Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 44 issue 2 (april 2024) : 226-231

Study on Salinity Reduction and Changes in Chemical Properties in Saline Soil

Endang Dwi Purbajanti1,*, Florentina Kusmiyati1
1Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Diponegoro University, Jalan, Prof. Sudharto SH, Tembalang, 50275 Semarang, Indonesia.
Cite article:- Purbajanti Dwi Endang, Kusmiyati Florentina (2024). Study on Salinity Reduction and Changes in Chemical Properties in Saline Soil . Agricultural Science Digest. 44(2): 226-231. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-499.
Background: The aim of the work was to evaluate the effects of different treatments viz manure as organic amendments, gypsum as amendments and nitrogen resources on salinity of saline soil. 

Methods: The research was conducted using a 2×4×3 factorial design. The first factor was manure (non-manure and manure), the second factor was the addition of gypsum,  @ 0, 0.75, 1.5 and 3.0 ton ha-1) and third factor was source of nitrogen i.e. without N, nitrate and ammonium fertilizer. These three factors were repeated 3 times. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Duncan multiple range test for comparisons among means with a significance level of 5%. 

Result: This research markedly reduced pH, EC, Na and markedly increased sulfate, K content. But CEC, SAR, ESP, total N, nitrate, ammonium were not significant. The highest Ca content was in the 1.5 tons ha-1 gypsum treatment and non manure. Meanwhile, in the interaction between gypsum and N resources, the highest Mg content was 3 tons ha-1 of gypsum and nitrate.
Soil salinity is a common abiotic stress that changes the geographical distribution of plants. Salinity impacts are most serious in countries where all or most of the agricultural production is based on irrigation. As irrigated agriculture develops, more salinity problems will develop as there are millions of hectares of potentially irrigable land that could become salty (Kibria and Hoque, 2019). Saline soils are generally defined as saline soils having an exchangeable sodium percentage of less than 15 per cent and a sodium adsorption ratio of less than 13 per cent. Readings indicating saline soils include an electrical conductivity result greater than 4 ds m-1 and a pH level of less than 8.5. Sodic soils must have an electrical conductivity reading of less than 4 ds m-1, similar to normal soils. However, other results will be abnormal. The results will show a percentage of exchangeable sodium greater than 15 per cent and a sodium adsorption ratio greater than 13 per cent. The soil will also have poor structure and will be very alkaline with a pH reading of 8.5 or more (Shrivastava and Kumar 2015; Lingappa and Kuligod 2017; Purbajanti et al., 2019). Moreover, saline water is used for irrigation in some regions, which increases the salt contents in topsoil. In this regard, gypsum has been reported several times to maintain optimal K+/Na+ and Ca2+/Na+ ratios, lower pH and provide plants with nutrient sulphur (S) needed in saline soils (Ahmed et al., 2016). Through the administration of S, gypsum increases plant tolerance and resistance to biotic and abiotic stress factors by assisting protein synthesis, compounds containing chlorophyll and increasing P and N uptake. In addition, the combined use of organic matter (e.g., compost and manure) as a bio-organic amendment with gypsum has great potential in improving saline soils (Bello et al., 2021).
              
The aim of the work was to evaluate the effects of different manure as organic amendments, gypsum as amendments and nitrogen resources on soil salinity of saline soil. The information obtained from this study will help provide guidance on the selection of manure as organic amendments, gypsum as amendments and nitrogen resources in ameliorating coastal saline soil while considering their environmental concerns.
Location and soil sampling
 
The study was conducted in April-September 2017 in saline soil, Jepara, Central Java, Indonesia. The land is planted with forage namely Panicum maxium. Plain with 0-25 m elevation, located on 110°5'-110°6' of East Longitude and between 5°43'-6°47' South Latitude. The research was conducted using a 2×4×3 factorial design. The first factor was manure (non-manure and manure), the second factor was the addition of gypsum, namely without gypsum, gypsum @ 0.75 ton ha-1, gypsum @ 1.5 ton ha-1 and gypsum @ 3 tons ha-1, after the application is irrigated. The third factor is the source of N, namely without N, nitrate source (KNO3) and ammonium source (NH4)2 SO4. These three factors were repeated 3 times.
 
