Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Identifying Donors for Anaerobic Germination Tolerance and Direct Seeded Rice Cultivation by Exploring Seed and Seedling Traits

A. Vinitha1, D. Vijayalakshmi1,*, M. Raveendran2, V. Ravichandran1, T. Parthipan3
1Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-64 1003, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Agriculture Research Station, Kattuthotam-631 501, Thanjavur, India.

Background: Anaerobic conditions in waterlogged soil affect germination rate significantly reducing rice yields. Under wet direct seeded condition, only limited availability of rice genotypes are suitable for anaerobic germination. So, there is an urgent need to identify rice genotypes for enhanced germination even under anoxic stress.

Methods: Experiment was conducted in glass house, Department of Crop Physiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. In this study, 22 rice germplams with three replications were evaluated for seed and seedling traits underlying anaerobic germination tolerance. Main aim of this study is to explore the starch and sugar relation under anoxic stress and identifying tolerant genotypes for direct seeded rice cultivation.

Result: Tolerant genotypes had early emergences, higher shoot and root length along with higher starch degradation and sugar accumulation under waterlogged condition. Cluster analysis revealed that Karuppukavuni, Kalanamak, CBMAS 14065 and Kodavilayan were identified as tolerant genotypes and suitable for wet direct seeded rice cultivation. Finally higher starch degradation coupled with higher accumulation of glucose and fructose were the key traits underlying anaerobic germination tolerance in tolerant genoytpes. Shoot length, root length and sucrose contents had higher genotypic coefficient of variance, phenotypic coefficient of variance coupled with high heritability indicating scope for enhancing anaerobic germination tolerance.

Rice is the second largest cereal crop in the world and worlds total rice production comes from Asia with a productivity of 510 million tonnes (Rauf et al., 2019). Shortage of water, labour and high input makes rice production more expensive, less profitable and unsustainable (Farooq et al., 2011). In India now a day’s farmers are slowly adapting direct seeded rice (DSR) technology by broadcasting dry seeds (Sandhu et al., 2021).
       
In Tamil Nadu especially Cauvery delta zones, nearly 3- 4 lakh acres of land are cultivated under DSR technology (Ganeshmoorthy et al., 2014). Anaerobic germination (AG) is the major limiting factor for large scale adoption of DSR (Ghosal et al., 2019). Anaerobic germination followed by shoot and root length plays a significant role in providing yield stability and adaptability under DSR (Sandhu et al., 2016). AG tolerant genotypes responds in such a way that rice shoot develops quickly to reach surface of water allowing oxygen to get transported to underwater tissues. For tolerant genotypes faster and longer coleoptile growth under submergence acts as a major morphological adaptation (Hsu and Tung, 2017). Low O2 conditions affects sugar and starch metabolism by altering glucose and fructose contents (Kogawara et al., 2014).
       
Existing rice varieties are not speciûcally developed for direct-seeded ecosystems. Earlier rice varieties exhibited yield decline under direct seeded conditions. Varieties such as Sahbhagi dhan, DRR 42, DRR 44, CR dhan 201, CR dhan 203 and Swarna Shreya (Sandhu and Kumar, 2017) were developed by International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and genomics-assisted derived CR dhan 801 varieties have become highly popular in India. In Tamil Nadu, landraces namely Kallurundaikar, Sivapuchithiraikar and Kuruvaikalanjiyam showed higher grain yield under dry direct seeded condition in Paramakudi (Muthuramu and Ragavan, 2022). Till date no landraces are reported to show tolerance under wet direct seeded conditions.
       
Under anaerobic condition, there is an urge to study the seed and seedling traits underlying anaerobic germination tolerance. Hence, this study was aimed with the following objectives (i) To screen the available landrace diversity of Tamil Nadu for anaerobic germination tolerance. (ii) To evaluate the seed and seedling traits in the contrasting rice genotypes to anaerobic germination tolerance. (iii) To identify the anaerobic germination tolerant rice genotypes for further field evaluation.
Plant material and growth conditions
 
Was estimated seeds of 22 rice genotypes studied were sourced from the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore. Experiment was conducted (May to October, 2022) in glass house of Department of Crop Physiology, TNAU, Coimbatore. For both control and anaerobic germination, flooding tank (2.45 meter height, 1.57 meter width and 2.70 meter length)was used. The soil was a clay loam. Seed dormancy was broken by incubating the seeds at 50°C for one day prior to sowing. The control tank was allowed to water at regular interval to maintain thin film of water. To induce anaerobic condition, water level maintained at 15cm above the soil surface for 21 days. Seeds were allowed to germinate inside the submerged conditions. The water level in the flooding tank was observed daily morning and evening to maintain a 15 cm water level. All the genotypes were replicated thrice. Germination percentage was recorded at the end of the experiment. The number of seeds with emerged coleoptile and radicle were counted and expressed as percentage of the total number of seeds germinated to total number of seeds sown. After 6th day seeds were taken for analysis of starch content, sugar fractions and seedling traits. Moreover the germination percentage was calculated at end of the experiment (21 days after germination).
 
