conformation traits viz., breast angle, keel length and shank length at 6th and 8th weeks of age to
estimate GCA, SCA and reciprocal effects. GCA, SCA and reciprocal effects were significant for
most of the traits studied. The estimates of combining ability effects and heterosis effect of
different genetic groups suggested that the ML (meat line) x SL (synthetic line) cross is suited
best as broiler quail chick.

REFERENCES

  1. Aggarwal, C. K. et al. (1979) British Poult. Sci. 20(2): 185-190.
  2. El-Ibiary, H. M. et al. (1966) Poult. Sci. 45: 463-469.
  3. Fairfull, R. W. et al. (1983) British Poult. Sci. 24(2): 133-158.
  4. Fairfull, R. W. et al. (1987) Canadian J.Anim. Sci. 67: 663-680.
  5. Ghosh, N. and Samanta, R. (2008) In: Manual on Avain Production and Management, International Book
  6. Distributing Co., Lucknow, pp. 11.
  7. Goto, E. and Nordskog, A. W. (1959) Poult. Sci. 38: 1381-1388.
  8. Griffing, B. (1956) Australian J.Bio. Sci. 9: 463-493.
  9. Harvey, W. R. (1960) Least-square Analysis of Data with Unequal Sub-class Numbers. U S Department of
  10. Agriculture, USA.
  11. Hyankova, L. et al. (2002) British Poult. Sci. 43: 508-517.
  12. Jain, L. S. and Chaudhary, A. L. (1984) Indian J. Anim. Sci. 54: 230-234.
  13. Mohammed, M.D. et al. (2005) International J. Poult. Sci. 4: 468-471.
  14. Naryana, A. D. (1977) British Poult. Sci. 18(1): 107-114.
  15. Nath, M. et al. (2000) In: VI Annual Conference of Indian Association for the Advancement of Veterinary
  16. Research held from 18-19, February, 2000 at IVRI, Izatnagar, India.
  17. Nordskog, A. W. and Ghostley, F. J. (1954) Poult. Sci. 33: 704-715.
  18. Odeh, F.M. et al. (2003) Poult. Sci. 82: 25-30.
  19. Sakthivel, L. et al., (2000) In: XXI World’s Poultry Congress held from 20-24 August, 2000 at Montreal,
  20. Quebec, Canada.
  21. Sharma, R.P. et al., (2008) In: Poultry Production in India, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New
  22. Delhi, pp. 166-169.
  23. Shit, N.K. et al. (1996) Indian J. Anim. Sci. 66: 1042-1045
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)