Data collection and collection procedures
 
The results of the initial soil analysis (before treatment) are as follows; 49.5% clay (below 0.002 mm), 31.68% silt (0.02- 0.002 mm) and 19.17% sand (2.00-0.02 mm) which belonged to the clayey texture class. The pH value of the experimental soil was 8.3, which was high. Very high electrical conductivity (19.6 mmhos cm-1), organic matter is 3.0%, low total N (0.12%), low Cl (13.3 ppm), low SO4 (0.2 ppm), low available K (0.33 Cmol (p+) kg-1), available Ca is very low [1.81  Cmol (p+) kg-1], CEC is high [28.2 cmol (p+] kg-1), available Na is very high (2.08 Cmol (p+) kg-1), available Mg is low (0.49 Cmol (p+) kg-1). The SAR and ESP values   were calculated based on formula given in (Abdel-Fattah, 2012). the experimental soil had a SAR value of 1.9 and an ESP of 7.4. The research variables were texture (wet sieve method), acidity (1:5) (pH meter), EC (1:5, conductometer), Organic meter (Walkey and Black), total Nitrogen (Kjeldahl), NO3 (Morgan Wolf, Spectrophotometer), NH4 (Morgan Wolf, Spectrophotometer),  CEC (ammonium acetate, Kjeldahl), Na, Ca, Mg, K (ammonium acetate, AAS), anions (Na acetate).

Data analysis
 
Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Duncan multiple range test (Dong, 2012) for comparisons among means with a significance level of 5%.
Soil Physico-chemical properties
 
The highest EC in the control was 19.6 mmhos cm-1 and the lowest EC (5.4 mmhos cm-1) was achieved by the application of manure @20 ton ha-1 gypsum @ 3 ton ha-1 ammonium (Table 1). Based on the above reaction Ca++ will expel Na+ which then Na2SO4 and other soluble salts is leached during regularly wasting so that there is a decrease in Na which is then able to reduce soil EC. The amount of dissolved salt depends on the relative amount of soil and water used so various interpretations of the EC value arise because the effect of salinity changes depending on various factors such as irrigation water, soil texture, salt type, plant growth status, drainage and climate (Tan and Thanh 2021).
 

Table 1: Manure, gypsum and nitrogen sources on physiochemical properties of soils.


       
The application of manure together with gypsum allows a decrease in pH because the manure contains organic acids that provide H + ions into the soil and gypsum contains sulfate ions so that it can lower the soil pH. Sulfate ion functions as an anion that can lower soil pH. The decrease in soil pH due to gypsum application is in accordance with Bello et al., (2021) that gypsum is used to neutralize soil with a high sodium and/or salt content so that it can reduce soil pH. Shehzad et al., (2020) described that continuously adding farmyard manure to saline soil results in a reduction of soil pH and enhancement in carbon content along with exchange capacity of replaceable cations. The results of the study are in accordance with Abdel-Fattah (2012) who reported that gypsum was used for sodic soil amendment and reclamation of salt irrigated soil structures by reducing CO32- and OH-. According to Dong, (2012) there was a change in soil fertility in saline soils that underwent reclamation (improvement), namely soil fertility was getting better, a decrease in salinity and changes in groundwater salinity.
    