Measurements on seedling morphology
 
Shoot length (cm)
 
The length of the shoot was measured from the point of attachment on the seed to the tip in cm and the average was worked out.
 
Root length (cm)
 
The root length of the five random seedlings per replicant was measured from the point of attachment on the seed to the root tip in cm and the average was calculated.
 
Measurement of starch and sugar fractions
 
Starch determination
 
500 mg of rice seeds were heated with 80% ethanol for sugar removal from sample. Samples were centrifuged and 5.0 ml of water and 6.5 ml of 52% perchloric acid were added to the residues. The contents were centrifuged. 0.2 ml of the supernatant was pipetted out and made up to 1 ml with water. Add 4 ml of anthrone reagent was added and the contents were heated for 8 mins. OD measured at 630 nm (Critchley et al., 2001).
 
Sucrose and fructose content
 
was estimated as per the procedure of Yaliang et al., (2020). 0.1 ml sample extract was mixed with 50 μl 2 N NaOH in a test tube and the tube was placed in water bath for 5 min followed by addition of 0.7 ml 30% HCl, 0.2 ml 0.1% of resorcinol. OD value was measured at 480 nm to estimate sucrose content. To calculate. Fructose content 0.1 ml of sample was taken in a test tube and 0.2 ml of 0.1% resorcinol and 0.7 ml water was added and kept in water bath at 80°C for 10 min. OD value was measured at 480 nm. For glucose content, 4 mL enzyme mixture (10 mg O-dianisidine, 10 mg peroxidase and 0.1 mL glucose oxidase dissolved in 100 mL of 0.1 mol/L acetic acid buffer) was added to 2 mL supernatant and the mixture was heated at 30°C for 5 min followed by addition of and 8 mL of 10 mol/L sulphuric acid to terminate the reaction. Finally OD was taken at 505 nm (Yaliang et al., 2020).
 
Statistical analysis
 
Experiment was designed as completely randomized design. Genetic parameters were performed by TNAUSTAT- statistical package. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to identify significant difierences between the treatments. Statistical analysis and correlation were performed by GRAPES 1.0.0 software (General R-shiny based Analysis Platform Empowered by Statistics). Cluster analysis was performed by R studio version 4.3.0.
To evaluate the seed and seedling traits in rice genotypes
 
Germination percentage
 
Early emergence is important during AG condition. Anaerobic stress decreases the germination percentage. Thavalakannan, Mapillai samba, Vellimuthu, Kothamalli samba, Karuppukavuni, Kodavilayan, CBMAS 14065 and Kalanamak showed all the seeds were germinated under stress (Table 1). Highest germination was observed in Karuppukavuni (100%) followed by CBMAS 14065 and Kalanamak (97.5%), Kodavilayan (95%) under anoxic condition. TKM13 and Anna R4 had germination percentage of 82.5 and 82.5 respectively under AG (Table 1). Tolerant genotypes had higher seed germination even under anoxic stress condition. Similar results were reported by Yang et al., (2021). Germination rate was directly related to anaerobic seedling establishment under wet DSR (Yang et al., 2021).
 

Table 1: Genetic variability for seed and seedling growth traits in rice seeds germinated under anaerobic conditions.


 
Shoot and root length
 
Development of high yielding rice genotypes under wet DSR required certain morpho-physiological traits. Shoot length and root length have been found to relate with rice root adaptation and tolerance in AG conditions (Sandhu et al., 2016). Shoot length and root length are important and basic parameters under anaerobic stress conditions. Tolerant genotypes namely Karuppukavuni, Kalanamak, CBMAS 14065, Vellimuthu and Kodavilayan had higher shoot length of 28.19 cm, 27.02 cm, 25.53 cm, 23.62 cm and 24.97 cm respectively compared to other genotypes. Moderately tolerant genotypes viz., TKM13, Anna R4 and Varappukudainchan recorded shoot length of 12.27 cm, 11.18 cm and 10.70 cm respectively (Table 1). The shoot length was significantly increased in tolerant genotypes. Similar findings were observed in rice by Sandhu et al., (2016).
       
