Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.176, CiteScore: 0.357

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Impact of Foliar Application of Sodium Nitroprusside on Certain Morpho-physiological, Biochemical and Yield Parameters of Kharif Maize (Zea mays L.) Grown under Rainfed Condition

K.N. Madhusudhana Reddy1, Md. Afjal Ahmad1,*, Madhurya Ray1, Savita Jangde1, Manju Jat1, Shreyashi Singh1
  • 0009-0001-9528-2156
1Department of Plant Physiology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221 005, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Background: Maize (Zea mays L.) belongs to the family poaceae is one of the most important cereal next to rice and wheat in the world. Maize is referred to as the “queen of cereals” and may be produced all year due to its photothermic-insensitive traits and highest genetic yield among the cereals. Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) is a chemical compound that has multiple implications and positive modulating effects on mitigating different abiotic stresses especially water deficit regimes. SNP enhances the nutrient uptake and anchoring of the plant root system and also mitigates water stress.

Methods: In this context, a field experiment was designed to study the impact of foliar application of SNP on certain morpho-physiological, biochemical and yield parameters of kharif maize grown under rainfed condition. A randomized complete block design (RBD) was employed, with treatments including different concentration of SNP (100, 200, 300 and 400 µM SNP) exogenously applied on maize crop (variety- CP-858) at various critical growth stages.

Result: Significant differences were observed with reference to various morpho-physiological, biochemical and yield traits under control and treated plots. Results indicate significant improvements in these parameters following SNP application in comparison to control which significantly implies its possible role in mitigating water stress under rainfed condition.

GSH- Glutathione-S-Transferase, NO- Nitric oxide, SNP- Sodium nitroprusside, T- Treatment.
After rice and wheat, maize (Zea mays L.), a member of the poaceae family, is the most significant cereal in the world. Due to its highest genetic output among the cereals and characteristics that make it resistant to photothermia, maize is known as the “queen of cereals” and can be cultivated year-round. It is a C4 plant that is highly effective at converting solar energy into dry matter. (Latif et al., 2024). In addition to being utilised  as food for humans and animals, maize has several industrial uses. It’s common practice to roast and consume green corn. 10% protein, 4% oil, and 2% to 3% crude fibre are found in maize seed (Sain et al., 2023).
       
Nitroprusside is a complex anion with a Fe-N-O angle of 176.2oand an idealized symmetry. It is a donor of nitric oxide (NO). Nitric oxide (NO), an endogenous signaling molecule, is believed to regulate growth and photosynthetic processes as well as reduce stress. NO crosstalk with other phytohormones is one of the primary potential factors regulating physiological processes that occur in stressed plants. NO regulates cytokinin levels, auxin transport, and signaling, which promotes root growth and development.
       
Due to its function as a nitric oxide (NO) donor, which aids plants in overcoming a variety of environmental stresses, applying sodium nitroprusside (SNP) to rainfed maize can be very advantageous. As rainfed maize depends so heavily on natural rainfall, it is susceptible to temperature changes, drought stress, and deficiencies in soil moisture. Due to water constraint, rainfed maize frequently experiences oxidative stress, decreased photosynthesis and stomatal closure. Under drought conditions, SNP reduces transpiration loss and improves water-use efficiency by releasing nitric oxide (NO), which helps control stomatal opening. Maize undergoes oxidative stress when there is insufficient rainfall because of the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
       
Antioxidant enzymes that scavenge ROS and stop cellular damage, such as peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), are activated more by SNP. This provides a plausible explanation is to why SNP is suited for kharif maize under water stress conditions to mitigate the stress.
       
Nitric oxide (NO) is an endogenous signaling molecule that has been shown to ameliorate stressful situations (Ahmad et al., 2016; Shi et al., 2016) and control development and photosynthesis (Fatma et al., 2016). According to Hermes et al., (2013), the external injection of NO can also change gene expression and reduce oxidative stress. One of the main elements potentially involved in the physiological processes occurring in stressed plants is NO crosstalk with other phytohormones (Sanz et al., 2015). NO promotes root growth and development via controlling auxin transport, cytokinin level, and signaling (Fernandez-Marcos  et al., 2011; Liu and Gou, 2013 and Mohanlal et al., 2021). NO can alter the activity of the Asc-Glu cycle’s enzymes and scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Begara-Morales et al., 2015). In Oryza sativa, Singh et al., (2016) found that an external supply of NO increased GSH content by up-regulating gamma-glutamyl cysteine synthetase, maintaining the GSH/GSSG ratio. According to reports, NO in the form of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) has been shown to be highly successful at improving wheat’s redox status, photosynthesis, relative water content, and gas exchange characteristics when it is subjected to abiotic stress (Tian and Lei, 2007). NO reduces water loss through transpiration by influencing stomatal closure. By reducing excessive water loss and upregulating genes related to osmoprotection, antioxidant defense, and membrane stability, it works in tandem with abscisic acid (ABA) to improve drought tolerance, a common issue in rainfed environments.
       
