Biology, Morphometric Characteristics and Life Table Parameters of the Okra Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under Laboratory Conditions

R
R. Athira1
L
L. Ramazeame1,*
R
R. Nisha1
D
D. Kannan2
S
S. Karthik1
1Department of Entomology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Horticulture, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: In a controlled laboratory environment, the morphometric characters, developmental biology, fecundity, sex ratio and life table of the okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius), were studied. The insect exhibited four larval instars showing geometric growth in accordance with Dyar’s law.

Methods: A cohort of 100 freshly deposited eggs was used to conduct life table analysis under laboratory conditions at 25±2oC and 70 ± 10% RH. Age-specific and stage-specific life table parameters were computed. Morphometric characters of all life stages were recorded using a Leica stereomicroscope. Fecundity, sex ratio, developmental durations and survivorship were also recorded.

Results: The incubation period ranged from 1 to 5 days (3.30±1.26 days), while the total larval duration ranged from 4 to 14 days (8.63±1.89 days). The pupal period lasted 7 to 9 days (7.82±0.79 days). Adult longevity varied from 7 to 16 days in females and 6 to 14 days in males. Fecundity ranged from 146 to 181 eggs per female (161.5±24.91) and egg hatchability was 73.45±4.35%. The sex ratio (male: female) was 1:1.04. Life table analysis revealed higher mortality during egg and early larval stages. K-value analysis confirmed that early developmental stages contributed the most to generation mortality. These findings are providing essential baseline data for better integrated pest management of Earias vittella (F.) on okra.

Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] is an important vegetable grown extensively in tropical and subtropical regions of the world because of its nutritional as well as economic importance. The crop is considered to be rich in dietary fiber, vitamins and minerals, playing a significant role in human nutrition (Chandra et al., 2016). Okra is grown extensively in different agro-climatic regions of India, but its productivity is adversely affected by various biotic constraints, including insect pests (Sheoran et al., 2023; Kulhari et al., 2024). Among the insect pests infesting okra, the shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is considered one of the most destructive species (Gautam et al., 2013). The larvae bore into tender shoots, flower buds and fruits, resulting in wilting, premature dropping of flowers and fruits and rendering the produce unmarketable (Shrivastava et al., 2017). Yield losses caused by Earias vittella (F.) vary depending on crop stage and severity of infestation (Ounis et al., 2024). Due to its concealed feeding habit within plant tissues, management of this pest becomes difficult and often leads to repeated application of chemical insecticides, resulting in resistance development, environmental contamination and disruption of natural enemy complexes (Shah et al., 2012; Gautam et al., 2014).
       
Understanding the biological attributes and population dynamics of insect pests is essential for designing effective and sustainable management strategies (Southwood and Henderson, 2000; Srinivasan, 2006; Ounis et al., 2024). Life table analysis is a well-established ecological tool that provides quantitative information on survival, mortality and reproductive potential of insect populations (Birch, 1948; Howe, 1953; Carey, 1993; Chi et al., 2020).  Age-specific and stage-specific life tables help identify key mortality factors and vulnerable life stages, thereby facilitating appropriate timing of control measures (Chi et al., 2020). The developmental period, survivorship and reproductive capacity of Earias vittella (F.) might differ depending on various environmental factors, quality of the host plant and geographical location (Shah et al., 2012). Thus, it is important to establish baseline data on the life history parameters of the species under specific conditions in order to properly predict the population dynamics of the species.

In view of the above, the present investigation was carried out to evaluate the morphometric studies, developmental biology, fecundity and survivorship of Earias vittella (F.) under controlled conditions by using life table techniques.
Insect culture and rearing
 
The experiment was carried out under controlled laboratory conditions from September 2024 to February 2025 at the Department of Entomology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences. Larvae of Earias vittella (F.) were obtained from okra fields to start a laboratory culture. The insects were reared on fresh okra fruits and tender shoots in a laboratory setting of 25±2°C; 70±10% RH. To ensure reliable observations, larvae were kept individually in clean plastic containers. Fresh okra fruits were given every day till pupation. Pupae were moved to separate pots for adult emergence.
       
Newly emerged adults were paired and maintained in oviposition cages made of glass jars covered with muslin cloth. Cotton swabs soaked in 5% sugar solution were provided as food. Fresh okra twigs with tender leaves and fruits were placed inside the cage as oviposition substrate. Eggs laid on the substrate were collected daily and used for biological and life table studies.
 
Morphometric observations
 
Morphometrics of eggs, larval instars, pupae and adults were recorded with a Leica stereomicroscope. Length and breadth (mm) were measured for all stages; in adults, wingspan, antennal length and body length were taken. Head capsule width was measured for each larval instar. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
 
Biological parameters
 
The durations of each life stage were observed, encompassing the egg stage, larval instars, pre-pupal stage, pupal phase and adult lifespan. Also, the pre-oviposition and post-oviposition periods were all recorded. Fecundity was calculated by totalling the number of eggs laid per female. The sex ratio was computed using the number of male and female adults that emerged. A cohort of 100 freshly deposited eggs was used to conduct life table analysis in a laboratory setting. The number of individuals who survived and died at each developmental stage and age interval was recorded on a daily basis until the life cycle was completed.
 