The application of Manure, gypsum and nitrogen fertilizers in the form of ammonium or nitrate did not significantly reduce the SAR values. Based on Sabareshwari and Ramya. (2018): Yuvaraj et al., 2021), SAR is used to estimate water quality, namely the concentration of Na, Ca and Mg ions in one liter of solution. According to Brusseau et al., (2019)  if the SAR value is less than 10, this means that the water can be used for irrigation because it has low sodium content. The application of manure, gypsum and nitrogen fertilizers in the form of ammonium or nitrate did not significantly influence the ESP values. Factors that affect the dissolution of gypsum are soil solution, temperature, water flow, gypsum grain size and soil Na saturation (Singh, 2016).
 
Total N, Nitrate, ammonium and sulfate soil content
 
Based on Table 2, it is known that the application of 20 tons. ha-1 manure, gypsum and nitrogen source  was not significant effect on total soil N. The application of 20 tons. ha-1 manure, gypsum and nitrogen source  statistically was not significant effect on soil nitrate. Soil ammonium content was not significant effect with applied manure, gypsum and nitrogen source. Organic fertilizers with disadvantages such as low nutrient content, slow decomposition and varied nutrient composition have many benefits including balanced nutrient supply, increased nutrient availability, increased microbial activity, decomposition of toxic elements, improved soil structure and availability of groundwater (Bhuyan et al., 2021).
 

Table 2: Content of soil nitrogen, nitrate, ammonium and sulfate.


       
The nitrogen sources in the form of nitrate and ammonium increased the sulfate content of the soil compared to those without nitrogen but the nitrogen form gave the same effect (Table 2). The highest soil sulfate content was in the treatment combination between manure-gypsum 3 tons ha-1 and ammonium (44.5 ppm) and the lowest was in the treatment combination without manure, without gypsum and without nitrogen (0.20 ppm). The increase in the sulfate content of the soil was due to the addition of element sulphur (S) derived from manure and the decomposition of gypsum applied to the soil. Based on Sajal and Nasrin (2020). there was a change in soil fertility in saline soils that underwent reclamation (improvement), namely soil fertility was getting better, a decrease in salinity and changes in groundwater saline. Both ammonium and  nitrate form  can be utilized by plants (Zhu et al., 2020).
 
Soil potassium, sodium, calcium and magnesium content
 
The research results of Saleque et al., (2010) in saline soils, the exchangeable potassium content at Munshiganj, Ashasuni and Patharghata was in the range of 0.94-2.49, 0.32-0.53 and 0.25-0.30 cmol.kg-1.
       
The K content is affected by the interaction between manure, gypsum and N sources (Fig 1a and Fig 1b). In non-manure, N sources, both nitrate, ammonium and non-N, show an increase in K content, as well as the use of manure has the same pattern, where the highest is in 3 tons ha-1 gypsum, nitrate in both non-manure or with the addition of manure. available nitrogen (kg ha-1), phosphorus (kg ha-1) and potassium (kg ha-1) may be due to an increase in levels of organic and inorganic fertilizers (Meena et al., 2016).
 

Fig 1: Effect of manure, gypsum and N resources on soil potassium content.


       
The resulting Na content is affected by the interaction between manure and gypsum (Fig 2a), also affected by the interaction between gypsum and N sources. In Fig 2a. It can be seen that the lowest yields were gypsum 3 tons ha-1 and manure 3 tons ha-1 which were significantly different from all treatments. In Fig 2b, the lowest yield is seen in gypsum 1.5 ton ha-1 and nitrate. One of the deleterious effects of high salinity stress is manifested as nutrient imbalances like high soil Na+ concentrations reduce the amounts of available K+, Mg++ and Ca++ for plants resulting in Na+ toxicity on one hand and deficiencies of essential cations on the other (Soni et al., 2022).
 

Fig 2: Content of Na in the soil: (a) effect of manure and gypsum (b) effect of gypsum and N resources.