Kharif maize is a crucial cereal crop in Uttar Pradesh, primarily grown during the monsoon season under rainfed conditions, (Manavalagan et al., 2024). Kharif maize was chosen in placeof rabi maize because erratic rainfall patterns, prolonged dry spells and increasing climate variability make kharif maize highly vulnerable to water stress provides an opportunity to study the effect of abiotic stress and climate change. Kharif maize contributes significantly to global maize production, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. In India it is grown in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.
       
In this context, effect of different doses of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) on key morphological, physiological, and biochemical parameters in kharif Maize (Zea mays) under rainfed condition was studied and analyzed under field conditions.
The trial was carried out during the kharif season of 2022-23 at the Agricultural Research Farm of Banaras Hindu University, located approximately 10 km southwest of Varanasi railway station. The experimental field is situated at 25°18'N latitude, 83°03'E longitude, and at an elevation of 75.7 meters above mean sea level, within the North Gangetic alluvial plain. The meteorological data and experimental details are given in (Fig 1a) and Table 1 respectively.

Fig 1a: Meteorological data (kharif 2022-23).



Table 1: Experimental details.


       
SNP is reported to have heavy metal stress mitigating effects in maize at concentrations of 100 µM (Naseem et al., 2020). Therefore, different enhanced concentrations of SNP were taken to study the rainfed cultivation of maize. The treatment details having various concentration of sodium nitroprusside are discussed in Table 2.

Table 2: Treatment details.


       
Plant height, leaf area index, test weight, sink size, number of leaves and yield per plot were recorded manually. Crop Growth Rate (CGR) represents the amount of dry weight grained in a unit land area per unit time and was calculated using the formula given by Watson (1952) in a non-destructive method. Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content were estimated using the formula of Arnon (1949). Total protein content was estimated from leaf samples using Bradford method. Total soluble sugars were estimated using the protocol by Samogyi et al., 1952. Membrane stability index was identified using formula given by Sairam et al., (1997). Chlorophyll stability index was determined using the formula;
 
 
 Apart from morphological, physiological data, yield parameters were also recorded in terms of test weight, sink size and yield per plot (kg). The overall experimental plan has been depicted in (Fig 1). All, the statistical analysis was done using OPSTAT website (http://14.139.232.166/opstat/).
 

Fig 1b: Overall experimental planning.

At 30 DAE, T4 (400 µM) had the highest mean plant height among the different concentrations of SNP, with a mean height of 143 cm, compared to the other treatment plots, which had mean plant heights of 124.33 (T0), 129.33 (T1), 134.66 (T2) and 130.33 (T3).
       
All SNP treatments, including T1, T2, T3 and T4, demonstrated substantial changes from the control at 60 DAE. When SNP was sprayed at 400 µM (T4), plant height was considerably higher than in the control plot, with a mean height of 182.33 cm. With a mean height of 173 cm in comparison to the control plot, T2 (200 µM) had the next-highest value of plant height (Table 3).

Table 3: Effect of exogenous application of sodium nitroprusside on plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, leaf area index of maize grown under rainfed condition.


       
Leaf area index of maize was recorded at 30 DAE and 60 DAE and the data is presented in Table 3. Exogenous application of SNP at 400 µM (T4) concentration at 30 DAE significantly increased LAI 2.64 compared to control plot. With a mean leaf area index of 2.58 in comparison to the control plot, exogenous application of SNP @ 300 µM (T3) produced the next higher value of the leaf area index. The remaining treatments differ compared to other treatments and from the control. Exogenous application of SNP at 400 µM (T4) at 60 DAE revealed a higher LAI value than the control plot, with a mean value of 3.79. With a mean value of 3.727, spray of SNP @ 300 µM (T3) was recorded the next higher LAI value. The remaining treatments differ compared to other treatments and from the control.
       