Age-specific life table
 
Age-specific life table parameters were computed following standard ecological methods described by Birch (1948), Howe (1953) and Atwal and Bains (1974) and Chi et al., (2020).
       
The percentage mortality (100 qx) for each age interval was calculated using the formula:

 
x -   Age of the insect expressed in days.
lx -   Number of individuals surviving at the beginning of age interval x.
dx - Number of individuals dying during the age interval x.
       
Life expectancy (ex), defined as the average remaining lifespan of individuals at age x, was calculated as:


To compute life expectancy, the following intermediate parameters were determined:
Lx - The average number of individuals alive between age x and x+1, calculated as:

 
Tx  - The total number of insect-days remaining beyond age x, obtained by summing the Lx values from age x to the final age interval:
 
 Tx =  Lx + Lx+1 + Lx+2 + ....+ Lw
 
Where,
Lw = Last age interval.
       
These parameters provided a quantitative description of survival, mortality and life expectancy across successive age intervals.
 
Stage-specific life table
 
Other than the age-specific parameters, stage-specific life table parameters were also calculated to evaluate survival patterns and mortality across different developmental life stages. The parameters observed were apparent mortality, stage-specific survival fraction (SX), generation survival fraction (SG), mortality survival ratio, indispensable mortality (IM) and k-values and the total generation mortality (K). The total generation mortality (K) was calculated following the key factor analysis concept described by Varley and Gradwell (1960).
 
Apparent mortality
 
Apparent mortality is the proportion of individuals who die at a certain developmental stage compared to the number of individuals who enter that stage. It provides a direct estimate of stage-wise mortality and was calculated as follows:

 
Where
dx = Number dying during that stage
lx = Number entering a given stage.
 
Stage specific survival fraction (Sx)
 
The survival fraction for each stage was calculated using apparent mortality statistics. It represents the proportion of individuals who successfully complete one stage and move on to the next. It was calculated as follows:

 
Where
lx  = Number entering the stage.
lx+1 = Number entering the next stage.
 
Generation survival fraction (SG)
 
The total survival across immature phases was estimated by multiplying the survival fractions of subsequent stages. It was calculated as:
 
SG = SE × SL × SP
 
Where
SE = Survival fraction of egg stage.
SL = Survival fraction of larval stage.
SP  = Survival fraction of pupal stage.
       
This parameter reflects the cumulative probability of survival from egg to adult emergence.
 
Mortality survival ratio
 
The mortality survival ratio indicates the potential increase in population size that would have occurred if mortality in a particular stage had not taken place. It was estimated as:

 
Where
dx = Number dying during the stage
lx+1 = Number entering the subsequent stage.
 
Indispensable mortality (IM)
 
lndispensable mortality represents the portion of mortality attributable exclusively to a specific factor, assuming other mortality factors continue to operate. It was calculated as:
 
lM = Na × MSR
 
Where
Na = Total number of adults emerged.
       
This measure helps identify the relative importance of different mortality factors in regulating population size.
 
K-value analysis
 
K-value analysis was done for the identification of the key mortality stages which influence the population. The difference between successive logarithmic values of lx was estimated for finding the k value for each developmental stage:
 
Kx = loglx - loglx+1
 
The total generation mortality (K) was obtained by summing the stage-wise k-values:
 
k = k0+ k1+ k2 + k3
 
Where,
k0 = Egg stage.
k1= Larval stage.
k2 = Pre-pupal stage.
k3 = Pupal stage.
       
The total K-value represents overall generational mortality by giving information on population growth or decline between generations. For analysing the stage- specific mortality, larvae were collected weekly and raised in a lab setting on okra till adult emergence.
 
Statistical analysis
 
All biological and life table parameters were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using standard procedures. To demonstrate the population dynamics of Earias vittella (F.), graphs depicting the age-specific survivorship and stage-specific mortality trends were prepared.
Morphometric characteristics
 
The morphometric characteristics of Earias vittella (F.) are presented in Table 1, 2 and 3. The egg length ranged from 0.51 to 0.72 mm with a mean of 0.62 ± 0.06 mm, whereas the breadth ranged from 0.43 to 0.55 mm with an average of 0.47±0.04 mm. The measurements observed in the present study were slightly higher than those reported by Suryawanshi et al., (2001) and Sheoran et al., (2023), possibly due to variations in host plant varieties and environmental conditions.

Table 1: Morphometric characters of different immature stages of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].



Table 2: Morphometric characters of adults of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].



Table 3: Instar wise head capsule width of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].



Four larval instars were observed during the investigation. A progressive increase in larval length and breadth was noticed with each moult. The first instar larva measured 1.70±0.16 mm in length and 0.31±0.05 mm in breadth, while the fourth instar measured 13.41±1.82 mm and 3.31±0.51 mm, respectively (Table 1). Similar observations were reported by Kulhari et al., (2024) and Sheoran et al., (2023). The head capsule width increased progressively from 0.22±0.01 mm in the first instar to 0.84±0.03 mm in the fourth instar (Table 3), thereby confirming Dyar’s rule as previously reported by Suryawanshi et al., (2001).