Long-term anoxic stress vanquishes growth and physiological activities of rice roots causing a dramatic decrease in root activity. Root length of tolerant genotypes ranged from 13.86 cm to 9.85 cm and 12.60 cm to 7.95 cm under control and AG conditions respectively. Similar results were reported by Liu et al., (2023). Moderately tolerant genotypes had root length of 10.97 cm to 4.02 cm under AG conditions (Table 1). Highest root length of 12.60 cm was observed in Kalanamak and followed by Karuppukavuni (12.51 cm) while, minimum root length was recorded in Rasagadam (4.02 cm) and CO53 (4.33 cm) under AG conditions (Table 1). Moderately tolerant genotype showed 12.94% to 49.43% reduction in root length compared to highly tolerant genotype. Cao et al., (2020) stated that under hypoxia stress, tolerant genotypes exhibits lower reduction of root length. Shoot and root length variables are closely related and positively correlated (Fig 4), similar to the reports of Miro et al., (2017).
 
Starch, glucose, fructose and sucrose contents
 
The major source of energy for seed germination and seedling growth is degradation of stored starch in seeds (Damaris et al., 2019). Starch is a key nutrient and major component that affects germination. Tolerant genotypes namely Vellimuthu, Karuppukavuni, CBMAS 14065, Kalanamak and Kodavilayan showed decreased starch contents of 8.52, 6.71, 7.01, 7.18 and 7.42 µmole/g FW respectively when measured after 6 days of anaerobic stress conditions compared to control. Starch degradation in rice seeds is a major mechanism related to submergence tolerance (Loreti et al., 2016). Starch values of 7.04 and 7.67 µmole/g FW were recorded in TKM13 and Anna R4 respectively under AG environment (Fig 1a). Percentage of starch breakdown was higher in tolerant genotypes (13.12% to 37.11%) compared to moderately tolerant genotypes (5.7% to 22.92%). For survival, starch utilization tends to be significant in AG stressed rice seeds (Loreti et al., 2018). All the seed quality traits were positively inter correlated and contributed towards anaerobic germination tolerance (Fig 4). Glucose and fructose content showed opposite trends as that of starch content.
 

Fig 1: Genetic variability for starch (a) and glucose (b) contents in rice seeds subjected to anaerobic stress.


       
Sugar availability plays a pivotal role in energy production under anoxic conditions as reported by Loreti et al., (2016). Glucose and fructose level was higher with decreased sucrose levels in coleoptiles of all rice genotypes under AG compared to normal condition (Fig 1a and 1b). At AG conditions, Karuppukavuni, CBMAS 14065, Kalanamak and Kodavilayan had higher glucose content (45.90, 43.97, 44.46 and 44.93 µmole/g FW) and fructose content (37.58, 36.59, 38.50 and 37.15 µmole/g FW) compared to normally grown seeds (Fig 1b). During germination, mixture of glucose and fructose is formed as a result of starch degradation (Muralikrisha and Nirmala, 2005). On the other hand, TKM13, Varappukudainchan and Anna R4 recorded lower glucose content (41.99, 41.71 and 43.07 µmole/g FW) and fructose content (37.41, 36.13 and 38.40 µmole/g FW) compared to tolerant genotypes under AG conditions (Fig 2a). Rough and brown rice showed increment in reducing sugars during germination (Moongngarm and Saetung 2010). Enhancement in reducing sugar plays a significant role in AG tolerance.Thus, AG tolerant genotypes degrade starch contents into soluble sugars at a faster rate.
 

Fig 2: Genetic variability for fructose (a) and sucrose (b) contents in rice seeds subjected to anaerobic stress.


       
Anaerobic stress generally decreased the sucrose contents. Sucrose degradation was faster in tolerant genotypes compared to moderately tolerant genotypes. Tolerant genotypes recorded lower sucrose levels of 15.22 µmole/g FW in Karuppukavuni while, higher level of 33.32 µmole/g FW in Vellimuthu under AG. In moderately tolerant genotypes, less sucrose content of 19.37 µmole/g FW was observed in TKM13 while, Norungan recorded 36.19 µmole/g FW of sucrose under AG environment (Fig 2b). Similar results were found on the report of Magneschi and Perata (2009) who stated that sucrose catabolism is an adaptive way to channeling sucrose into AG metabolism in rice and maize crops under anoxia conditions. During seed germination sucrose is the major source for embryo development that is consumed in large scale by tolerant lines compared to moderately tolerant genotypes. Due to these reasons, tolerant landraces under AG stress catabolise sucrose into glucose and fructose contents.
 