The control plot treated with water had the lowest number of leaves, with mean values of 6.33 at 30 DAE and 12.33 at 60 DAE. Nayanakantha et al., (2016) sprayed varying doses of SNP on maize. SNP concentrations ranging from 200 µM to 500 µM were shown to be most effective for growth parameters such as stem diameter, shoot height, dry weight, and leaf area. The maize leaf area index was measured at 30 DAE and 60 DAE, and it considerably varied as a result of different SNP concentrations. The higher leaf area index was recorded at 400 µM SNP was 2.64 and the lowest at 30 DAE in the control plot was 2.31. The results for the leaf area index at 60 DAE vary amongst plots, SNP @ 400 µM (T4) notably displays a greater value 3.79 in comparison to other plots, while the control plot has the lowest value, with a mean value of 3.153. Barzin et al., (2022) showed similar results in pot marigold, as did Chohan et al., (2012) in chickpea.
       
The data analyzed and was recorded pertaining to Crop growth rate of maize as influenced by exogenous application of SNP is presented in (Fig 2). When compared to other treatments, the SNP @ 400 µM (T4) spray considerably was recorded the highest crop growth rate at 30 DAE with a mean value of 9.3 g/m2/day. With a mean value of 8.69 g/m2/day in comparison to the control plot, treatment 300 µM had the next greater crop growth rate. In comparison to treated plots, the control plot’s mean crop growth rate was the lowest, at 6.94 g/m2/day. Spray of SNP, i.e., T1, T2, T3 and T4 exhibited significant differences over the control at 60 DAE among all treatments. With a mean value of 8.92 g/m2/day, spraying SNP at 400 µM exhibited the highest crop growth rate, followed by spraying SNP at 300 µM with a mean value of 8.88 g/m2/day and spraying SNP at 200 µM and 100 µM with significant differences from the control.

Fig 2: Effect of different Sodium Nitroprusside concentrations on the crop growth rate for 30 and 60 DAE of maize grown under rainfed condition.


       
The observations on chlorophyll ‘a’, ‘b’ and total chlorophyll content of maize were was recorded at 30 DAE and 60 DAE and has been presented in Table 4. Significantly greater value for chlorophyll ‘a’ was obtained by SNP @ 400 µM (T4), with a mean value of 2.065 mg/g FW in comparison to the control plot. In comparison to other treatments, T3 (300 µM) had the next greater value of chlorophyll ‘a’. When compared to the control plot, the spray of SNP at 400 M considerably increased the amount of chlorophyll ‘b’, with a mean value of 0.901 mg/g FW. Spray of SNP @ 400 µM (T4) among the treatments showed increased total chlorophyll content with a mean value of 2.966 mg/g FW in comparison to other treatments. The next higher mean value of total chlorophyll content was found in treatment (T3) compared to other treatments, while the lowest mean value was found in the control plot, at 2.285 mg/g FW. From above data it is concluded that exogenous application of SNP at concentration @ 400 µM shows higher value for chlorophyll ‘a’, ‘b’ and total chlorophyll content at 30 DAE and lowest value observed in control plot.  The highest total protein content was found at T4 (400 µM) at 30 DAE, with a mean value of 1.316 mg/g FW in comparison to other treatment plots (Fig 3). With a mean value of 1.242 mg/g FW in comparison to other treatments, T3 (300 µM) had the next highest value of total protein content. With a mean value of 1.19 mg/g FW and 1.113 mg/g FW when compared to the control plot, the treatments T2 (200 µM) and T1 (100 µM) followed by third and fourth in terms of total protein content, respectively. The control plot had the lowest mean value, 1.095 mg/g FW, when compared to the plots treated with foliar SNP treatment. From the above data it is concluded that exogenous application of SNP at different concentration (T1, T2, T3, T4) show a positive effect on total protein content at 30 DAE, whereas concentration @ 400 µM (T4) shows higher value compared to other treatments. The observations on soluble sugar content of maize were was recorded at 30 DAE and 60 DAE and has been presented in (Fig 4).

Table 4: Effect of exogenous application of Sodium Nitroprusside on chlorophyll ‘a’, ‘b’ and total chlorophyll content (mg/g FW) of maize grown under rainfed conditions.



Fig 3: Effect of different Sodium Nitroprusside concentrations on the Total protein content for 30 and 60 DAE of maize leaf sample grown under rainfed condition.



Fig 4: Effect of different Sodium Nitroprusside concentrations on the total soluble sugar for 30 and 60 DAE of maize leaf sample grown under rainfed condition.


