Effect of nitrogen levels and spacing on plant height (cm)
Height of plant is very essential production component due to the photosynthetic activity. The average plant height of stevia for all the treatments are shown in Table 1. At 80 DAT, the maximum plant height (51.24 cm) was observed in the treatment 100 kg ha
-1 N at 50 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
9).
Increased plant height in the following treatments might be due to higher availability of nutrients and spaced required by each plant to grow faster. The results are in harmony with those reported by
Taleie et al., (2012) and
Inugraha et al., (2014).
Effect of nitrogen levels and spacing on SPAD value
Soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value indicates the amount of chlorophyll present in the plant leaves which is related to the condition of the plant and thus can be used to determine when additional fertilizer is necessary. Observations regarding response of spacing and levels of nitrogen on SPAD value of stevia is presented in Table 1.
The effect of the treatment on SPAD value was found to be non-significant. The results underline that in stevia there is a lack of correlation between Nitrogen level and SPAD value (chlorophyll content). SPAD value is directly proportional to the amount of chlorophyll present in leaf.
Effect of nitrogen levels and spacing on Number of leaves, Leaf area and LAI
Nitrogen levels and spacing had significant influence on the number of leaves, leaf area, leaf area index and it could be clearly noticed from Table 2. Leaf is the economic part hence, production of more leaf is the main aim of stevia performance. At harvest, significantly maximum number of leaves (342.52 plant
-1) was observed in treatment 100 kg ha
-1 N at 40 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
8).
Rashid et al., (2015) also mentioned that more no. of leaves is the result of more no. of branches per plant. The results are in accordance with the findings of
Aladakatti et al., (2012) and
Maheswar (2005) who reported increased number of leaves per plant with higher N levels.
Leaf area is governed by number of leaves per plant and size of leaves and it plays a vital role for plant growth and crop yield. The leaf area, being the most important yield determinant and is greatly influenced by different row to row spacing. Increase in leaf area with increase in spacing might be due to the fact that with increase in spacing there was more space for growth of the plant as compared to closer spacing. Maximum leaf area is obtained when sufficient amount of sunlight is just able to pass through the canopy.
At harvest, highest leaf area (4596.99 cm
2 plant
-1) was noticed in treatment 100 kg ha
-1 N at 50 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
9). The results are in conformity with those of
Rashid et al., (2015). The higher dose of nutrient levels increased the leaf area compared to lower dose. This could be attributed to the enhanced availability of nutrients at the appropriate time which have increased the number of leaves as well as leaf area. These results are also in consonance with the findings of
Chalapathi et al., (1999) in
Stevia rebaudiana.
Significant interaction occurred between the treatments on leaf area index at harvest and the maximum LAI (7.30) was observed in treatment 100 kg ha
-1 N at 30 cm x 20 cm spacing (T
7), whereas the minimum LAI (3.70) was observed in treatment 50 kg ha
-1 N at 50 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
3). Increasing nitrogen level increases LAI and LAI was significantly higher when stevia was planted at (30 cm × 20 cm). The present findings lend to support from the results of
Kumar et al., (2014).
Effect of nitrogen levels and spacing on yield attributing parameters
The data on yield attributing parameters are presented in the Table 3.
Fresh biomass yield
Levels of nitrogen significantly affected fresh biomass yield under different planting geometry. Highest fresh biomass yield (24.35 t ha
-1) was obtained in treatment 100 kg ha
-1 N at 30 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
7).
The results of present study is in accordance with the findings of
Btru et al., (2017) and
Kumar et al., (2014) who concluded that maximum fresh above ground biomass yield per hectare at closer spacing than the wider spacing in Stevia.
Fresh leaf yield
The results showed that fresh leaf yield was much influenced under various treatments at harvest. Treatment 100 kg ha
-1 N at 30 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
7) gave higher fresh leaf yield (10.54 t ha
-1) and the lowest fresh leaf yield (5.15 t ha
-1) was observed under treatment 50 kg ha
-1 N at 50 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
3) among various treatments. The results are in line with findings of
Lokesh et al., (2018).
Fresh leaf to stem ratio
A perusal of data revealed that highest leaf to stem ratio (0.78) was recorded in treatment 75 kg ha
-1 N at 30 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
4). The results corroborate findings of
Aladakatti et al., (2012). Kumar et al., (2012) reported leaf to stem ratio of (0.73) with application of 100:60:50 kg/ha of NPK.
Harvest index
Treatment (T
4), 75 kg ha
-1 N at 30 cm × 20 cm spacing showed highest harvest index (43.67%) and lowest harvest index (39.33%) was recorded under treatment (T
1), 50 kg ha
-1 N at 30 cm × 20 cm spacing.
The possible reason for lowering harvest index may be due to the less amount nutrient supplied which results in lower leaf yield which is the economic part of stevia because of lower translocation of photosynthates. The results are in conformity with the findings of
Aladakatti et al., (2012).
Total soluble solids of stevia
At 40, 60, 80 DAT and at harvest treatment 100 kg ha
-1 N at 30 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
7) demonstrated significantly highest TSS (8.8
oBx), (14.83
oBx), (18.33
oBx) and (18.73
oBx) is presented in Table 4. However, the least value of TSS was noted in treatment 50 kg ha
-1N at 50 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
3). High amount of TSS was recorded with treatment (T
7), this could be due to production of greater number of photo synthetically active leaves because of adequate supply of nitrogen nutrient. This might have lead to higher metabolic activity, resulting in increased production of carbohydrate and ultimately increased TSS. The results are in conformity with Cheena (2004).Similar reports were reported by
Kapuriya et al., (2017) who opined that increasing planting geometry reduces TSS content.
Energetic of stevia
Different treatments were assessed under energy parameters and data regarding the same is presented in Table 5, which significantly affected due to different spacing and levels of nitrogen.
Data revealed that the maximum energy input (28.38 × 10
3 MJ ha
-1), energy output (81.5 × 10
3 MJ ha
-1), net energy (53.14 × 10
3 MJ ha
-1) was observed under treatment 100 kg ha
-1 N at 30 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
7) and the lowest value of energy input (21.89 × 10
3 MJ ha
-1), energy output (41 × 10
3 MJ ha
-1), net energy (19.10 × 10
3 MJ ha
-1) was observed under treatment 50 kg ha
-1 N at 50 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
3).
The highest energy ratio (3.04) was noticed under treatment 75 kg ha
-1N at 30 cm × 20 cm (T
4) spacing and lowest ratio (1.79) was noticed under treatment 75 kg ha
-1N at 50 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
6).
However, maximum specific energy (5.56 MJ/kg) was observed under treatment 75 kg ha
-1N at 50 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
6) and minimum specific energy (3.28 MJ/kg) was noticed under treatment 75 kg ha
-1N at 30 cm × 20 cm spacing (T
4). The similar findings have been also reported by
Pahalvan et al., (2012) and
Hedau et al., (2014).