Changes in proximate composition
The proximate composition of smoked and dried eel is summarized in Table 1. On day 0, the moisture, protein, lipid and ash contents of the dried eel were 13.1%, 58.2%, 14.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Correspondingly, the smoked eel exhibited moisture, protein, lipid and ash contents of 15.3%, 53.4%, 13.5% and 12.5%, respectively. During storage, an increasing trend in moisture content was observed, while the levels of protein, lipid and ash exhibited a gradual decline over time.
Moisture
Smoking and drying are traditional preservation methods aimed at lowering the moisture content of fish to levels that inhibit microbial proliferation and spoilage. In the present investigation, the initial moisture content of eel subjected to drying and smoking was recorded at 13.1% and 15.3%, respectively. Over the course of storage, both products exhibited a progressive increase in moisture content. After 30 days, the moisture level in dried eel increased significantly under ambient conditions, reaching 17.5% (
p<0.05), while under refrigerated storage it rose to 14.0% (
p>0.05). In smoked eel, moisture content similarly increased to 16.3% under ambient storage and 16.2% under refrigeration, with both changes being statistically non-significant (
p>0.05). The progressive changes in moisture content during storage may be related to the different forms of water present in fish muscle. Fish muscle contains bound and free water, with free water showing greater mobility and being more readily lost during drying, thereby contributing to the reduction in moisture content (
Andersen and Rinnan, 2002;
da Silva Carneiro et al., 2016). Following drying, the low-moisture product may absorb atmospheric moisture during storage when a moisture gradient exists between the fish and the surrounding environment. This moisture migration may be greater under ambient conditions, resulting in greater moisture uptake than under refrigeration. Increased moisture availability may subsequently favour microbial growth and accelerate quality deterioration
(Fitri et al., 2022). These findings are consistent with earlier studies that have documented similar trends of moisture uptake during storage of smoked and dried fish products (
Ikutegbe and Sikoki, 2014;
Farid et al., 2014; Ayeloja et al., 2020). The hygroscopic nature of dried fish products may further contribute to moisture absorption during storage
(Olayemi et al., 2015).
Protein
On day 0, the protein content in dried and smoked eel was recorded at 58.2% and 53.4%, respectively. This high protein concentration is primarily attributed to moisture reduction during the drying and smoking processes, which leads to protein densification and aggregation (
Linus-Chibuezeh et al., 2022). Over the storage period, a gradual decline in protein content was evident in both product types. In dried eel, protein levels decreased to 55.2% under ambient conditions (
p<0.05) and to 55.8% under refrigerated storage (
p<0.05). Similarly, smoked eel exhibited a reduction in protein content to 52.4% at ambient temperature (
p<0.05) and 52.6% under refrigeration (
p>0.05). These patterns align with previous reports indicating a progressive decline in protein content in smoked-dried and sun-dried fish during storage
(Farid et al., 2014; Ikutegbe and Sikoki, 2014;
Jakhar et al., 2025). The observed decrease is likely associated with the leaching of water-soluble protein fractions and the degradation of protein molecules into volatile nitrogenous compounds, including total volatile bases (TVB), ammonia and hydrogen sulfide
(Daramola et al., 2007; Ikutegbe and Sikoki, 2014;
Ayeloja et al., 2020).
Lipid
A progressive reduction in lipid content was noted in both smoked and dried eel samples throughout the storage duration. In the dried eel, lipid concentration declined from an initial value of 14.2% to 11.7% under ambient conditions (
p<0.05) and to 13.2% during refrigerated storage (
p<0.05). Similarly, smoked samples exhibited a decrease in lipid content from 13.5% to 11.8% at ambient temperature (
p<0.05) and to 12.3% under refrigeration (
p<0.05). This reduction in lipid levels over time is likely due to lipid degradation processes, particularly oxidative rancidity and hydrolysis of susceptible lipid fractions, which are known to occur during the storage of fish products
(Daramola et al., 2007; Farid et al., 2014; Ikutegbe and Sikoki, 2014;
Ayeloja et al., 2020). The greater reduction under ambient conditions indicates accelerated lipid degradation at higher temperatures, whereas refrigeration slowed these reactions and favoured better lipid retention. The observed decline is also consistent with the increases in PV and FFA recorded in the present study, indicating progressive lipid deterioration during storage.
