Growth performances
Table 1 displays the study’s findings on average body weight and weight growth variations. Table 1 showed a significant difference (P<0.05) between the experimental and control group’s body weight on D14, D21, D28, D35 and D42. The experimental groups displayed considerably lower live weight values than the control group.
The average daily gains during [D14-D21] for the three groups were 51.37 g/d, 2.29 g/d and 19.2 g/d respectively, the BWG at [D21-D28] for the three groups were 68.29 g/d, 9.17 g/d and 38.29 g/d respectively, the BWG at [D28-D35] for the three groups were 87.43 g/d, 8.91 g/d and 57.57 g/d respectively, the BWG at [D35-D42] for the three groups were 72.43 g/d, 9.43 g/d and 21 g/d respectively.
Our results indicate that reducing the mineral and vitamin intake significantly affected the body weight and weight gain of the chickens (P<0.05) during the first period, which agrees with the findings of Jafari
Sayadi et al., (2005). Nutritional deficiencies can affect broiler chickens weight and weight gain by interfering with their ability to grow and develop their skeletons (
Ventura and Matias da Silva, 2019). A study by
Xu et al., (2021) showed that body weight and weight gain were affected by dietary calcium and phosphorus deficiency, causing a reduction in both parameters.
Low light had a significant impact on live weight and body weight gain of chickens (P<0.05); light limited birds consumed less food, which led to a reduction in body weight, consistent with the findings of
Lewis et al., (2009). Studies on restricted lighting consisting of long blocks of light and dark showed a decrease in body weight as the duration of darkness increased
(Renden et al., 1992). However,
Foss et al., (1972) found that birds housed in continuous darkness were able to gain weight almost as well as those under standard lighting systems. Low light conditions have been commonly used to increase body weight gain in chickens, but our results suggest that it may not be an effective strategy. To minimize the negative effects of low light,
Buyse et al., (1996) recommended including a short period of darkness to habituate birds to darkness and minimize panic during a power failure.
Femur weight
Table 2 illustrates the linear increase in bone weight with ageing. This finding is coherent with the previous research published by
Han et al., (2015), who stated that increase in bone weight was due to minerals retention and higher dietary intake.
Our study revealed that the femur weight was highest in control group and lowest in experimental group 1. Furthermore, our results indicated that chickens fed vitamin and mineral complex deficient diet had significantly lower femur weights (P<0.05) than the control group. The results are perfectly concordant with the study conducted by
Hakami et al., (2022) who demonstrated that broiler femur weight was strongly affected by reduced dietary intake. However, our results are directly opposed to those of
Williams et al., (2000b), who found that tibia bone weight tends to decrease with increasing dietary calcium content.
The chickens raised in total darkness had a significantly lower femur weight (P<0.05) than the control group. Our findings were consistent with the previous studies of
Van der Pol et al., (2015), who conducted a comparative study on the tibiotarsus and noted that weak light did not increase bone weight. Similarly, our results suggest that low light influences femur weight in broilers.
Weight and ash percentage
The results of this study exhibit a linear increase in bone ash weight with increasing age which correspond to the findings of
Han et al., (2015).
As demonstrated in Table 2, the experimental groups had considerably less bone ash weight and percentage than the control group (P<0.05).
Our results highlighted that broilers fed a diet deficient in vitamins and minerals complex had lower bone ash content than those fed a normal diet. According to research by
Hall et al., (2003), ash weight is a stronger indicator of bone mineralization than ash percentage, as non-mineralization parameters can affect the latter.
Our study also reported that broilers on a vitamins and minerals deficient diet had lower bone ash content than broilers receiving a normal diet. This finding supports the results of
Shi et al., (2022), who observed that reducing dietary Ca and P compromised growth and bone mineralization in broilers. Additionally, low dietary Ca and P have been reported to significantly reduce bone ash, with this study further supporting the idea that bone ash is more sensitive than growth performance to dietary Ca and P changes (
Wang and Kim, 2021).
