Socio-economic profile of respondents
Table 1 presents the distribution of sample households by location. The total sample of 640 consumer respondents was distributed across urban (400), semi-urban (120) and rural (120) areas, with Delhi contributing the largest share of 175 respondents.
The income distribution of the sample households is shown in Table 2. More than half of the respondents (56.25%) are from the low-income group with an average monthly family income of ₹ 66,968. The middle-income group comprised 29.53 per cent (average ₹ 1,29,423 per month) and high-income group 14.22 per cent (average ₹ 2,37,014 per month). The average monthly income of a family was ₹ 1,09,590 on an average. Average incomes of the three groups were significantly different from each other as indicated by different superscripts (a, b, c). These strata are broadly in line with findings from consumer surveys on dairy products in Indian cities
(Das et al., 2017; Kerketta et al., 2023).
The summary of the socio-economic characteristics of the sample is presented below. Nuclear families were predominant with 90.00 per cent. 62.81 per cent of samples were vegetarian. The main occupation of the households was salaried employment (50.00%), followed by self-employed (35.00%) and businessman (15.00%). These features are indication of the composition of the urban, semi-urban and rural consumer populations in Northern India.
The distribution by family type, food habit and occupation is also presented graphically in Fig 1, Fig 2 and Fig 3 to facilitate visual comparison.
Major functional dairy food brands available in Northern India
Functional dairy foods are marketed in Northern India through national cooperatives, private companies and regional dairy federations. Functional dairy foods were classified into fermented and non-fermented functional dairy foods. Table 3 shows the main brands found in the seven cities of the study.
Awareness of functional dairy foods
The awareness level of functional dairy foods across different income groups is presented in Table 4. In total 73.75 per cent of the 640 respondents were aware of functional dairy foods but only 15.47 per cent of consumers were aware before any explanation. Another 58.28 per cent aware after explanation of functional dairy foods and 26.25 per cent were still completely unaware about the products.
Govindrao (2013) found 83.00 per cent awareness with functional foods in urban Maharashtra and
Haripriya and Mageshwari (2021) reported 73.70 per cent awareness in Tamil Nadu.
Dhasarathan et al., (2024) reported 84.00 per cent awareness in districts of Chennai and Salem.
Chaudhari et al. (2024) reported that social media, books and word-of-mouth were the major sources of awareness among students in Anand.
Makwana and Raval (2025) reported moderate awareness and generally positive health beliefs among consumers of probiotic dairy foods in India.
There was a clear income gradient of awareness. The proportion of those who were not aware fell from 36.11 per cent for low-income households to 6.59 per cent for high-income households. The percentage of those who were aware only after the explanation increased from 49.17 per cent in the low-income group to 78.02 per cent in the high-income group. So, income not only decides whether consumers can afford these products, but also how open they are to learning about functional dairy foods.
Das et al., (2017) and
Parasuraman et al., (2021) have reported similar findings.
The district wise pattern of awareness is shown in Fig 4. Delhi had the maximum overall awareness at 91.43 per cent followed by Chandigarh at 89.33 per cent and Jaipur at 80.00 per cent. Kathua had the lowest awareness at 46.25 per cent, Alwar was at 52.50 per cent and Jammu at 60.00 per cent, also far behind the urban areas average. The share of those completely unaware was between 8.57 per cent in Delhi and 53.75 per cent in Kathua.
Source of information on functional dairy foods
Table 5 presents the sources through which aware respondents (n=472) first learned about functional dairy foods. Social media was the most important source (40.68 per cent), reflecting the dominance of Instagram, YouTube and WhatsApp in the Northern Indian cities. Television advertisement was second with 19.70 per cent followed by word of mouth through friends, relatives and neighbours with 18.86 per cent. The least was from newspapers at 9.75 per cent while 11.02 per cent was from Internet-based searches. This social media dominance contrasts with
Dhasarathan et al. (2024) who found television advertisement as the primary source in Tamil Nadu and
Das et al., (2017) who found electronic media, internet and friends as roughly equally important in Delhi. This shift towards social media is consistent with the accelerated pace of digital adoption in India, where internet and smartphone usage have expanded significantly among urban and semi-urban areas during the period 2020-2024 which has also been noticed by
Chaturvedi et al., (2024) in their study of consumer behaviour patterns across the Indian dairy supply chain.
Fig 5 shows the district-wise source pattern. Social media was the most used source in all the seven cities, least in Delhi (37.50 per cent) and maximum in Jaipur (46.67 per cent). Regional cooperatives Verka and Saras invest significantly in broadcast advertising in Chandigarh (23.88%) and Jaipur (21.67%), where television advertisement was more prominent. Friends/Relatives/Neigbours or word of mouth was relatively more significant in Alwar (23.81%) and Kathua (24.32%) in line with lower digital connectivity in smaller cities where personal networks compensate for limited media exposure. Internet was the most important in Jammu (17.78%) which might be indicative of the government-driven mobile connectivity schemes in the Union Territory.