       
Membrane Thermo-stability index of maize as influenced by different concentration of SNP at 30 DAE and 60 DAE and the data regarding the observation has been presented in Table 5.
       
When compared to other treatments, exogenous application of SNP @ 400 µM (T4) substantially was recorded the highest value chlorophyll stability index at 30 DAE with a mean value of 79.28% (Fig 5). The T3 (300 µM) had the next-highest value of the chlorophyll stability index, with a mean value of 76.90% in comparison to the other treatments. In comparison to the control plot, the mean values of the experimental plots treated with 200 µM (T2) and 100 µM (T1) concentrations of SNP are 72.43% and 68.28%, respectively. In comparison to plots treated with SNP, the control plot’s mean value of 61.90% for the chlorophyll stability index was the lowest.

Fig 5: Effect of different Sodium Nitroprusside concentrations on the chlorophyll stability index for 30 and 60 DAE of maize grown under rainfed condition. T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 are different treatments.


       
Over the control, the sink size was much larger after each treatment. With a mean value of 4.362 in comparison to other treatments, the exogenous application of SNP @ 400 µM (T3) showed the highest sink size among all the treatments. Other treatments are comparable to one another but much more effective than controls. In comparison to plots treated with SNP at various concentrations, the control plot had the smallest sink size, with a mean value of 4.65. When compared to the control, all treatments had considerably higher test weight. In comparison to other treatment plots, the exogenous application of SNP @ 400 µM (T1) was recorded the highest test weight with a primary value of 23.37 g. In comparison to the control plot, the next higher test weight value was observed at 300 µM (T2) with a mean value of 20.805 gram. When SNP concentration was applied at 100 µM (T1), test weight gradually decreased, with a mean value of 19.11 g. When compared to other treatment plots, the control plot had the lowest test weight value, with a mean value of 19.06 g. When compared to other treatments, exogenous application of SNP @ 400 µM (T4) considerably increased yield per plot with a mean value of 14.06 kg. When compared to other treatments, the T3 (300 µM) had the highest yield per plot with a mean value of 13.52 kg. The experimental plots treated with 200 µM (T3) and 100 µM (T1) concentrations of SNP exhibited a mean value of 12.53 kg and 11.39 kg, respectively, when compared to the control plot. In comparison to plots treated with SNP, the control plot had the lowest yield per plot, with a mean value of 9.68 kg (Fig 6).

Fig 6: Impact of different Sodium Nitroprusside concentrations on the sink size, test weight and yield per plot of maize grown under rainfed condition.


       
With higher SNP doses, crop growth rate increased significantly. In comparison to other plots, SNP @ 400 µM displays the higher crop growth rate with mean values of 9.3 g/m2/day at 30 DAE and 8.92 g/m2/day at 60 DAE. The control plot had the lowest crop growth rate, with a mean value of 6.9 g/m2/day at 30 DAE and 8.03 g/m2/day at 60 DAE. Therefore, it can be summarized that morpho-physiological indices such as plant height, number of leaves, leaf area index, and crop growth rate were considerably raised with increasing Sodium Nitroprusside doses. According to current study, chlorophyll a (1.767 mg/g FW in control to 2.065 mg/g FW at 400 µM), Chlorophyll ‘b’ (0.518 mg/g FW in control to 0.901 mg/g FW @ 400 µM), and Total Chlorophyll Content (2.85 mg/g FW in control to 2.966 mg/g FW in 400 µM) at 30 DAE and Chlorophyll ‘a’ (1.595 mg/g FW in control to 1.787 mg/g FW in 400 µM), Chlorophyll ‘b’ (0.59 mg/g FW in control to 1.005 mg/g FW in 400 µM) and total chlorophyll content showed positive results for foliar spray of SNP at different concentrations. Chlorophyll ‘a’, ‘b’ and total chlorophyll content significantly increased in the plots treated with varying concentrations of SNP, whereas the control plot showed a decrease in all three of these components. Under rainfed conditions, sodium nitroprusside (SNP) has a favourable effect on biochemical markers in maize. The results are comparable to those obtained by Ali et al., (2017). Exogenous SNP treatment effectively delayed chlorophyll breakdown and yellowing of broccoli florets during storage at 20oC SNP may have accomplished this by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, reducing the activity of Chl-degrading enzymes and suppressing associated gene expression (Wang et al., 2015).
       
