Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 31 issue 1 (march 2011) : 66 - 69

A STUDY ON ATTITUDE OF FARMERS TOWARDS MULBERRY SERICULTURE IN UDAIPUR DISTRICT OF RAJASTHAN

Ruchira Shukla, O.P. Sharma*
1Institute of Agribusiness Management (IABM) *Department of Extension Education, NM College of Agriculture Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari-396 450, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Shukla Ruchira, Sharma* O.P. (2024). A STUDY ON ATTITUDE OF FARMERS TOWARDS MULBERRY SERICULTURE IN UDAIPUR DISTRICT OF RAJASTHAN. Agricultural Science Digest. 31(1): 66 - 69. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A survey of seventy sericulturists was conducted using personal interview method in two tehsils of Udaipur district of Rajasthan to assess their attitude towards sericulture. It was found that majority (58.57 per cent) of sericulturists had favourable attitude towards sericulture. The overall attitude was favourable (pooled mean= 3.794). Statements” farmers can utilize their lean period for sericulture” and “ sericulture has come as a real boon to the farmers” were given first and second rank respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. Kumaresa, P. and Vijayaprakash, N.B. (2001). Indian J. Sericulture, 40 (2): 142-146.
  2. Kushwaha, K.S. (1964).Uni. Udaipur Res.Studies, 2:136-137.
  3. Kushwaha, K.S. and Verma, M. B. (1976). Uni. Udaipur Res.Studies, 4: 94-100.
  4. Shashi (1986). A study on acceotance of mulberry sericulture by farm families in Udaipur region. M. Sc. Thesis (Unpublished), Sukhadua University, Udaipur, pp181.
  5. Thruston, L.L. (1946). Ameri. J. Sociol. 39-40.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)