The pupal stage measured 11.25±0.94 mm in length and 4.82±0.63 mm in breadth (Table 1; Fig 1). Adult morphometric studies indicated distinct sexual dimorphism, with females being comparatively larger than males (Table 2; Fig 2 and 3). Female adults recorded higher body length (10.90±0.80 mm), wingspan (21.55±0.82 mm) and antennal length (8.07±0.30 mm) than male adults. Similar findings were also reported by Kumar et al., (2024) and Sheoran et al., (2023).


Fig 1: Eggs of Earias vittella (F.).



Fig 2: First, second, third and fourth instars of Earias vittella (F.).



Fig 3: Pupa of Earias vittella (F.).


 
Developmental biology
 
Egg stage
 
Females laid eggs singly on tender plant parts under laboratory conditions (Fig 4). The incubation period ranged from 1 to 5 days with a mean duration of 3.30±1.26 days. Egg hatchability was recorded as 73.45±4.35 per cent (Table 4). The incubation period observed in the present study is in close agreement with the findings of Suryawanshi et al., (2001) and Kumar et al., (2024).

Fig 4: Adults of Earias vittella (F.) showing planiform and tectiform wing position.



Larval stage
 
The larva passed through four instars under laboratory conditions (Fig 5). The mean duration of the first, second, third and fourth instars was 2.00±0.86, 1.95±0.81, 1.87±0.82 and 2.81±1.23 days, respectively. The total larval period averaged 8.63±1.89 days (Table 4). The developmental durations recorded in the present study are comparable with those reported by Dhillon and Sharma (2004); Sharma et al. (2025) and Kumar et al. (2024). Minor differences may be attributed to variations in temperature, humidity and host quality.

Fig 5: Male (left) and female (right) adults of Earias vittella (F.).



Table 4: Period of different life stages of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)] under laboratory conditions.


 
Pre-pupal and pupal stage
 
The pre-pupal stage lasted for an average of 1.45±0.50 days. The pupal period ranged from 7 to 9 days with a mean duration of 7.82±0.79 days (Table 4; Fig 1). These observations are in agreement with earlier reports by Suryawanshi et al. (2001) and Sheoran et al. (2023). Environmental factors and nutritional conditions may account for minor variations in pupal duration.
 
Adult stage
 
Adult males survived for 6 to 14 days with a mean longevity of 10.44±2.70 days, whereas female adults survived for 7 to 16 days with a mean longevity of 11.25±2.60 days (Table 4). The pre-oviposition, oviposition and post-oviposition periods averaged 1.85±0.84, 6.17±1.57 and 4.06±2.05 days, respectively. Average fecundity was 161.5±24.91 eggs per female. Female longevity being higher than male longevity is in agreement with the findings of Sharma et al., (2025); Kumar et al., (2024) and Pardeshi et al., (2011).
 
Total life cycle and sex ratio
 
The total life cycle ranged from 30-43 days in males and 32-45 days in females (Table 4). The sex ratio (male:female) was recorded as 1:1.04, indicating slight female predominance. Similar sex ratio patterns were also reported in earlier studies on Earias vittella (F.).
 
Stage-specific life table
 
The stage-specific life table of Earias vittella (F.) is presented in Table 5. The highest apparent mortality was observed during the egg and first instar larval stages. Apparent mortality during the egg stage was 14.00 per cent, while the first instar stage recorded 17.44 per cent mortality. The survival fraction increased progressively from the egg stage to the pupal stage. Similarly, mortality-survival ratio and indispensable mortality values were highest during the early developmental stages. These findings are in accordance with Naresh et al., (2004) and Sharma et al., (2025), who also reported greater mortality during the early stages of development.

Table 5: Stage-specific life table of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].


       
The k-value analysis showed a gradual reduction in mortality pressure from the egg stage to the pupal stage. The egg and first instar larval stages were identified as the critical stages contributing most to generation mortality.
 
Age-specific life table
 
The age-specific life table is presented in Table 6. During the initial age interval (0-5 days), 14 individuals died out of 100, while life expectancy was highest at 4.86 days. Mortality increased during the 6-10 day interval and gradually declined during the later age intervals. No mortality was observed during the 31-40 day interval. Life expectancy gradually decreased from 4.86 to 1.00 day with increasing age.

Table 6: Age specific life table of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].


       
The survivorship pattern followed a Type III survivorship curve, which is characteristic of insect populations exhibiting high mortality during the early developmental stages. Similar survivorship trends were reported by Sharma et al., (2025); Suryawanshi et al., (2001) and Naresh et al., (2004).
 