Ash
The initial ash content was relatively high in both dried and smoked eel samples, recorded at 11.2% and 12.5%, respectively. Elevated ash levels in dried fish products have similarly been reported in previous studies
(Rana et al., 2020), likely reflecting the concentration of mineral components following moisture removal. Over the storage period, a gradual decline in ash content was observed in both treatments; however, the reduction was not statistically significant (
p>0.05). In the case of dried eel stored at ambient conditions, ash content decreased marginally from 11.2% to 10.9%, whereas under refrigerated conditions, it reduced to 11.0% (
p>0.05). Similarly, in smoked eel, ash content showed a slight decline from 12.5% to 11.9% at ambient temperature and to 12.1% under refrigeration, with no significant differences observed (
p>0.05). These observations are consistent with the trends reported by
Olayemi et al., (2015). The relatively small changes in ash content suggest that mineral constituents remained comparatively stable during storage.
Biochemical changes
Total volatile base-nitrogen
Total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N), a recognized marker of protein degradation and microbial spoilage
(Bekhit et al., 2021), demonstrated an upward trend throughout the storage period (Fig 2). TVB-N increased progressively in both dried and smoked fish, with a greater increase under ambient storage than under refrigeration. From an initial level of 6.0 and 8.0 mg N/100 g in dried and smoked fish, respectively, TVB-N increased by day 30 to 31.2 and 30.0 mg N/100 g under ambient storage, compared with 21.3 and 22.3 mg N/100 g under refrigeration. The elevated levels under ambient conditions approached or surpassed the spoilage threshold of 30-35 mg N/100/ g established by the European Commission (
E.C. 1995;
Bekhit et al., 2021), indicating substantial protein deterioration and loss of freshness. These values were comparable with
Ayeloja et al., (2020), who reported an increase in TVB-N from 16.50 to 26.62 mg/100 g in smoked
Oreochromis niloticus during 56 days of storage. Similarly,
Pankyamma et al., (2025) reported an increase in TVB-N from 19.17 to 49.32 mg/100 g in dried fish during 180 days of ambient storage. Although refrigeration effectively retarded the formation of volatile nitrogenous compounds, it did not fully inhibit spoilage over extended storage. These findings align with earlier reports documenting progressive increases in TVB-N content in smoked and dried fish during storage (
Al-Reza et al., 2015;
Mosarrat et al., 2016; Jakhar et al., 2025).
Peroxide value
Peroxide value (PV), which reflects the formation of primary oxidation products during lipid degradation
(Zhang et al., 2021), showed a progressive increase over the storage period, with markedly higher values in samples stored under ambient conditions (Fig 3). PV increased from 1.6 and 1.9 meq/kg on day 0 in dried and smoked eel, respectively, to 8.5 and 8.5 meq/kg under ambient storage by day 30. Under refrigeration, the corresponding values were lower, reaching 6.3 and 6.9 meq/kg, respectively. The increase indicates progressive lipid peroxidation, which is likely accelerated at higher storage temperatures. Lipid oxidation involves the formation of primary hydroperoxides and their subsequent decomposition into secondary products that may contribute to rancid odours and undesirable flavours
(Fitri et al., 2022). PV levels approaching or surpassing 10-20 meq/kg are generally associated with the onset of rancidity and deterioration in sensory attributes of fish products
(Raeisi et al., 2016; Barros et al., 2023). The values observed were comparable with previous reports.
Ayeloja et al., (2020) reported an increase in PV from 7.74 to 8.18 meq/kg in smoked
Oreochromis niloticus during 56 days of ambient storage.
Salami et al., (2024) reported increases from 1.08 to 6.14 meq/kg in oven-dried
Clarias gariepinus and from 1.92 to 12.94 meq/kg in smoked fish during 42 days of room-temperature storage. More recently,
Jakhar et al., (2025) reported day-30 PV values of 9.5 and 10.2 meq/kg in dried and smoked
Salmophasia bacaila, respectively, under ambient storage, compared with 6.3 and 5.33 meq/kg under refrigeration.
Free fatty acids
Free fatty acid (FFA) content, a key indicator of lipid hydrolysis and early-stage rancidity
(Daramola et al., 2007; Tenyang et al., 2020), showed a gradual and continuous increase during the storage period (Fig 4). FFA increased from 0.2% and 0.4% oleic acid on day 0 in dried and smoked fish, respectively, to 2.1% and 2.3% under ambient storage by day 30. Under refrigeration, the corresponding values increased to 1.2% and 1.5%, respectively. The greater accumulation of FFA under ambient conditions suggests enhanced lipid hydrolysis, potentially associated with greater enzymatic and microbial lipase activity
(Ye et al., 2024). Similar increases have been reported in traditionally dried and smoked fish.
