Crop growth rate
The results of the statistical analysis, shown in Table (3) and Fig 1 (A, B), indicate that increasing phosphorus levels led to an increase in the daily growth rates of the plants by all application methods, in cultivars, during both growing seasons. The daily growth rates of plants treated with soil-applied phosphorus were lower than those of plants fertilized using the other two application methods, across all phosphorus levels, for both cultivars and in both seasons. The Baghdad cultivar outperformed the Babylon cultivar in terms of growth rate across all phosphorus levels and application methods in both seasons.
The Baghdad cultivar recorded the highest growth rate at level (p3) for the foliar application method, with values of 60.81 and 58.97 kg/ha/day for the 1
st and 2
nd seasons, respectively. Under the same treatment, the Babylon cultivar recorded values of 58.34 and 57.81 kg/ha/day for the 1
st and 2
nd seasons, respectively. The lowest growth rate was recorded by the control treatment (p0) across all application methods, with average values of 29.04 kg/ha/day in the first season and 29.07 kg/ha/day in the second season.
Dry weight
The results of the statistical analysis, presented in Table 3 and Fig 2 (A, B), demonstrate the superiority of the foliar phosphorus application method with levels in producing dry weight, of cultivars in both growing seasons. In contrast, the soil application treatment resulted in the lowest dry weight for both cultivars, across all added phosphorus levels and in both seasons.
The results also indicate that the Baghdad cultivar outperformed the Babylon cultivar across all treatments and in both seasons. Furthermore, increasing the levels of phosphorus added
via the different methods led to an increase in the dry weight of both cultivars, across all added phosphorus levels and in both growing seasons.
The highest dry weight values were recorded for treatment (p3) with the Baghdad cultivar, reaching 6920.0 and 6135.3 kg/ha in the 1
st and 2
nd, respectively. The minimum values were in the control treatment (p0) across all application methods, averaging 3468.1 and 2683.9 kg/ha for the Baghdad cultivar in the 1
st and 2
nd season, respectively.
For the Babylon cultivar, the optimum values were recorded at level (p3) with the foliar application method, reaching 6712.3 and 6006.2 kg/ha for the two seasons respectively, while the lowest values were in the control treatment, averaging 3356.2 and 2627.6 kg/ha for the two seasons respectively.
Note: There appears to be a typographical error in the original text for the Babylon control in the second season (26277.6). The value 2627.6 kg/ha, which is consistent with the context and the first-season value, has been used in the translation.
Grain yield
The results shown in Table 3 and Fig 3 (A, B), revealed that foliar application of phosphorus was superior in grain yield compared to soil application and combined soil and foliar application treatments for all phosphorus levels applied, for both cultivars and for both growing seasons. Plants treated with soil-applied phosphorus yielded the lowest grain production for both cultivars, across all phosphorus levels and in both growing seasons. Plants receiving phosphorus via the combined soil and foliar application method produced a grain yield higher than the soil application treatment but lower than the foliar application treatment, across all treatments.
Notably, plants fertilized with 20 kg P/ha
via foliar application yielded higher than plants fertilized with 90 kg P
2O
5 via soil application, for both cultivars and in both growing seasons.
The highest grain yield was observed in the foliar phosphorus application treatment at the 30 kg P ha
-1 level for both the Baghdad and Babylon cultivars, reaching 4.367 and 4.017 t/ha respectively in the first season and 4.367 and 4.060 t/ha in the second season.
Plants in the control treatment (p0) produced the lowest grain yield for both cultivars and in both seasons, with an average of 1.297 t/ha in the first season and 1.418 t/ha in the second season.
Phosphorus uptake
The results of the statistical analysis in Table (3) and Fig 4 (A and B) demonstrate the superiority of the foliar phosphorus application in phosphorus uptake by cultivars during both the seasons. In contrast, the soil application treatment resulted in the lowest amount of phosphorus taken by both cultivars, across all added phosphorus levels and in both seasons.