K-value analysis
 
The K-value analysis indicated variation in stage-specific mortality (Table 5). Higher k-values were observed during the egg and first instar larval stages, whereas lower values were recorded during the later developmental stages. The total generation mortality indicated moderate survival under laboratory conditions. Similar observations were reported by Mohapatra (2007); Kumar and Saha (2025) and Andrewartha and Birch (1954).
The present study has provided comprehensive information on the morphometric characteristics, developmental biology, fecundity, sex ratio and life table characteristics of the okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (F.). The findings of the present study on Earias vittella (F.) showed that the life cycle of the species is completed in 32-45 days. High mortality was observed during the egg and larval stages. High fecundity was observed in Earias vittella (F.) and the sex ratio was slightly female-biased. Life table analysis showed that the early stages of Earias vittella (F.) had the highest contribution to generation mortality. The decreasing trend in survivorship with age and the moderate value of K suggested that Earias vittella (F.) populations would exhibit rapid growth if the factors influencing the early stages were minimized. The biological information generated in the present study may be useful in understanding the population dynamics of Earias vittella (F.) and in improving the forecasting models in relation to integrated pest management. Further studies under field conditions involving various host plants and climatic conditions are suggested to validate the present findings. The findings of the present study can serve as a basis for developing effective and sustainable management strategies against Earias vittella (F.) in okra.
The present study was supported by the Department of Entomology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India. The authors are thankful to the department for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this research work.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All insect rearing and experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with standard laboratory protocols. The study involved only invertebrate insects and did not require approval from an animal ethics committee. No vertebrate animals were used in this study.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C. (1954). The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  2. Atwal, A.S. and Bains, S.S. (1974). Applied Animal Ecology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

  3. Birch, L.C. (1948). The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology. 17: 15-26. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1605.

  4. Carey, J.R. (1993). Applied Demography for Biologists. Oxford University Press, New York.

  5. Chandra, S., Saha, R. and Pal, P., (2016). Arsenic uptake and accumulation in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) as affected by different arsenical speciation. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 96: 395- 400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1712-4.

  6. Chi, H., You, M.S., Atlýhan, R., Smith, C.L., Kavousi, A., Özgökçe, M.S., Güncan, A., Tuan, S.J., et al. (2020). Age- stage, two-sex life table: An introduction to theory, data analysis and application. Entomologia Generalis. 40(2): 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2020/0936.

  7. Dhillon, M.K. and Sharma, P.D. (2004). Studies on biology and behavior of Earias vittella for mechanisms of resistance in different cotton genotypes. Crop Protection. 23: 235- 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.08.012.

  8. Gautam, H.K., Singh, N.N. and Rai, A.B. (2013). Eco-friendly approaches for the management of shoot and fruit borer (Earias vittella fab.) In okra. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(6): 529-534.

  9. Gautam, H.K., Singh, N.N. and Rai, A.B. (2014). Screening of okra against shoot and fruit bores Earias vittella (FAB.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 48(1): 72-75. doi: 10.5 958/j.0976-058X.48.1.013.

  10. Howe, R.W. (1953). The rapid determination of the intrinsic rate of increase of an insect population. Annals of Applied Biology. 40: 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-73 48.1953.tb02372.x.

  11. Kulhari, A., Patel, R.K., Tetarwal, M.L., Bhoi, T.K. and Samal, I. (2024). Biology and morphometric study of Earias vittella. Indian Journal of Entomology. 86(1): 262-265. https:// doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.489.

  12. Kumar, M., Thakur, A., Motmayen, M.I. and Mehta, V. (2024). Studies on annual life history of okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh. Research Square. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4099882/v1.

  13. Kumar, N. and Saha, T. (2025). Lifetable analysis of Earias vittella on okra. Indian Journal of Entomology. 88(2): 295-298. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2025.2800.

  14. Mohapatra, L.N. (2007). Life table studies of Earias vittella. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41: 63-66.

  15. Naresh, V., Roy, K., Biswas, A.K. and Reza, M.W. (2004). Biology of Earias vittella. Pest Management and Economic Zoology. 12: 89-92.

  16. Ounis, S., Turóczi, G. and Kiss, J. (2024). Arthropod pests, nematodes and microbial pathogens of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and their management-A review. Agronomy. 14(12): 2841. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122841. 

  17. Pardeshi A.M., Bharodia R.K., Jethva D.M., Joshi M.D. and Patel P.V. (2011). Life fecundity tables of Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra. Agricultural Science Digest. 31(2): 93-99.

  18. Shah, M.A., Memon, N., Manan, A. and Shah, N.A. (2012). Effect of different temperatures on the development of spotted bollworm, Earias vittella under laboratory conditions. Sindh University Research Journal. 44: 487-490.

  19. Sharma, A.K., Kumar, L., Seervi, S. and Meena, S. (2025). Seasonal incidence of shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (Fab.)] on okra [Abelmoschus Esculentus (L.)] in relation to abiotic factors. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science. 37: 393-399. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2025/ v37i15281.

  20. Sheoran, S., Kalkal, D., Rolania, K., Kumar, R. and Kumari, P. (2023). Biology and morphometrics of Earias spp. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 43: 1723-1732.

  21. Shrivastava, P.K., Kumar, A. and Dhingra, M.R. (2017). Evaluation of insecticides for the management of shoot and fruit borer Earias vittella (Fab.) infesting okra. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5: 1052-1056.

  22. Suryawanshi, D.S., Pawar, V.M. and Borikar, P.S. (2001). Life- fecundity tables of Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra and cotton. Journal of Entomology. 25(4): 249-262.

  23. Southwood, T.R.E. and Henderson, P.A. (2000). Ecological Methods. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

  24. Srinivasan, R. (2006). Integrated pest management for vegetable crops. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 9: 1-10.

