Extraction yield
According to the results presented in Table 1, all 3 apple varieties presented high yields for both juice and vinegar. This may be due to the juice extraction method (fresh squeezing method) which was reported by
Wang et al., (2020) as the best method compared to the two other methods (spiral juice method and broken juice method). Our results showed higher rates than those reported by
Mounir et al., (2018) with 0.68 l/kg as a yield rate. On one hand, this could be explained by the use of a stainless steel electric crusher for crushing fresh apples and then pressing them of using a manual press with steel grids and this process can affect the yield rate. On the other hand; the maturity of the apples used in their study because mature apples give lower yields due to the difficulty of the extraction procedure (
Guiné et al., 2021).
We have found that
Starkrimson variety exhibited the highest yield of juice and vinegar, followed by
Royal gala and
Golden delicious varieties.
Mounir et al., (2018) used the variety
Golden delicious in their study and reported a low yield.
Physico chemical properties of apple vinegars
The evolution of the fermentation for the 03 apple juices (
Starkrimson juice,
Royal gala juice and
Golden delicious juice) was monitored by measuring the physico-chemical parameters (pH, acidity, TSS) for more than 8 weeks and the color of fresh apple juice and apple cider vinegar, in order to determine the difference between these three organic vinegars. A close perusal of data presented in Fig 6, 7 and 8 exhibited significant variations in fruit physico-chemical characteristics of different apple varieties.
a. Comparison of the 03 apple juices TSS values during their fermentation
The Brix value refers to the total solubility content in vinegar. It is also an indicator for the total sugar amount in the sample based on the total soluble solid (TSS)
(Jamaludin et al., 2017). Fig 6 showed a decrease in the total sugar levels of the three apple juices during alcoholic fermentation (15.6
o to 8.58, 13.6 to 4.48 and 12.2 to 4.14 for
Starkrimson,
Royal Gala and
Golden delicious juices respectively, with a significant difference in TSS for all of them (p = 0.000). The
Starkrimson variety recorded the highest TSS the while the lowest TSS was recorded in the
Golden delicious variety.
Kishor et al., (2017) reported that these appreciable differences in TSS values between different apple varieties could be explained on the basis of genetic differences with respect to the various genotypes, which can affect their synthesis
via photosynthesis and also their subsequent breakdown into simple metabolites.
Bongers et al., (1994) and
Joshi et al., (2018) reported the same TSS rate for the
Golden delicious variety. In contrast;
Tian et al., (2018) gave a higher TSS corresponding to 13.11.
b. Comparison of the percentage of obtained acetic acid of the three apple juices during their fermentation
Acetic acid production increased during t3 for all apple juices (Fig 7) and reached its maximum value at the end of acetic fermentation (t13). The results showed a significant variation in acetic acid content for the three studied vinegars (p=0.032), where 7.26% for
Starkrimson vinegar, 7.18% for
Royal gala vinegar and 6.30% for
Golden delicious vinegar. Our results are consistent with those of
Martín et al., (2017) and
Mahamuni et al., (2020) who reported that the concentration of acetic acid varied from 5% to 20% (w/v) in vinegars produced from other alcoholic bases than wine and also with those of
Dabija et al., (2014) who reported a level of 3.9 to 9%.
c. Comparison of the pH values of the three apple juices during their fermentation
The pH value indicates a measure of acid strength in food, thus the lower pH value shows the higher acidity
(Jamaludin et al., 2017).
Our monitoring showed that the pH level decreases over time for the studied apple juices. For the
Starkrimson variety, its apple juice showed an important pH decrease (4.68 to 3.16). But for the other varieties, this decrease was less:
Royal gala apple cider vinegar (4.42 to 3.29) and
Golden delicious apple cider vinegar (4.33 to 3.26) (Fig 8).
The differences in the acidity level of the fruits are attributed to the presence of varying amounts of organic acids in these fruits. The obtained values agreed with
Selvanathan et al., (2020) who reported an acidity value of 3.12% and
Wilczynski et al., (2019) reported acidity values between 3.37 and 4.24. The kruskal-wallis test showed a significant difference in values of the 03 varieties (p=0.032).
As can be seen in Fig 10, the total acidity of
Royal gala apple cider vinegar was the lowest of all because it has the highest pH value (pH is inversely proportional to its total acid content). In the study of
Joshi et al., (2018), the pH ranged from 3.35 to 3.62 for the
Golden delicious variety which is in agreement with our results (3.26).
Color
The color of the three samples changed from brown to light yellow (Fig 9). This is due to the variation of physico-chemical parameters (Table 2), probably the increase of the acetic acid concentration, which favors the sedimentation of fibers (pectin) andexplains the regularity, the light yellow color and the brightness of the obtained vinegars. Also, the decrease in the sugar rate consequently decreases the enzymatic browning reactions (
Nizar, 2009).
The correlation test for of the
Starkrimson variety parameters showed that the “L and b” values are not correlated with the physico-chemical parameters while the “a” value is positively correlated “1” with the acidity and negatively correlated”-1" with TSS and pH. L, a and b values of the
Royal gala variety, are positively correlated with TSS and pH “1” and negatively correlated with acidity “-1”. Finally, for the
Golden delicious variety, L and b parameters are negatively correlated with TSS and pH “1” and positively correlated with acidity “-1”, however; the “a” parameter is positively correlated with TSS and pH “1” and negatively correlated with acidity “-1”.
Sensory analysis
The sensory analysis was performed by 70 participants, for the three obtained vinegars by fermentation of the juice of three apple varieties (VGD, VRG and VSK) and the two commercial vinegars (VNC and VPC), using the hedonic test, to assess their acceptances and preferences. It allowed us to classify the vinegars by calculating the average grade for the five assigned vinegars. The VGD vinegar rated 7.01 moderately pleasant, the (VNC, VSK and VRG) vinegars rated 6.47, 6.54 and 6.56 respectively as slightly pleasant and the VPC vinegar 5.23 neutral (Fig 10).
The average rating for each attribute allowed us to classify the vinegars as follows; (VNC, VGD, VRG and VSK) very pleasant for the color, (VGD, VRG and VSK) moderately pleasant for the shine, (VNC, VGD, VRG and VSK) very pleasant for the regularity, VSK very pleasant for sweet taste, (VNC and VGD) very pleasant for acid taste and (VPC, VGD and VSK) moderately pleasant for flavor. All vinegars have a slightly pleasant smell and no salty or bitter taste was noticeable (neutral). There is a significant difference (p=0.000) between the 3 vinegars where the VGD was evaluated as the best one on all levels.
(VNC) commercial unflavored vinegar, (VPC) commercial apple vinegar, (VGD)
Golden delicious apple cider vinegar, (VRG)
Royal gala apple cider vinegar, (VSK)
Starkrimson apple cider vinegar.