Morphological characterization of Phylloplane bacteria
Ten isolates collected from Cauvery Delta Region of Tamil Nadu showed two different morphological characters. Circular, Pale yellow, Convex, Slimy and Glistening colony Produced by PB1, PB3, PB6, PB7, PB9 bacteria. In further studies they are identified as a
Pseudomonas fluorescens. Round, white, Opaque, flat medium sized colony with serrated margin produced by PB2, PB4, PB5, PB8, PB10 are identified as a
Bacillus subtilis (Table 1).
The results are accordance with
Manasa et al., (2017). They reported that all
P.
fluorescens developed small to medium, smooth, glistening colonies, out of the 15 isolates 6 isolates showed yellowish green colour with light green pigmentation and the remaining isolates showed dull white colonies with no pigmentation.
Meera and Balabaskar (2012) and
Suman (2015) also found similar results, yellowish slimy colonies with fluorescent pigment production by
P.
fluorescens. The results are further confirmed with
Priyanka et al., (2017). They reported round to irregular yellow fluorescent coloniesproduced by
P.
fluorescens.
Lu et al. (2018) reported that
B.
subtilis produce gray-white, round, opaque, flat and dry with medium-size colonies on nutrient agar medium. The results are accordance with
Joo et al., (2007) which confirms that white coloured, circular and flat appearance colonies produced by
B.
subtilis.
Biochemical characterization of Phylloplane bacteria
Results obtained from various biochemical test was presented in Table 2. Phylloplane bacterial isolates PB1, PB3, PB6, PB7, PB9 produced positive results in pigment production, gelatin liquefaction, KOH test, H2S production test, casein hydrolysis, IAA production test, HCN production test, catalase test, glucose utilization, sucrose utilization, urease activity. They produce negative result in gram staining, starch hydrolysis, methyl red test, lactose utilization, maltose utilization.
Phylloplane bacterial isolates PB2, PB4, PB5, PB8, PB10 Produced positive result in gram staining, starch hydrolysis, gelatin liquefaction, casein hydrolysis, IAA production test, HCN production test, Catalase test, glucose utilization, sucrose utilization. Negative results were obtained in pigment production, Methyl red test, KOH test, H2S test, Urease activity, Lactose utilization and Maltose utilization.
The results of biochemical tests compared with Bergey’s manual of Determinative Bacteriology. PB1, PB3, PB6, PB7, PB9 were identified as
P.
fluorescens and PB2, PB4, PB5, PB8, PB10 were identified as
B.
subtilis. Several earlier workers
viz.,
Thalhun et al., (2017), Prabhukarthikeyan et al., (2015) ,
Kumar et al., (2014), Rajashekhar et al., (2017)and Rajasekar et al., (2019) also reported similar such results in their respective experiments.
In vitro effect of Phylloplane Bacteria (PB) against the growth of B. oryzae (Dual culture)
In the present investigation, among ten isolates of Phylloplane bacteria PB 5 (
B.
subtilis) showed the maximum inhibition of mycelial growth of
B.
oryzae (70.00%) with a inhibition zone of 13 mm followed by PB1 (
P.
fluorescens). The isolate PB1 inhibited the mycelial growth of
B.
oryzae upto 67.77 % with a inhibition zone of 11.50 mm. The lowest percentage of inhibition (31.11%) was observed in PB9 (
P.
fluorescens) (Table 3). Similarly,
Rajasekar et al., (2019) reported the antifungal activity of Rice Associated Phyllosphere (RAP) communities with twenty phylloplane bacterial isolates tested against
B.
oryzae. Among the twenty isolates
B.
subtilis (PI5) showed the maximum inhibition (52.96%) followed by
P.
fluorescens (PI1) with 52.59 % inhibition over control.
Balabaskar et al. (2016) also reported that
P.
fluorescens was found to be more antagonistic to
B.
oryzae as it recorded the maximum percent inhibition (75.22%) which was followed by
S.
marcescens (72.78%) and
B.
subtilis (70.56%) in the decreasing order of merit. Similarly,
Harish et al., (2015) recorded that in dual culture technique
P.
fluorescens inhibited the radial growth of
H.
oryzae.
Nayak and Hiremath (2019) also reported
P.
fluorescens registered significantly maximum mycelial inhibition (62.75%) followed by
B.
subtilis (51.76%). The bacteria
P.
fluorescens and
B.
subtilis inhibited the pathogen growth by competing with them for nutrient and space and produced antibiotic substances like DAPG, iturin which proved pathogen growth inhibition. Cellulolytic and chitinolytic enzymes produced by phylloplane bacteria may also acted against the pathogen
(Kohl et al., 2019).