  25. Varley, G.C. and Gradwell, G.R. (1960). Key factors in population studies. Journal of Animal Ecology. 29: 399-401.

Biology, Morphometric Characteristics and Life Table Parameters of the Okra Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under Laboratory Conditions

R
R. Athira1
L
L. Ramazeame1,*
R
R. Nisha1
D
D. Kannan2
S
S. Karthik1
1Department of Entomology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Horticulture, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Baburayanpettai, Chengalpattu-603 201, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: In a controlled laboratory environment, the morphometric characters, developmental biology, fecundity, sex ratio and life table of the okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius), were studied. The insect exhibited four larval instars showing geometric growth in accordance with Dyar’s law.

Methods: A cohort of 100 freshly deposited eggs was used to conduct life table analysis under laboratory conditions at 25±2oC and 70 ± 10% RH. Age-specific and stage-specific life table parameters were computed. Morphometric characters of all life stages were recorded using a Leica stereomicroscope. Fecundity, sex ratio, developmental durations and survivorship were also recorded.

Results: The incubation period ranged from 1 to 5 days (3.30±1.26 days), while the total larval duration ranged from 4 to 14 days (8.63±1.89 days). The pupal period lasted 7 to 9 days (7.82±0.79 days). Adult longevity varied from 7 to 16 days in females and 6 to 14 days in males. Fecundity ranged from 146 to 181 eggs per female (161.5±24.91) and egg hatchability was 73.45±4.35%. The sex ratio (male: female) was 1:1.04. Life table analysis revealed higher mortality during egg and early larval stages. K-value analysis confirmed that early developmental stages contributed the most to generation mortality. These findings are providing essential baseline data for better integrated pest management of Earias vittella (F.) on okra.

Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] is an important vegetable grown extensively in tropical and subtropical regions of the world because of its nutritional as well as economic importance. The crop is considered to be rich in dietary fiber, vitamins and minerals, playing a significant role in human nutrition (Chandra et al., 2016). Okra is grown extensively in different agro-climatic regions of India, but its productivity is adversely affected by various biotic constraints, including insect pests (Sheoran et al., 2023; Kulhari et al., 2024). Among the insect pests infesting okra, the shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (F.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is considered one of the most destructive species (Gautam et al., 2013). The larvae bore into tender shoots, flower buds and fruits, resulting in wilting, premature dropping of flowers and fruits and rendering the produce unmarketable (Shrivastava et al., 2017). Yield losses caused by Earias vittella (F.) vary depending on crop stage and severity of infestation (Ounis et al., 2024). Due to its concealed feeding habit within plant tissues, management of this pest becomes difficult and often leads to repeated application of chemical insecticides, resulting in resistance development, environmental contamination and disruption of natural enemy complexes (Shah et al., 2012; Gautam et al., 2014).
       
Understanding the biological attributes and population dynamics of insect pests is essential for designing effective and sustainable management strategies (Southwood and Henderson, 2000; Srinivasan, 2006; Ounis et al., 2024). Life table analysis is a well-established ecological tool that provides quantitative information on survival, mortality and reproductive potential of insect populations (Birch, 1948; Howe, 1953; Carey, 1993; Chi et al., 2020).  Age-specific and stage-specific life tables help identify key mortality factors and vulnerable life stages, thereby facilitating appropriate timing of control measures (Chi et al., 2020). The developmental period, survivorship and reproductive capacity of Earias vittella (F.) might differ depending on various environmental factors, quality of the host plant and geographical location (Shah et al., 2012). Thus, it is important to establish baseline data on the life history parameters of the species under specific conditions in order to properly predict the population dynamics of the species.

In view of the above, the present investigation was carried out to evaluate the morphometric studies, developmental biology, fecundity and survivorship of Earias vittella (F.) under controlled conditions by using life table techniques.
Insect culture and rearing
 
The experiment was carried out under controlled laboratory conditions from September 2024 to February 2025 at the Department of Entomology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences. Larvae of Earias vittella (F.) were obtained from okra fields to start a laboratory culture. The insects were reared on fresh okra fruits and tender shoots in a laboratory setting of 25±2°C; 70±10% RH. To ensure reliable observations, larvae were kept individually in clean plastic containers. Fresh okra fruits were given every day till pupation. Pupae were moved to separate pots for adult emergence.
       
Newly emerged adults were paired and maintained in oviposition cages made of glass jars covered with muslin cloth. Cotton swabs soaked in 5% sugar solution were provided as food. Fresh okra twigs with tender leaves and fruits were placed inside the cage as oviposition substrate. Eggs laid on the substrate were collected daily and used for biological and life table studies.
 
Morphometric observations
 
Morphometrics of eggs, larval instars, pupae and adults were recorded with a Leica stereomicroscope. Length and breadth (mm) were measured for all stages; in adults, wingspan, antennal length and body length were taken. Head capsule width was measured for each larval instar. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
 
Biological parameters
 
The durations of each life stage were observed, encompassing the egg stage, larval instars, pre-pupal stage, pupal phase and adult lifespan. Also, the pre-oviposition and post-oviposition periods were all recorded. Fecundity was calculated by totalling the number of eggs laid per female. The sex ratio was computed using the number of male and female adults that emerged. A cohort of 100 freshly deposited eggs was used to conduct life table analysis in a laboratory setting. The number of individuals who survived and died at each developmental stage and age interval was recorded on a daily basis until the life cycle was completed.
 