The results also indicate that the Baghdad cultivar outperformed the Babylon cultivar in phosphorus uptake across all treatments in both seasons. Furthermore, increasing the levels of phosphorus added via the different methods led to an increase in the amount of phosphorus absorbed by cultivars, in both growing seasons.
The highest values for the quantity of phosphorus absorbed were recorded for treatment (p3) with the Baghdad cultivar under the foliar application method, reaching 29.48 and 26.33 kg/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively. The lowest values were in the control treatment (p0) across all application methods, averaging 5.72 and 4.20 kg/ha for the Baghdad cultivar in the first and second seasons, respectively.
For the Babylon cultivar, the highest values were recorded at level (p3), reaching 28.19 and 21.56 kg/ha for the two seasons respectively, while the lowest values were in the control treatment, reaching 5.53 and 4.12 kg/ha for the two seasons, respectively.
Fertilizer use efficiency
Table 3 and Fig 5 (A, B) display the results of the statistical analysis, indicating that foliar application of phosphorus was superior in phosphorus use efficiency for all applied phosphorus levels, by cultivars during both growing seasons compared to the other two application methods. The results also show that the lowest efficiency value was recorded with the soil application of phosphorus for all treatments. Furthermore, the results indicate that increasing phosphorus levels led to a decrease in phosphorus use efficiency for all treatments (except for the mixed application method in the second season). The results also show that the Baghdad cultivar outperformed the Babylon cultivar. For all treatments, the highest efficiency value was recorded at the p1 level for the foliar application method, reaching 84.58 and 74.25% for the Baghdad cultivar and 84.11 and 55.27% for the Babylon cultivar in 1
st and 2
nd seasons, respectively. The lowest efficiency values were recorded with the soil application method at level p3, reaching 17.66 and 17.29% for the Baghdad cultivar and 16.0and 16.91% for the Babylon cultivar during the 1
st and 2
nd growing seasons, respectively.
The results of this study further indicated that foliar application of P can significantly surpass soil and mix methods on increasing crop growth rate (Fig 1), total dry weight (Fig 2), grain yield (Fig 3), phosphorus uptake (Fig 4) and phosphorus utilization efficiency (Fig 5). This was accomplished even though the soil and the combined methods received three times more phosphorus than the foliar method. These results are consistent with other findings that the efficiency of foliar application in supplying nutrients is related to its rapid delivery directly into plants (leaves) and enhanced uptake and use of nutrient. This strategy may also reduce problems such as soil nutrient fixation and shortage in low moisture conditions. Furthermore, application of foliar fertilizers provides a better and extended balanced nutrition during various growth stages leading to improved dry matter and grain yield
(Izhar et al., 2020; Valkama et al., 2009; Tadros et al., 2019; Kumar et al., 2018).
The results also indicated that addition of phosphorus by various methods increased all traits. This may be attributed to the crucial function of phosphorus in plant physiological processes; cell division and elongation are influenced by phosphorus, leading to strong vegetative growth and accumulation of dry matter. Phosphorus also favors the establishment of a well-developed root system to aid in an efficient uptake of water and nutrients, which positively influences growth parameters as plant height, leaf area and spike length, finally enhanced yield components like grain number and thousand-grain weight. Higher phosphorus concentration increases its availability in the soil and absorption by the plant, which eventually improves level of photosynthesis dry matter accumulation and grain yield. These findings are in agreement with
Islam et al., (2013); Al-Maeni and Al-Bajary (2019);
Samreen and Kausar (2019);
Deng et al., (2018); Mumtaz and Khan (2023) all proved the beneficial effect of elevated phosphorus application on wheat growth and yield.
The results also indicate that the Baghdad variety outperformed the Babylon variety in growth and production. The genetic difference between the varieties showed an important role in the plant’s response to phosphorus and methods of addition, as the Baghdad variety was more efficient than the Babylon variety in utilizing the added phosphorus and converting it into vital building blocks such as nucleic acids and energy, which enhanced vital growth processes such as cell division and photosynthesis, increased the growth of different plant parts and the accumulation of dry matter and was reflected positively in grain yield rates (
Samreen and Kausar, 2019;
Saghfi et al., 2015).