Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 32 issue 4 (december 2012) : 296 - 300

EFFICACY AND ECONOMICS OF VARIOUS PEST MANAGEMENT MODULES AGAINST TOMATO FRUIT BORER, HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUBNER)

S.M. Chavan*, Sushilkumar1, S.S. Arve
1N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari-396 450, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Chavan* S.M., Sushilkumar1, Arve S.S. (2024). EFFICACY AND ECONOMICS OF VARIOUS PEST MANAGEMENT MODULES AGAINST TOMATO FRUIT BORER, HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUBNER). Agricultural Science Digest. 32(4): 296 - 300. doi: .
The field experiment was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of various pest management module against tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari with an objective to test the efficacy of different pest management modules with their economics and effect on larval population and fruit infestation. The results revealed that IPM module was found most promising in reducing larval population (1.04/plant), fruit infestation (15.35%) and increasing yield (36445 kg/ha). The insecticidal module was equally effective in reducing larval population (1.09/plant), fruit infestation (16.33%) and increasing yield (34684 kg/ha) as compared to IPM module. The biological module (1.13 larvae/plant, 20.19% infested fruit, 30813 kg/ha yield) was found next to insecticidal module, whereas botanical module (1.19 larvae/plant, 17.74% infested fruit, 30350 kg/ha yield) was next to biological module. The sole non-pesticidal module remained least effective. The net ICBR obtained in IPM module was 1:9.45 which was comparable with insecticidal module (1:15.92).
  1. Butani, D. K. (1977). Insect pest of vegetables-tomato. Pesticides, 11: 33-36.
  2. Devraj, K. and Nandihalli, B. S. (2002). Efficacy of neem seed kernel dusts on pupae of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Insect Environment, 8(3): 107-108.
  3. Divakar, B. J. and Pawar, A. D. (1987). Bio-control of tomato fruit borer, Heliothis armigera (Hb.) in Karnataka. Indian J. of Plant Protection, 15: 57-62.
  4. Mathur, R. P. and Singh, S. V. (1997). Integrated pest management strategies for vegetables. In : Integrated Pest Management in Agriculture (ed. Bharad, GM, Bonde, RS, Nimbalkar, SA and Sarode, SV) Dr. PDKV Akola, India. pp 130-142.
  5. Praveen, P. M. and Dhandapani, N. (2003). Development of biocontrol based pest management module in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum (Mill.). In Proc. of the Symposium of Biological Control of Lepidopteran pests, 17-18 July 2002, Banglore, India.
  6. Rana, B. S., Ashok Kumar, A. K., Vyas and Ameta, O. P. (2002). Efficacy of profenofos 50 EC against Helicoverpa armigera and its residue on tomato. Indian J. of Applied Ent., 16(1): 67-70.
  7. Sharma, S. and Krishnamurthy, G. (1998). Bioefficacy of some insecticides against insect pests of tomato. Pestology, 22(12): 34-36.
  8. Thakor, S. B. and Patel, I. S. (2008). Ovicidal toxicity of chemical and botanical insecticides on the eggs of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) in laboratory. Insect Environment, 13(4): 183-184.

Editorial Board

View all (0)