Age-specific life table
 
Age-specific life table parameters were computed following standard ecological methods described by Birch (1948), Howe (1953) and Atwal and Bains (1974) and Chi et al., (2020).
       
The percentage mortality (100 qx) for each age interval was calculated using the formula:

 
x -   Age of the insect expressed in days.
lx -   Number of individuals surviving at the beginning of age interval x.
dx - Number of individuals dying during the age interval x.
       
Life expectancy (ex), defined as the average remaining lifespan of individuals at age x, was calculated as:


To compute life expectancy, the following intermediate parameters were determined:
Lx - The average number of individuals alive between age x and x+1, calculated as:

 
Tx  - The total number of insect-days remaining beyond age x, obtained by summing the Lx values from age x to the final age interval:
 
 Tx =  Lx + Lx+1 + Lx+2 + ....+ Lw
 
Where,
Lw = Last age interval.
       
These parameters provided a quantitative description of survival, mortality and life expectancy across successive age intervals.
 
Stage-specific life table
 
Other than the age-specific parameters, stage-specific life table parameters were also calculated to evaluate survival patterns and mortality across different developmental life stages. The parameters observed were apparent mortality, stage-specific survival fraction (SX), generation survival fraction (SG), mortality survival ratio, indispensable mortality (IM) and k-values and the total generation mortality (K). The total generation mortality (K) was calculated following the key factor analysis concept described by Varley and Gradwell (1960).
 
Apparent mortality
 
Apparent mortality is the proportion of individuals who die at a certain developmental stage compared to the number of individuals who enter that stage. It provides a direct estimate of stage-wise mortality and was calculated as follows:

 
Where
dx = Number dying during that stage
lx = Number entering a given stage.
 
Stage specific survival fraction (Sx)
 
The survival fraction for each stage was calculated using apparent mortality statistics. It represents the proportion of individuals who successfully complete one stage and move on to the next. It was calculated as follows:

 
Where
lx  = Number entering the stage.
lx+1 = Number entering the next stage.
 
Generation survival fraction (SG)
 
The total survival across immature phases was estimated by multiplying the survival fractions of subsequent stages. It was calculated as:
 
SG = SE × SL × SP
 
Where
SE = Survival fraction of egg stage.
SL = Survival fraction of larval stage.
SP  = Survival fraction of pupal stage.
       
This parameter reflects the cumulative probability of survival from egg to adult emergence.
 
Mortality survival ratio
 
The mortality survival ratio indicates the potential increase in population size that would have occurred if mortality in a particular stage had not taken place. It was estimated as:

 
Where
dx = Number dying during the stage
lx+1 = Number entering the subsequent stage.
 
Indispensable mortality (IM)
 
lndispensable mortality represents the portion of mortality attributable exclusively to a specific factor, assuming other mortality factors continue to operate. It was calculated as:
 
lM = Na × MSR
 
Where
Na = Total number of adults emerged.
       
This measure helps identify the relative importance of different mortality factors in regulating population size.
 
K-value analysis
 
K-value analysis was done for the identification of the key mortality stages which influence the population. The difference between successive logarithmic values of lx was estimated for finding the k value for each developmental stage:
 
Kx = loglx - loglx+1
 
The total generation mortality (K) was obtained by summing the stage-wise k-values:
 
k = k0+ k1+ k2 + k3
 
Where,
k0 = Egg stage.
k1= Larval stage.
k2 = Pre-pupal stage.
k3 = Pupal stage.
       
The total K-value represents overall generational mortality by giving information on population growth or decline between generations. For analysing the stage- specific mortality, larvae were collected weekly and raised in a lab setting on okra till adult emergence.
 
Statistical analysis
 
All biological and life table parameters were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using standard procedures. To demonstrate the population dynamics of Earias vittella (F.), graphs depicting the age-specific survivorship and stage-specific mortality trends were prepared.
Morphometric characteristics
 
The morphometric characteristics of Earias vittella (F.) are presented in Table 1, 2 and 3. The egg length ranged from 0.51 to 0.72 mm with a mean of 0.62 ± 0.06 mm, whereas the breadth ranged from 0.43 to 0.55 mm with an average of 0.47±0.04 mm. The measurements observed in the present study were slightly higher than those reported by Suryawanshi et al., (2001) and Sheoran et al., (2023), possibly due to variations in host plant varieties and environmental conditions.

Table 1: Morphometric characters of different immature stages of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].



Table 2: Morphometric characters of adults of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].



Table 3: Instar wise head capsule width of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].



Four larval instars were observed during the investigation. A progressive increase in larval length and breadth was noticed with each moult. The first instar larva measured 1.70±0.16 mm in length and 0.31±0.05 mm in breadth, while the fourth instar measured 13.41±1.82 mm and 3.31±0.51 mm, respectively (Table 1). Similar observations were reported by Kulhari et al., (2024) and Sheoran et al., (2023). The head capsule width increased progressively from 0.22±0.01 mm in the first instar to 0.84±0.03 mm in the fourth instar (Table 3), thereby confirming Dyar’s rule as previously reported by Suryawanshi et al., (2001).