Correlation and cluster analysis of physiological traits under AG conditions
 
Based on variations, 22 rice genotypes were clubbed into three clusters using R studio. Under AG conditions cluster technique clearly defines the clusters on basis of seed and seedling parameters (Fig 3). The results of cluster analysis showed that, cluster 1 (Highly tolerant genotypes) included Karuppukavuni (4), Kalanamak (12), Kodavilayan (13) and CBMAS 14065 (10) genotypes. TKM 13 (15), Anna R4 (21), Manvilayan (8), Kallurundai samba (14), Nootripathu (11), Mapillai samba (4), Kothamalli samba (7), Nijavara (1), Adukkan (3), Vellimuthu (5), Thavalakannan (2), Kunjoanju (6) were grouped in cluster 2 (Moderately tolerant genotypes). Six genotypes namely Kullakar (22), CO53 (19), Rasagadam (20), Varappu kudainchan (18), Aanaikomban (16) and Norungan (17) were grouped in cluster 3 (Moderately sensitive genotypes) (Fig 3). Inter traits correlation was also confirmed by correlation graph. Highly positive correlation was showed between shoot length, root length, glucose and fructose content with germination percentage (Fig 4). Starch and sucrose showed negative correlation with germination percentage under AG stress (Fig 4). All the physiological traits have contributed to tolerance in AG conditions. Similar results were supported by Miro et al., (2017).
 

Fig 3: Hierarchical cluster analysis using seed and seedling traits under anaerobic condition.


 

Fig 4: Correlation of seed and seedling traits associated with anaerobic germination tolerance.


 
Variability, heritability and genetic advance
 
Always genotypic coefficient of variance (GCV) was found lower than phenotypic coefficient of variance (PCV) for seed and seedling traits (Table 2). Due to less influence of environmental characters, difference between PCV and GCV was less for all the traits. Minimum difference of GCV and PCV were observed in germination percentage, shoot length, root length, starch and glucose contents (Table 2). Thus, the selection on these traits might be effective in bringing significant genetic enhancement. Highest heritability was observed in shoot length (91.785%), root length (97.297%) and sucrose content (80.919%) under AG stress. Genetic advance per cent as mean were recorded higher in shoot length (31.344%), root length (28.030%) and sucrose content (18.376%) under anoxic condition. Similar results were reported by Beena et al., (2021) in rice genotypes subjected to heat stress. Results revealed that, higher GCV, PCV coupled with high heritability was noticed for the traits viz., shoot length, root length and sucrose concentrations. Thus, these traits might be useful as selection criterion for screening anaerobic germination tolerance. 
 

Table 2: Genetic parameters of rice genotypes under anaerobic germination.

Rice cultivation under direct seeded condition is economical and eco-friendly. Under AG growth traits like shoot length and root length swap away in opposite direction showing significant relation with seedling establishment. Tolerant genotypes namely Karuppukavuni, Kalanamak, CBMAS 14065 and Kodavilayan had greater starch degradation and sucrose catabolism accompanied with higher glucose and fructose compared to moderately tolerant genotypes under submerged condition. Hence, these seed traits can be used as an index to screen rice genotypes for anaerobic germination tolerance.
The authors were grateful to Department of Crop Physiology for providing necessary facilities for the work and experimental needs. My sincere thanks to chairperson Dr. D. Vijayalakshmi for her guidance and support. Dr. M. Raveendran, Director of Research, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University is highly acknowledged for providing rice seeds for the experiment.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

  1. Beena, R., Veena, V., Jaslam, M.P.K., Nithya, N. and Adarsh, V.S. (2021). Germplasm innovation for high-temperature tolerance from traditional rice accessions of Kerala using genetic variability, genetic advance, path coefficient analysis and principal component analysis. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 24(5): 555-566.

  2. Cao, X., Wu, L., Wu, M., Zhu, C., Jin, Q. and Zhang, J. (2020). Abscisic acid mediated proline biosynthesis and antioxidant ability in roots of two different rice genotypes under hypoxic stress. BMC Plant Biology. 20(1): 1-14.

  3. Critchley, J.H., Zeeman, S.C., Takaha, T., Smith, A.M. and Smith, S.M. (2001). A critical role for disproportionating enzyme in starch breakdown is revealed by a knock out mutation in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 26(1): 89-100.

  4. Damaris, R.N., Lin, Z., Yang, P. and He, D. (2019). The rice alpha- amylase, conserved regulator of seed maturation and germination. International J. of Molecular Sci. 20(2): 450.

  5. Farooq, M., Siddique, K.H., Rehman, H., Aziz, T., Lee, D.J. and Wahid, A. (2011). Rice direct seeding, experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil Till. Res. 111: 87-98.

