Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Agricultural Science Digest
Print ISSN: 0253-150X
Online ISSN: 0976-0547
NASS Rating
5.52
SJR
0.176
CiteScore
0.357

Chief Editor:
Arvind kumar
Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural Uni., Jhansi, U.P., INDIA
Frequency:Bi-monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossR...

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 32 issue 4 (december 2012) : 326 - 328

EVALUATION OF ONION VARIETIES FOR GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY TRAITS UNDER AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF KYMORE PLATEAU REGION OF MADHYA PRADESH, INDIA

Y.C. Dwivedi, S.S. Kushwah*, S.K. Sengupta
1Department of Horticulture, J.N. Agric. University, Jabalpur-482 004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Dwivedi Y.C., Kushwah* S.S., Sengupta S.K. (2025). EVALUATION OF ONION VARIETIES FOR GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY TRAITS UNDER AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OF KYMORE PLATEAU REGION OF MADHYA PRADESH, INDIA. Agricultural Science Digest. 32(4): 326 - 328. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Eight improved cultivars viz; VL-1, VL-3, Arka Niketan, Arka Kalyan, Pusa Red, Pusa White flat, Pusa Hybrid 107 and Pusa Hybrid 102 were tested in a randomized block Design with four replications for two years to study their performance under agro-climatic conditions of Jabalpur (M.P.). The results revealed that variety Pusa Hybrid 102 recorded significantly highest yield along with maximum plant height, number of leaves/plant, width of bulb, weight of bulb and dry matter content. Variety Pusa White flat produced bulb yield next to it with highest TSS content. Remaining varieties Pusa Red, VL-3, Arka Niketan, Pusa Hybrid 107, VL-1 and Arka Kalyan exhibited bulb yield in decreasing order.

REFERENCES

  1. Aghora, T.S. and Pathak, C.S. (1991). Heterosis and combining ability in a line x tester cross of onions. Veg. Sci. 18(1) : 53-58.
  2. AOAC (1960). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of official analytical chemists. Washington D.C. 8th Edition.
  3. Bhonde, S.R., Shrivastava, K.J. and Pandey, U.B. (1992). Evaluation of varieties for growing “Rangda” crop of onion (Allium cepa L.) in Nasik area of Maharshtra. Maharshtra J. Hort. 6(2) :39.
  4. Deka, B.C., Bora, G.C., Baruah, S.N. and Shadeque, A. (1994). Yield and quality performance of some onion varieties. J. Agric. Sci. Soc. North-East India. 7(2): 162-164.
  5. Mohanty, B.K. and Prusti, A.M. (2000). Assessment of onion cultivars for horticultural traits in Orissa during Kharif season. JNKVV, Res. J. 34 (1 & 2) : 20-24.
  6. NHB (2010). Indian Horticulture Database-(2009). National Horticulture Board, Govt. of India, Gurgaon. www.nhb.org
  7. Patil, D.R., Hebbara, M. and Naganagoud, A. (1991). Performance of onion varieties on black soils. Karnataka J. Agril. Sci. 4(1-2) : 54-56.
  8. Sharma Sucheta, Bal, S.S. and Bajaj, K.L. (1996). Chemical composition of some important varieties of onion. Veg. Sci. 23(1) : 45-51.
  9. Singh Attar and Korla, B.N. (1991). Effect of transplanting dates and varieties on number of leaves and yield in onion. Veg. Sci. 18 (1) : 24-28.
  10. Yadav, V.S., Yadav S.S. and Sharma, Y.K. (2011). Evaluation of onion varieties for bulb yield and yield attributes. In: Souvenir & Abstract “National Symposium on Alliums: current scenarion and emerging trends” Organised from 12-14 March, by Indian Soci. Alliums at DOGR, Rajgurunagar, Pune p135.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)