Physiological response
There was a highly significant effect (P<0.000) of the LED treatments on assimilation rate. In comparison to both combinations of (5:1R: B450 nm and 2.5: 1 R: B 450 nm), the (white and 2.5:1 R/B 435nm) LED treatments gave the highest assimilation rate, (Fig 2A). The white LED treatment increased assimilation rate by 33% and the 2.5:1 R:B 435 nm treatment increased assimilation rate by 41% compared to both of the of R:B 450 nm treatments used.
As with assimilation rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate highly significant differed (P<0.000) between LED treatments (Fig 2B and C). White + (2.5:1 R/B 435 nm) LED treatments promoted the highest stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, compared to the different ratio of R: B 450 nm used.
Morphology response
Different LED combinations led to a significant difference in plant morphology (Table 1). Plants were tallest under 5:1 R/B 450 nm and followed by white and 2.5:1 R/B 450 nm and the smallest plants were under 2.5:1 R/B435 nm. The highest values for leaf and branch number were obtained from the 5:1 R/B 450 nm LEDs followed by the 2.5:1 R/B 435 nm treatment (Table 1). The greatest shoot fresh (P<0.000) and dry weight (P= 0.003) and leaf area (P= 0.004) were obtained by plants under both white and the 2.5: 1R/B 435 nm (Fig 3) and the smallest shoot fresh and dry weight and leaf area were produced by plants under 2.5:1 R:B 450 nm which was no significantly differ from 5:1 R:B 450 nm. Both white and 2.5:1 R: B 435 nm LED increased the shoot fresh weight approximately by 33% compared to 2.5:1 R: B 450 nm. While, white LED was increased the plant shoot dry weight by 87% as compared to (5:1R/B 450 nm) and 2.5:1 R/B 450 nm), respectively, although 2.5:1 R: B 435 nm LED increased the plant shoot dry weight approximately by 21 and 79% as compared to 5:1 R/B 450 nm and 2.5:1 R/B 450 nm) respectively. As shown in (Fig 4) White LED increased plant leaf area by 32 and 45% as compared to both different ratio of R: B 450 nm and the biggest leaf area was produced by plants under 2.5: 1 R:B 435nm which increased leaf area by 29 and 41% as compared to both different ratio of R:B 450 nm.
Essential oil content
There was a significant (P = 0.003) effect of LED treatment on plant essential oil content (Fig 5), the highest amounts of plant shoot essential oil content were obtained from plants under white, 2.5: 1 R:B 450 nm and 2.5 R:B 435 nm LEDs, increasing the essential oil content approximately by 20% compared to 5:1 R: B 450.
This study clearly confirmed that different LED array combinations of red, with a wavelength peak at 663 nm and blue light (with peaks of 450 and 435 nm) can differentially affect the growth, physiology and essential oil content in lemon balm. All LED treatments were capable of growing acceptable crops of Lemon Balm, but despite identical PPFD (light energy supplied to the crops) growth and yield were influenced by specific combinations of LED wavelengths. In general, a combination of red and blue has been proved to be effective in driving assimilation rate
(Hernandez and Kubota, 2014,
Hogewoning et al., 2010, Wang et al., 2016) with a higher proportion of red to blue light often promoting plant assimilation rate and growth
(Wang et al., 2018). However, there are discrepancies for different plants in response to the blue wavelength accompanying the red. Using a higher proportion of blue to red light (60% blue to 40% red compared with 20% blue to 80% red) had a positive impact on stomatal functioning in sweet basil
(Jensen et al., 2018). A blue deficient light treatment resulted in acclimation of light energy portioning in PSII and CO
2 assimilation rate in other plant species such as spinach
(Matsuda et al., 2008).
In the current study, the physiological measurements in lemon balm indicated that net assimilation rate and stomatal conductance were more productive under the white and 2.5:1 R: B 435nm, markedly increasing all physiological parameters measured compared to other LEDs. This is supported by a recent study on another of the Lamiaceae (sweet basil) where the combination of blue (435nm) to red (663 nm) light promoted the highest assimilation rate and stomatal conductance subsequently leading to 20% enhanced growth of sweet basil compared to blue light at 450 nm
(Rihan et al., 2020). The favourable response to white light was interesting and in other studies significant increases in assimilation rate under white LED has been related to the inclusion of green wavebands. It has found that green LED might enhance photosynthesis more efficiently than red light when supplied in a white background LEDs
(Terashima et al., 2009).