  6. Ganeshamoorthy, R., Humphreys, E., Rajendran, R., Ravi, V., Mussgnug, F., Kumar, V., Chauhan, B.S., Ramesh, T., Kamboj, B.R., Gathala, M.K. and Malik, R. (2014). Guidelines for Dry Seeded Rice (DSR): in the Cauvery Delta Zone, Tamil Nadu, India/Sudhir Yadav and others.

  7. Ghosal, S., Casal, C., Quilloy, F.A., Septiningsih, E.M., Mendioro, M.S. and Dixit, S. (2019). Deciphering genetics underlying stable anaerobic germination in rice, phenotyping, QTL identification and interaction analysis. Rice. 12: 50.

  8. Hsu, K. and Tung, C.W. (2017). RNA-seq analysis of diverse rice genotypes to identify the genes controlling coleoptile growth during submerged germination. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 8: 1-15.

  9. Kogawara, S., Yamanoshita, T., Norisada, M. and Kojima, K. (2014). Steady sucrose degradation is a prerequisite for tolerance to root hypoxia. Tree Physiology. 34(3): 229-240.

  10. Liu, J., Jiajia, W., Tianhai, Z., Meng, L., Huimin, Y., Qiuyuan, L., Yunfei, W., Xin, J. and Quanzhi, Z. (2023). Exogenous Melatonin Positively Regulates Rice Root Growth through Promoting the Antioxidant System and Mediating the Auxin Signaling under Root-Zone Hypoxia Stress. Agronomy. 13(2): 386.

  11. Loreti, E., Van Veen, H. and Perata, P. (2016). Plant responses to fiooding stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 33: 64-71.

  12. Loreti, E., Valeri, M.C., Novi, G. and Perata, P. (2018). Gene regulation and survival under hypoxia requires starch availability and metabolism. Plant Physiology. 176(2): 1286-1298.

  13. Magneschi, L. and Perata, P. (2009). Rice germination and seedling growth in the absence of oxygen. Annals of Botany. 103(2):  181-196.

  14. Miro, B., Longkumer, T., Entila, F.D., Kohli, A. and Ismail, A.M. (2017). Rice seed germination underwater: Morpho- physiological responses and the bases of differential expression of alcoholic fermentation enzymes. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 8: 1857.

  15. Moongngarm, A. and Saetung, N. (2010). Comparison of chemical compositions and bioactive compounds of germinated rough rice and brown rice. Food Chem. 122(3): 782-788.

  16. Muralikrishna, G. and Nirmala, M. (2005). Cereal á-amylases-an overview. Carbohydrate Polymers. 60(2): 163-173.

  17. Muthuramu, S. and Ragavan, T. (2022). Ammi analysis for yield and stability in direct seeded rainfed rice. Bangladesh J. of Botany. 51(3): 469-475.

  18. Rauf, M., Choi, Y.M., Lee, S., Lee, M.C., Oh, S. and Hyun, D.Y. (2019). Evaluation of anaerobic germinability in various rice subpopulations: Identifying genotypes suitable for direct-seeded rice cultivation. Euphytica. 215: 1-15.

  19. Sandhu, N. and Kumar, A. (2017). Bridging the rice yield gaps underdrought, QTLs, genes and their use in breeding programs. Agronomy. 7: 27.

  20. Sandhu, N., Raman, K.A., Torres, R.O., Audebert, A., Dardou, A., Kumar, A., et al. (2016). Rice root architectural plasticity traits and genetic regions for adaptability to variable cultivation and stress conditions. Plant Physio. 171: 2562-2576.

  21. Sandhu, N., Yadav, S., Catolos, M., Cruz, M.T.S. and Kumar, A. (2021). Developing climate-resilient, direct-seeded, adapted multiple-stress-tolerant rice applying genomics-assisted breeding. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 12: 637488.

  22. Yaliang, W., Yikai, Z., Qinghua, S., Huizhe, C., Jin, X., Guohui, H., Yanhua, C., Xiaodan, W.,  Junke, W. and Zihao, Y. (2020). Decrement of sugar consumption in rice young panicle under high temperature aggravates spikelet number reduction. Rice Sci. 27(1): 44-55.

  23. Yang, Q., Luo, Y., Wang, H., Li, J., Gao, X., Gao, J. and Feng, B. (2021). Effects of germination on the physicochemical, nutritional and in vitro digestion characteristics of flours from waxy and nonwaxy proso millet, common buckwheat and pea. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Tech. 67: 102586.

Editorial Board

View all (0)