Jakhar et al., (2025) reported FFA increases from 0.45 to 2.85% in smoked
S. bacaila under ambient storage and from 0.45 to 1.30% under refrigeration, while dried fish increased from 0.25 to 2.61% and 2.30%, respectively. These findings are consistent with previous reports documenting the accumulation of FFAs in smoked and dried fish during storage
(Daramola et al., 2007; Ayeloja et al., 2020). Despite evident lipid breakdown in both storage conditions, the reduced FFA formation in refrigerated smoked samples suggests that lower temperatures effectively limit microbial and enzymatic lipolysis (
Suárez-Medina et al., 2024). FFA concentrations ranging from 0.5% to 1.5% oleic acid are associated with perceptible rancid odors and flavors, negatively impacting the sensory quality and consumer acceptability of fish products
(Daramola et al., 2007).
Microbial changes
The initial total plate count (TPC) was 4.58 and 3.27 log CFU/g in dried and smoked eel, respectively. TPC increased progressively during the 30-day storage period, reaching 5.80 and 5.34 log CFU/g in dried eel under ambient and refrigerated conditions, respectively, while smoked eel reached 4.75 and 4.50 log CFU/g under the corresponding conditions (Fig 5). The initially low microbial loads may be attributed to reduced water activity in both dried and smoked products, which suppresses microbial growth
(Fitri et al., 2022). The lower TPC observed in smoked eel than in dried eel may be attributed to the combined effects of thermal treatment and antimicrobial smoke constituents, particularly phenolic compounds, formaldehyde, acetic acid and other organic acids
(Adeyeye et al., 2015). Smoke-derived phenolics possess antimicrobial properties and can contribute to microbial inhibition in smoked fish
(Adeyeye et al., 2015; Sulfiana et al., 2026). The present TPC values were comparable with recent findings of
Sulfiana et al., (2026), who reported an increase from 2.84 to 6.68 log CFU/g in traditionally smoked
Rastrelliger kanagurta during 6 days of ambient storage. In the present study, smoked eel remained below 5 log CFU/g after 30 days under both ambient (4.75 log CFU/g) and refrigerated (4.50 log CFU/g) storage, whereas dried eel exceeded 5 log CFU/g under both conditions. As per microbiological standards for fish and fishery products, TPC levels exceeding 5 log CFU/g are indicative of potential spoilage and decreased consumer acceptability, particularly in dried and smoked products (
FSSAI, 2023). Thus, the comparatively lower TPC in smoked eel suggests reduced microbial proliferation, likely due to the combined preservative effects of dehydration, heat treatment and antimicrobial smoke constituents. The observed TPC values provide an indication of the overall microbial load and its changes during storage; however, TPC alone does not provide information on the presence or absence of specific foodborne pathogens.
Sensory changes
The sensory evaluation of dried and smoked eel was conducted using a 9-point hedonic scale, revealing a decline in overall acceptability from day 0 to day 30 of storage (Fig 6). On day 0, both products received high scores, indicative of their initial freshness and favorable organoleptic attributes. The progressive decline in sensory scores during storage may be associated with lipid oxidation, microbial proliferation, proteolytic changes and the accumulation of volatile compounds responsible for undesirable odours and flavours
(Jakhar et al., 2026). These deteriorative reactions are generally accelerated under ambient conditions, resulting in greater loss of sensory acceptability than under refrigeration
(Tavares et al., 2021; Pan et al., 2025). Conversely, refrigerated storage better preserved sensory attributes, which is consistent with the lower microbial growth and slower lipid oxidation observed in the present study. The greater sensory deterioration under ambient storage therefore corresponds with the increases observed in TVB-N, PV, FFA and TPC, supporting their combined contribution to the decline in overall acceptability.
Study limitations
The present study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the biochemical and microbial findings. First, biochemical and microbial analyses were conducted using a single biological sample for each treatment, with replicate measurements representing analytical rather than independent biological replicates. Therefore, statistical inference and estimates of biological variability could not be appropriately established for these parameters and the observed changes should be interpreted descriptively. Second, ambient storage was conducted under a relatively broad temperature range of 20–40 °C and the temperature was not continuously monitored throughout the storage period. Consequently, temporal fluctuations in ambient temperature may have contributed to the observed changes and limit the ability to attribute differences solely to a defined storage temperature. Third, water activity (a
w) was not measured in the present study. Thus, although changes in moisture content were observed, the relationship between water availability and microbial or biochemical changes could not be directly assessed. Future studies should incorporate multiple independent biological replicates, continuous monitoring of storage temperature and relative humidity and direct measurement of a
w to provide more robust and mechanistic assessments of the storage stability of traditionally processed fish products.