The pupal stage measured 11.25±0.94 mm in length and 4.82±0.63 mm in breadth (Table 1; Fig 1). Adult morphometric studies indicated distinct sexual dimorphism, with females being comparatively larger than males (Table 2; Fig 2 and 3). Female adults recorded higher body length (10.90±0.80 mm), wingspan (21.55±0.82 mm) and antennal length (8.07±0.30 mm) than male adults. Similar findings were also reported by Kumar et al., (2024) and Sheoran et al., (2023).


Fig 1: Eggs of Earias vittella (F.).



Fig 2: First, second, third and fourth instars of Earias vittella (F.).



Fig 3: Pupa of Earias vittella (F.).


 
Developmental biology
 
Egg stage
 
Females laid eggs singly on tender plant parts under laboratory conditions (Fig 4). The incubation period ranged from 1 to 5 days with a mean duration of 3.30±1.26 days. Egg hatchability was recorded as 73.45±4.35 per cent (Table 4). The incubation period observed in the present study is in close agreement with the findings of Suryawanshi et al., (2001) and Kumar et al., (2024).

Fig 4: Adults of Earias vittella (F.) showing planiform and tectiform wing position.



Larval stage
 
The larva passed through four instars under laboratory conditions (Fig 5). The mean duration of the first, second, third and fourth instars was 2.00±0.86, 1.95±0.81, 1.87±0.82 and 2.81±1.23 days, respectively. The total larval period averaged 8.63±1.89 days (Table 4). The developmental durations recorded in the present study are comparable with those reported by Dhillon and Sharma (2004); Sharma et al. (2025) and Kumar et al. (2024). Minor differences may be attributed to variations in temperature, humidity and host quality.

Fig 5: Male (left) and female (right) adults of Earias vittella (F.).



Table 4: Period of different life stages of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)] under laboratory conditions.


 
Pre-pupal and pupal stage
 
The pre-pupal stage lasted for an average of 1.45±0.50 days. The pupal period ranged from 7 to 9 days with a mean duration of 7.82±0.79 days (Table 4; Fig 1). These observations are in agreement with earlier reports by Suryawanshi et al. (2001) and Sheoran et al. (2023). Environmental factors and nutritional conditions may account for minor variations in pupal duration.
 
Adult stage
 
Adult males survived for 6 to 14 days with a mean longevity of 10.44±2.70 days, whereas female adults survived for 7 to 16 days with a mean longevity of 11.25±2.60 days (Table 4). The pre-oviposition, oviposition and post-oviposition periods averaged 1.85±0.84, 6.17±1.57 and 4.06±2.05 days, respectively. Average fecundity was 161.5±24.91 eggs per female. Female longevity being higher than male longevity is in agreement with the findings of Sharma et al., (2025); Kumar et al., (2024) and Pardeshi et al., (2011).
 
Total life cycle and sex ratio
 
The total life cycle ranged from 30-43 days in males and 32-45 days in females (Table 4). The sex ratio (male:female) was recorded as 1:1.04, indicating slight female predominance. Similar sex ratio patterns were also reported in earlier studies on Earias vittella (F.).
 
Stage-specific life table
 
The stage-specific life table of Earias vittella (F.) is presented in Table 5. The highest apparent mortality was observed during the egg and first instar larval stages. Apparent mortality during the egg stage was 14.00 per cent, while the first instar stage recorded 17.44 per cent mortality. The survival fraction increased progressively from the egg stage to the pupal stage. Similarly, mortality-survival ratio and indispensable mortality values were highest during the early developmental stages. These findings are in accordance with Naresh et al., (2004) and Sharma et al., (2025), who also reported greater mortality during the early stages of development.

Table 5: Stage-specific life table of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].


       
The k-value analysis showed a gradual reduction in mortality pressure from the egg stage to the pupal stage. The egg and first instar larval stages were identified as the critical stages contributing most to generation mortality.
 
Age-specific life table
 
The age-specific life table is presented in Table 6. During the initial age interval (0-5 days), 14 individuals died out of 100, while life expectancy was highest at 4.86 days. Mortality increased during the 6-10 day interval and gradually declined during the later age intervals. No mortality was observed during the 31-40 day interval. Life expectancy gradually decreased from 4.86 to 1.00 day with increasing age.

Table 6: Age specific life table of okra shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (F.)].


       
The survivorship pattern followed a Type III survivorship curve, which is characteristic of insect populations exhibiting high mortality during the early developmental stages. Similar survivorship trends were reported by Sharma et al., (2025); Suryawanshi et al., (2001) and Naresh et al., (2004).
 
K-value analysis
 
The K-value analysis indicated variation in stage-specific mortality (Table 5). Higher k-values were observed during the egg and first instar larval stages, whereas lower values were recorded during the later developmental stages. The total generation mortality indicated moderate survival under laboratory conditions. Similar observations were reported by Mohapatra (2007); Kumar and Saha (2025) and Andrewartha and Birch (1954).
The present study has provided comprehensive information on the morphometric characteristics, developmental biology, fecundity, sex ratio and life table characteristics of the okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (F.). The findings of the present study on Earias vittella (F.) showed that the life cycle of the species is completed in 32-45 days. High mortality was observed during the egg and larval stages. High fecundity was observed in Earias vittella (F.) and the sex ratio was slightly female-biased. Life table analysis showed that the early stages of Earias vittella (F.) had the highest contribution to generation mortality. The decreasing trend in survivorship with age and the moderate value of K suggested that Earias vittella (F.) populations would exhibit rapid growth if the factors influencing the early stages were minimized. The biological information generated in the present study may be useful in understanding the population dynamics of Earias vittella (F.) and in improving the forecasting models in relation to integrated pest management. Further studies under field conditions involving various host plants and climatic conditions are suggested to validate the present findings. The findings of the present study can serve as a basis for developing effective and sustainable management strategies against Earias vittella (F.) in okra.
The present study was supported by the Department of Entomology, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, India. The authors are thankful to the department for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this research work.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All insect rearing and experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with standard laboratory protocols. The study involved only invertebrate insects and did not require approval from an animal ethics committee. No vertebrate animals were used in this study.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C. (1954). The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  2. Atwal, A.S. and Bains, S.S. (1974). Applied Animal Ecology. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.