Of all the treatments, foliar application of SNP @ 400 µM (T4) recorded higher total protein content with a mean value of 1.316 mg/g/FW compared to other plots, while the next higher value of total protein content was recorded in 300 µM with a mean value of 1.242 mg/g/FW compared to control plot (1.095 mg/g/FW) at 30 DAE. Total protein content gradually increased with application of SNP @ 400 µM (2.057 mg/g/FW) compare to control plot with a mean value of 1.687 mg/g/FW at 60 DAE. Foliar application of SNP @ 400 µM (T4) recorded higher soluble sugar content with a mean value of 0.933 mg/g/FW compared to other plots, followed by 300 µM with a mean value of 0.838 mg/g/FW compared to control plot (0.678 mg/g/FW) at 30 DAE and soluble sugar content gradually increased with application of SNP @ 400 µM (1.343 mg/g/FW) compared to control plot with a mean value of 0.678 mg/g/FW. T4 (400 µM) concentration of Sodium Nitroprusside has a beneficial influence on biochemical parameters such as Chlorophyll ‘a’, ‘b’, and total chlorophyll content, Total protein content, Soluble sugar content, Membrane thermo-stability index, and Chlorophyll stability index. A low concentration of NO increased soluble protein accumulation, while a high concentration of NO prevented soluble protein accumulation. NO was discovered to influence a number of protein accumulations involved in material and energy metabolism, including ATPase and LOX, according to Bai et al., (2011). Foliar application of SNP considerably impacted the test weight among treatments, with the test weight achieved in T4 (23.376g) being much greater than the values recorded in rainfed maize control plots. When compared to treated plots, the higher sink size was recorded with foliar application of SNP @ 200 µM with a mean value of 5.142 and the lowest sink size was recorded in T4 with a mean value of 4.362. Among varied concentrations of SNP @ 400 µM (T4), the yield per plot increased significantly, with a mean value of 14.06 kg compared to other plots. In comparison to the treated plots, the yield per plot decreased in the control plot, with a mean value of 9.68 kg. Different Sodium Nitroprusside concentrations produced superior outcomes on yield and yield-related characteristics such as test weight, sink size, yield per plot, however T4 and T3 were found to be the best treatments in this regard. The T4 treatment showed the highest height of the plants which can be attributed to improved root anchorage, water retention, or nutrient uptake due to SNP.
These findings suggested that foliar application of SNP at various concentrations can be employed to boost the productivity of maize variety C.P-858. On the basis of the observations and results from the current study, it can be concluded that foliar spray of Sodium Nitroprusside @ 400 µM shows better results in maize variety C.P-858 compared to control plot grown under rainfed conditions.
Authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Institutions of Eminence, IoE-BHU seed grant scheme.
There is no conflict of interest.

  1. Ahmad, P., Abdel Latef, A.A., Hashem, A., Abd Allah, E.F., Gucel, S. and Tran, L.S.P. (2016). Nitric oxide mitigates salt stress by regulating levels of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes in chickpea. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7: 347.

  2. Ali, Q., Daud, M.K., Haider, M.Z., Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Aslam, N. and Zhu, S.J. (2017). Seed priming by sodium nitroprusside improves salt tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by enhancing physiological and biochemical parameters. Plant Physiology and  Biochemistry. 119: 50-58.

  3. Arnon, D.I. (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Poly- phenoloxidase in beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 24: 1- 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.

  4. Bai, X., Yang, L., Yang, Y., Ahmad, P., Yang, Y., Hu, X., 2011. Deciphering the protective role of nitric oxide against salt stress at the physiological and proteomic levels in maize. J. Proteome Res. 10: 4349-4364. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr200333f.

  5. Barzin, G., Kazemi, M.M. and Entezari, M. (2022). The interaction effects of NaCl stress and sodium nitroprusside on growth, physiological and biochemical responses of Calendula officinalis L. Biologia. 77(8): 2081-2091.

  6. Begara-Morales, J.C., Sánchez-Calvo, B., Chaki, M., Valderrama, R., Mata-Pérez, C., Padilla, M.N., Corpas, F.J. and Barroso, J.B., (2015). Modulation of the ascorbate-glutathione cycle antioxidant capacity by posttranslational modifications mediated by nitric oxide in abiotic stress situations. Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Damage in Plants Under Stress. pp. 305-320.

  7. Chohan, A., Parmar, U. and Raina, S.K. (2012). Effect of sodium nitroprusside on morphological characters under chilling stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Environ mental Biology. 33(4): 695.