Alongside physiological parameters, the lemon balm shoot fresh and dry weights and leaf area were comparatively greater in plants grown under the combination of 2.5: 1 R/B 435 (Fig 3A,B and 4). This indicates that the increased assimilation rate and leaf area under white and the 2.5:1 R/B435nm resulted in increased fresh and dry biomass compared to other LEDs. However, lemon balm leaf and branch number showed no significant differences among all LED treatments (Table 1) indicating that plant development was not affected by the LED spectra. In a similar study LEDs treatments significantly increased the shoot fresh and dry weight and also increased the Leaf number in two genotypes (IIam and Isfahan) compared to greenhouse condition and compared to other LEDs treatments (white 380 to 760 nm , red and blue) the combination of (70:30 R 650 nm:B 460 nm) with a light intensity of 300 µ mol. m
-2 with a 16 h illumination and 8 h darkness and 25± 2
0C produced the tallest lemon balm in both genotypes shoot fresh, shoot dry weight and leaf number
(Tayebeh et al., 2021). In their work the white LED was not significant as the combination of red and blue on the both of lemon balm genotypes that might be due to the inclusion the different light wavelengths such as far-red in the white LED with a higher light intensity which were different from the white LED used in current experiment. These results agree with those reported by
Naznin et al., (2019) who found that the combination of red 661 nm to blue 449 nm with a ratio of 91% R : 9% blue at the light intensity of 200 ± 5 µ molm
-2s
-1 had a positive influence on basil (
Ocimum basilicum) plant height, leaf number, fresh weight and dry weight compared to 83%R : 17 %B, 95% R: 5% B and 100% R
(Naznin et al., 2019). In addition, The elongation of the main and lateral shoots in maxican mint were significantly increased under red 660 nm LEDs at a light intensity of 100 µmol. m
-2 s
-1 compared to monochromatic blue 470 nm and green 525 nm and the a combined white, blue and green. Whilst the mint fresh weight was significantly increased under blue compared to other LEDs used. (Noguchi and Amaki, 2016). It has been well documented that R LED resulted in plant elongation and biomass reduction
(Lin et al., 2013) and B LED is important for expansion and biomass production
(Johkan et al., 2012).
In the current study, as shown in (Fig 5) the lemon balm shoot essential; oil content had significantly increased under white and the combination of 2.6:1 R: B 450nm and 2.5:1 R: B 435 nm treatments increasing the essential oil content by about 20 % compared to 5:1 R: B450 nm treatment. This result indicates that for the oil composition blue light in the range from 435 to 450 nm is as important as red light. This impact on the level of essential oil in other Lamiaceae family species has also been reported elsewhere
(Ichimura et al., 2009). Their work with sweet basil revealed that the essential oil content of basil grown under blue light was between 1.4 to 4.4 fold higher than those grown without blue light.
The essential oil in maxican mint (
Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour) was also higher under blue light compared to monochromatic green and red LEDs at the light intensity of 100 µ molm
-2 s
-1 (
Noguchi and Amaki, 2016). Moreover, the addition of 30% of blue light to 70% red light increased the essential oil of three cultivated of mint species
Mentha piperita, Mentha spicata longifolia, compared to 100:100 white
(Sabzalian et al., 2014). However, compared to the glasshouse condition the amount of essential oil content of two genotypes (IIam and Isfahan) of
M .officinalis was not significantly affected by different LEDs light sources (white, blue, red, blue +blue LEDs ) with light intensity of 300 µ mol. m
-2 with a 16 h illumination and 8 h darkness and 25± 2
oC but the composition of essential oil was variable under different LED treatments and the total amount of components in IIam genotype was higher than Isfahan genotype
(Tayebeh et al., 2021). Previously well documented that Blue light has been enhanced the biosynthesis of the chemical composition of several plant species
(Hoffmann et al., 2015, Ichimura et al., 2009).
In general, the results from the current study are supportive of the positive finding by
Rihan et al., (2020) that using 435 nm blue light spectrum is better in comparison with the commercially widely used 450 nm LED spectrum when supplied in combination with 663 nm red light).