Our findings indicate that the chickens in experimental group 2 (raised under continuous darkness) had lower bone ash than those in the control group. Furthermore,
Lewis et al., (2009) discovered that ash content increased logarithmically with photoperiod.
Bone length and diameter
The experimental groups of chickens showed shorter femur lengths and smaller diaphyseal diameters than the control group. Specifically, on D28, the femur lengths were 61.40mm, 31.82 mm and 52.34 mm for the control and experimental groups (1 and 2), respectively. On D35, the femur lengths were 71.46 mm, 40.62 mm and 61.80 mm for the control and experimental groups (1 and 2), respectively. On D42, the femur lengths were 72.42 mm, 42.06 mm and 62.36 mm for the control and experimental groups (1 and 2), respectively.
Table 2 indicate that bone length and diameter increased with age in broilers, consistent with the findings of
Han et al., (2015) who found that age influenced bone length and diameter. Our results showed that the bones of broilers chickens fed a diet deficient in vitamin and mineral complexes were significantly (P<0.05) shorter than those of the chickens in the control group, which was consistent with the findings of
Moreki et al., (2011). Moreover,
Williams et al., (2000a) reported that tibia and humerus length at all ages in chickens responded significantly to calcium intake. Meanwhile, bone width increased as chickens became heavier with age and
ad libitum feeding.
Our results also showed that the bones of chickens reared in total darkness were significantly (P<0.05) shorter than controls; similar reductions were revealed for femoral diaphysis diameters, which is also compatible with
Fidan et al., (2017).
Histomorphometric measurements
The results (Table 3) indicate that the experimental groups had a thinner and less dense femoral cortex compared to the control group (Fig 1).
Chickens that received a diet low in essential elements showed a reduction in cortical thickness and density compared to the control group, consistent with the findings of
Almeida Paz and Bruno, (2006) and
Bai et al., (2022). According to
Almeida Paz and Bruno, (2006), the thinning of the cortex may be attributed to the dietary calcium reduction.
Chickens in experimental group 2 exposed to low light showed a reduction in cortical thickness and density compared with the control group. However, this result conflicts with the study by
Kokolski et al., (2017), which showed that low light in fast-growing animals does not affect cortical thickness and tibial density.
We conclude that bone density is affected by a diet deficient in vitamins and mineral complexes and by darkness; our results were similar to the previous study done by
Kranioti et al., (2019) who demonstrated that bone density is affected by various factors, such as age, weight, diet, exercise and pathology.
Table 4 and Fig 2 illustrate that for the epiphyses at D28, D35 and D42, the chickens in experimental group 1 had a more extended proliferative zone than controls and a smaller hypertrophic zone than controls. Our data are similar to research performed by
Shao et al., (2019), who noted a significant increase in the tibial proliferative zone length for the Ca and P -deficient group (P<0.05), as well as significant reduction in the tibial hypertrophic zone length (P<0.05). A further study by
Li et al., (2022) suggested that dietary phosphorus deficiency affected tibial growth in goslings; the length of the proliferative zone was lower in the phosphorus-deficient group than in the control group, while the length of the hypertrophic zone was higher.
Chickens in experimental group 2 had higher lengths of both zones (proliferative and hypertrophic) compared to control chickens. This result agrees with
Kokolski et al., (2017), who demonstrated that photoperiod significantly impacted bone growth characteristics, including growth plate size. The research revealed a clear increase in proliferative and hypertrophic zones, as well as a considerable increase in overall growth plate width under short-day conditions. The researchers also concluded that the tibial bone volume and trabecular surface of short-day hamsters were much greater than those of long-day animals. The increase in total bone volume in short-day hamsters was mainly due to increased bone development rather than bone density.
We conclude that in fast-growing animals, the growth plate, particularly the proliferative and hypertrophic zone, is affected by various factors, such as diet and low light. Our results concur with findings of
Thompson (2007).