  8. Fatma, M., Masood, A., Per, T.S. and Khan, N.A., 2016. Nitric oxide alleviates salt stress inhibited photosynthetic performance by interacting with sulfur assimilation in mustard. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7: 521.

  9. Fernández-Marcos, M., Sanz, L., Lewis, D.R., Muday, G.K. and Lorenzo, O. (2011). Nitric oxide causes root apical meristem defects and growth inhibition while reducing PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1)-dependent acropetal auxin transport. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(45): 18506- 18511.

  10. Hermes, V.S., Dall’Asta, P., Amaral, F.P., Anacleto, K.B. and Arisi, A.C.M. (2013). The regulation of transcription of genes related to oxidative stress and glutathione synthesis in Zea mays leaves by nitric oxide. Biologia plantarum. 57(4): 620-626.

  11. Liu, F. and Guo, F.Q. (2013). Nitric oxide deficiency accelerates chlorophyll breakdown and stability loss of thylakoid membranes during dark-induced leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 8(2): p.e56345.

  12. Manavalagan, N., Velusamy, M., Jerlin, R., Kalarani, M.K., Kokiladevi, E. (2024). Alleviating impact of PEG induced drought stress on maize seed germination and vigour with effective seed priming agents. Agricultural Science Digest. 44(1): 28-34. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5808.

  13. Mohanlal A.V., Saravanan K., Sabesan T. (2021). Water-stress Screening in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] genotypes using polyethylene glycol 6000 at seedling growth stage. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 55(4): 440-445. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5524.

  14. Naseem, M., Anwar-ul-Haq, M., Akhtar, J., and Jaskani, M.J. (2020). Exogenous Application of Salicylic Acid and Sodium Nitro- prusside on Maize under Selenium Stress. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 57(1):

  15. Nayanakantha, N.M.C., Hettiarachchi, N.N., Seneviratne, P. and Wathugala, D.L. (2016). Exogenous nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside enhanced growth attributes of polybagged rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) seedlings.

  16. Nelson, S. (1952) N., J. Bid. Chem. 163: 375. 

  17. Latif. P.A., Zahoor. D.A., Aijaz. L.A. and Mohd. B.Y. (2024). Drought stress-induced impact on morpho-physiological traits in maize landraces of Kashmir. Agricultural Science Digest. 43(6): 758-766. doi:10.18805/ag.D-5593.

  18. Sain, S., Maitra, S., Shankar, T. and Sairam, M. (2023). Competitive ability of legume-based intercrop for rabi maize (Zea mays L.) in north eastern ghats of Odisha. Crop Research. 58: (3and4): 136-143.

  19. Sairam R.K., Deshmukh, P.S., Shukla, D.S. (1997). Tolerance to drought and temperature stress in relation to increased antioxidant enzyme activity in wheat. - J. Agron. Crop Sci. 178: 171-177.

  20. Sanz, L., Albertos, P., Mateos, I., Sanchez-Vicente, I., Lechon, T., Fernandez Marcos, M., et al. (2015). Nitric oxide (NO) and phytohormones crosstalk during early plant development. J. Exp. Bot. 66: 2857-2868. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv213.

  21. Shi, J., Gao, L., Zuo, J., Wang, Q., Wang, Q. and Fan, L. (2016). Exogenous sodium nitroprusside treatment of broccoli florets extends shelf life, enhances antioxidant enzyme activity, and inhibits chlorophyll-degradation. Postharvest Biology and Technology. 116: 98-104.

  22. Singh, A.P., Dixit, G., Kumar, A., Mishra, S., Singh, P.K., Dwivedi, S., Trivedi, P.K., Chakrabarty, D., Mallick, S., Pandey, V. and Dhankher, O.P., (2016). Nitric oxide alleviated arsenic toxicity by modulation of antioxidants and thiol metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science. 6: 1272.

  23. Tian, X.R. and Lei, Y.B. (2007). Physiological responses of wheat seedlings to drought and UV-B radiation. Effect of exogenous sodium nitroprusside application. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 54: 676-682.

  24. Wang, L., Zehir, A., Sadowska, J., Zhou, N., Rosenblum, M., Busam, K. and Hameed, M. (2015). Consistent copy number changes and recurrent PRKAR1A mutations distinguish M elanotic S chwannomas from M elanomas: SNP  array and next generation sequencing analysis. Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer. 54(8): 463-471.

Editorial Board

View all (0)