       
Soil Ca content due to the interaction of manure and gypsum is presented in Fig 3a. Meanwhile, the soil Ca content due to the interaction of gypsum and N sources is presented in Fig 3b. The highest Ca content was in the 1.5 tons ha-1 gypsum treatment and non manure. As for the interaction between gypsum and N sources, the highest Ca value was in the gypsum and non-N treatment. This could be due to an increase in the level of applied gypsum as well as Ca2+, a replacement of the soil exchange complex that produces Na+, which is triggered by leaching of salt away from the root zone. (Rana et al., 2018). In order to understand these mechanisms, researchers have focused on ion accumulations and transfers, especially Na+, K+ and Ca2+ that appear in plant organelles under salt stress (Gulmezoglu et al., 2016).
 

Fig 3: soil calcium content: (a) effect of application manure and gypsum (b) effect of application gypsum and N resources.


     
The Mg content of soil due to the influence of manure and gypsum can be seen in Fig 4a and due to the influence of gypsum and N resources can be seen in FIg 4b. the highest Mg content was in non manure and 1.5 tons ha-1 gypsum administration. Meanwhile, in the interaction between gypsum and N resources, the highest Mg content was 3 tons ha-1 of gypsum and nitrate. This is in accordance with Rana et al., (2018) that Gypsum has proven to be an economical and better amendment for saline-sodic soil reclamation due to its universal availability, low cost and luxurious supply of Ca2+. Higher than permissible NO3- levels in leachate recorded with the application of gypsum accompanied by N above the recommended level. This may be because the application of gypsum increases soil permeability and reduces deflocculation, thereby increasing the percolation of water carrying dissolved NO3.
 

Fig 4: Soil magnesium content: (a) effect of application manure and gypsum(b) effect of application gypsum and N resources.

This research markedly reduced pH, EC, Na and markedly increased sulfate. But CEC, SAR, ESP, total N, nitrate, ammonium were not significant. The highest K content is nitrate in gypsum 3 tons ha-1 for both non-manure and manure. The highest Ca content was in the 1.5 tons ha-1 gypsum treatment and non manure. Meanwhile, in the interaction between gypsum and N resources, the highest Mg content was 3 tons ha-1 of gypsum and nitrate.
 
The authors are thankful to the Dean of Animal and Agricultural Sciences Faculty for the research facility.
 
The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

  1. Ahmed, K., Qadir, G., Jami, A.R., Saqib, A.I., Nawaz, M.Q., Kamal, M.A., Haq, E. (2016). Strategies for Soil Amelioration Using Sulphur in Salt Affected Soils. Cercet. Agron. Mold. 49: 5-16.

  2. Abdel-Fattah, M.K. (2012).Role of gypsum and compost in reclaiming saline-sodic soils. OSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS). PP: 30-38

  3. Bello, S.K., Alayafi, A.H., AL-Solaimani, S.G., Abo-Elyousr, K.A.M. (2021). Mitigating Soil Salinity Stress with Gypsum and Bio-Organic Amendments: A Review. Agronomy. 11(9): 1735. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11091735.

  4. Brusseau, M.I., Pepper, I.L. and Gerba, C.P.  (2019). Environmental and Pollution Science, Third Edition. Elsevier inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-00480-9.

  5. Bhuyan, B.K., Thakur, C.L., Sharma, H. and Kumar, D. (2021). Influence of organic manures on soil physicochemical properties under morus based agrisilviculture system. Agricultural Science Digest. 41(4): 584-589. doi: 10.188 05/ag.D-5202.

  6. Dong, H. (2012). Technology and field management for controlling soil salinity effects on cotton. AJCS. 6(2): 333-341.

  7. Gulmezoglu, N., Aydogan, C. and Turhan, E. (2016). Physiological, biochemical and mineral dimensions of green bean genotypes depending on Zn priming and salinity. Legume Research. 39(5): 713-721. Print ISSN:0250-5371.  doi: 10.1 8805/lr.v0iOF.3543.

  8. Kibria, M.G. and Hoque, M.A. (2019). Review on plant responses to soil salinity and amelioration strategies. Open Journal of Soil Science. 09(11): 219-231. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2019.911013.