  3. Birch, L.C. (1948). The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology. 17: 15-26. https:// doi.org/10.2307/1605.

  4. Carey, J.R. (1993). Applied Demography for Biologists. Oxford University Press, New York.

  5. Chandra, S., Saha, R. and Pal, P., (2016). Arsenic uptake and accumulation in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) as affected by different arsenical speciation. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 96: 395- 400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-015-1712-4.

  6. Chi, H., You, M.S., Atlýhan, R., Smith, C.L., Kavousi, A., Özgökçe, M.S., Güncan, A., Tuan, S.J., et al. (2020). Age- stage, two-sex life table: An introduction to theory, data analysis and application. Entomologia Generalis. 40(2): 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2020/0936.

  7. Dhillon, M.K. and Sharma, P.D. (2004). Studies on biology and behavior of Earias vittella for mechanisms of resistance in different cotton genotypes. Crop Protection. 23: 235- 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.08.012.

  8. Gautam, H.K., Singh, N.N. and Rai, A.B. (2013). Eco-friendly approaches for the management of shoot and fruit borer (Earias vittella fab.) In okra. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 47(6): 529-534.

  9. Gautam, H.K., Singh, N.N. and Rai, A.B. (2014). Screening of okra against shoot and fruit bores Earias vittella (FAB.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 48(1): 72-75. doi: 10.5 958/j.0976-058X.48.1.013.

  10. Howe, R.W. (1953). The rapid determination of the intrinsic rate of increase of an insect population. Annals of Applied Biology. 40: 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-73 48.1953.tb02372.x.

  11. Kulhari, A., Patel, R.K., Tetarwal, M.L., Bhoi, T.K. and Samal, I. (2024). Biology and morphometric study of Earias vittella. Indian Journal of Entomology. 86(1): 262-265. https:// doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.489.

  12. Kumar, M., Thakur, A., Motmayen, M.I. and Mehta, V. (2024). Studies on annual life history of okra shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh. Research Square. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4099882/v1.

  13. Kumar, N. and Saha, T. (2025). Lifetable analysis of Earias vittella on okra. Indian Journal of Entomology. 88(2): 295-298. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2025.2800.

  14. Mohapatra, L.N. (2007). Life table studies of Earias vittella. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 41: 63-66.

  15. Naresh, V., Roy, K., Biswas, A.K. and Reza, M.W. (2004). Biology of Earias vittella. Pest Management and Economic Zoology. 12: 89-92.

  16. Ounis, S., Turóczi, G. and Kiss, J. (2024). Arthropod pests, nematodes and microbial pathogens of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) and their management-A review. Agronomy. 14(12): 2841. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122841. 

  17. Pardeshi A.M., Bharodia R.K., Jethva D.M., Joshi M.D. and Patel P.V. (2011). Life fecundity tables of Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra. Agricultural Science Digest. 31(2): 93-99.

  18. Shah, M.A., Memon, N., Manan, A. and Shah, N.A. (2012). Effect of different temperatures on the development of spotted bollworm, Earias vittella under laboratory conditions. Sindh University Research Journal. 44: 487-490.

  19. Sharma, A.K., Kumar, L., Seervi, S. and Meena, S. (2025). Seasonal incidence of shoot and fruit borer [Earias vittella (Fab.)] on okra [Abelmoschus Esculentus (L.)] in relation to abiotic factors. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science. 37: 393-399. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2025/ v37i15281.

  20. Sheoran, S., Kalkal, D., Rolania, K., Kumar, R. and Kumari, P. (2023). Biology and morphometrics of Earias spp. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 43: 1723-1732.

  21. Shrivastava, P.K., Kumar, A. and Dhingra, M.R. (2017). Evaluation of insecticides for the management of shoot and fruit borer Earias vittella (Fab.) infesting okra. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 5: 1052-1056.

  22. Suryawanshi, D.S., Pawar, V.M. and Borikar, P.S. (2001). Life- fecundity tables of Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra and cotton. Journal of Entomology. 25(4): 249-262.

  23. Southwood, T.R.E. and Henderson, P.A. (2000). Ecological Methods. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

  24. Srinivasan, R. (2006). Integrated pest management for vegetable crops. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 9: 1-10.

  25. Varley, G.C. and Gradwell, G.R. (1960). Key factors in population studies. Journal of Animal Ecology. 29: 399-401.
In this Article
Published In
Agricultural Science Digest

Editorial Board

View all (0)