Clump height
At harvest time, the plant height of the SI-ED treatment (47.2 cm) was significantly higher than that of the SI-RS treatment and FI-RS (Fig 2). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two irrigation methods (unpublished data). Spray irrigation and flood irrigation using
Eleocharis dulcismulch for higher plant height than rice straw mulch irrigation methods because the structure of the mulch material was more durable than straw mulch materials, helping the soil retain moisture well and avoid weeds. In comparison with ED mulch, rice straw mulch was applied and faster weed growth required higher costs for weed control. In addition, rice straw decomposed so fast that it must be applied 2-3 times per crop season, costed more, showed lower land coverage and moisture retention, reduced biodiversity and increased the risks of pests and diseases. Rice straw mulching quickly collapses and made the soil less ventilated than ED mulching (Fig 3).
Length of roots
Fig 2 showed that the root length of rakkyo in flood irrigation methods combined with
Eleocharis dulcismulching was significantly longer than those in SI-RS treatment. However, there was an insignificant difference in the root length of rakkyo in FI-RS and FI-ED. At harvest time, the root length of rakkyo in FI-ED treatment (10.5 cm) was significantly higher than that in SI-RS but insignificantly differed from the root length in other treatments. According to
Seifu et al., (2017), the mulch material retained moisture, maintained stable soil temperature and improved the development of garlic’s root system. Therefore, the FI-ED treatment could retain moisture and maintain stable soil temperature better than the rest treatments.
Number of bulbs/clump
The number of bulbs (stems) per clump at harvest time in the two straw-covered treatments was higher than in the other treatments (Fig 2). The number of bulbs (stems) per clump of rakkyo was consistent with the research results. According to the study of
Bah et al., (2012) on four large genera of the same family (Amaryllidaceae) grown in sandy soil, the average number of bulbs developed after eight months of planting ranged from 10 to 25 shoots per clump.
Number of leaves per bulb
The number of leaves per bulb in the two
Eleocharis dulciscovering treatments was higher than in the other two at harvest time (Fig 2). Because
Eleocharis dulciswas covered only 1 time, it made the rakkyo leaf grew more favorably than rice straw that had to be covered 2 times. When mulching for the 2
nd time, straw negatively affected leaf growth.
Weight of bulb
The average bulb weight in the SI-ED treatment was 4.38 g, higher than the two treatments of SI and FI combined with rice straw mulch (2.60 and 2.63 g, respectively) (Fig 4). There was no significant difference between the bulb weights (2.60-3.48 g bulb
-1) of SI-RS, FI-ED and FI-RS treatments. Thus, rakkyo cultivation using SI combined with
Eleocharis dulcismulching effectively increased average bulb weight compared to other treatments.
Vitamin C content
Fig 4 shows that the vitamin C content in rakkyo between different treatments was not significant. The average vitamin C content of 7.64 mg 100 g
-1, 3 times lower than the vitamin C content in 100 g of garlic (
Fahmi, 2019) and 4 times lower than in purple cabbage sprouts (Singh
et al., 2006).
Bulb yield
The spray irrigation method combined with
Eleocharis dulcismulching yielded 40.9 t ha
-1, 25.9% higher than the FI-ED of 32.5 t ha
-1 (Fig 5). The yield in the FI-RS treatment (30.0 t ha
-1) was 7.7% lower than in the FI-ED (32.5 t ha
-1). Similarly, the yield of rakkyo in SI-RS was 1.9% lower than in the control treatment. This showed that
Eleocharis dulcis mulching significantly increased rakkyo production. Similarly, with the same mulching material, the flood irrigation method yielded less than the spray irrigation method. This could be explained by the effectiveness of the mulching material (due to its durable structure, moisture, long use time, limited grass,
etc.). The rice straw that was used to mulch decomposed so fast during the rakkyo season that it generated conditions for weed growth and negatively affected productivity. Because the objective of the experiment was not disease evaluation, it was impossible to collect grass samples to see the yield difference of the experiments.
Financial efficiency
Table 1 indicates that the profit from growing the
Allium chinense was high (above 97 million VND ha
-1). Spray irrigation combined with water chestnut mulching for
Allium chinense helped increase yield significantly higher than the FI-RS, FI-ED and SI-ED for
Allium chinense. Flood irrigation methods combined with
Eleocharis dulcis mulching increased the profit up to 25.9% in comparison with the control treatment as well as the treatment of SI-RS also increased up to 8.0%. The profit of the treatment of SI-ED dramatically increased up to 119.5% in comparison with the control treatment.