  9. Lingappa, M. and Kuligod, V.B. (2017). Characterization of soil of Gathaprabha left bank canal command area of north Karnataka for salinity and sodicity. Indian J. Agric. Res. 51(1): 82-85. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v51i1.7066.

  10. Meena, S., Swaroop, N. and Dawson, J. (2016). Effect of integrated nutrient management on physical and chemical properties of soil. Agric. Sci. Digest. 36(1): 56-5. doi: 10.18805/ asd.v35i1.9312.

  11. Purbajanti, E.D.,  Adinurani, P.G., Turkadze, T., Vincçvièa-Gaile, Z. and Setyobudi, R.H. (2019). Effectiveness the source of nitrogen from NO3 and NH4 for Panicum maximum Jacq. growth in saline soil. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 293: 012015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/293/1/012015.

  12. Rana, M.S., Murtaza, A.G.,   Sun, X., Imran,  M., Afzal, J., Elyamine, A.M., Farag, M.A.,  Riaz, M., Waris, M.I. and Hu, C. (2018). Nitrate leaching losses reduction, N-use efficiency optimization in Triticum aestivum L. and Oryza sativa L.  rotation to  improve  production  and  soil reclamation rate with gypsum in salt-affected soil. Indian J. Agric. Res. 52(6): 604-611.  DOI: 10.18805/IJARe.A-350.

  13. Sabareshwari, V. and A. Ramya. (2018). Coastal saline soils of India: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 39(1): 86-88. doi: 10.18805/ag.R-1768.

  14. Sajal, R. and Nasrin, C. (2020). Effects of leaching on the reclamation of saline soils as affected by different organic and inorganic amendments. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development. 3(2): 329-354. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7454/jessd.v3i2.1075.

  15. Saleque, M.A., Uddin, M.K., Salam, M.A., Ismail, A.M. and Haefele,  S.M. (2010). Soil Characteristics of Saline and Non-saline Deltas of Bangladesh. Tropical Deltas and Coastal Zones: [(eds) Hoanh, C.T. et al.)]. Food Production. Communities and Environment at the Land-Water Interface. 144-153.  

  16. Shehzad, I., Sarwar, G., Manzoor, M.Z., Zafar, A., Muhammad, S. and Murtaza, G. (2020). Effect of saline water irrigation on chemical properties and fertility status of soil. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research. 33(3): 527-534.

  17. Shrivastava, P.,  Kumar, R. (2015). Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 22: 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001.

  18. Singh, Y.P., Singh, R., Sharma, D.K., Mishra, V.K. and Arora, S. (2016). Optimizing gypsum levels for amelioration of sodic soils to enhance grain yield and quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 64(1): 33-40. doi: 10.5958/0974-0228.2016.00005.0. 

  19. Soni, S., Sehrawat, N., Kumar, N., Lata, C., Kumar, A. and Mann, A. (2022). Varietal variation in physiological and biochemical traits of durum wheat genotypes under salinity stress. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 56(3): 262-267. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5559.

  20. Tan, L.V. and Thanh, T. (2021). The effects of salinity on changes in characteristics of soils collected in a saline region of the Mekong Delta. Vietnam. Open Chemistry. 19: 471- 480. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2021-0037.

  21. Yuvaraj, M., Bose, K.S.C., Elavarasi, P. and Tawfik, E. (2021). Soil Salinity and Its Management in Soil Moisture Importance. intechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93329

  22. Zhu, G., Wang, Y., Shi, X., Lu, H., Ren, Z., Shi, Y., Jiao, X.,  Ibrahim, M.E.H., Irshad, A., Zhu, W., Bian, J. and Zhou, G. (2020). Optimum nitrogen management enhances growth. antioxidant ability and yield performance of rice in saline soil of coastal area of China. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research. 80(4): October-December 2020: 629-639. doi:10.4067/S0718-58392020000400629.

Editorial Board

View all (0)