Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 32 issue 3 (september 2012) : 193 - 198

EFFECT OF LEVELS OF NITROGEN AND IRON ON YIELD OF GRAIN AMARANTH (Amaranthus hypochodriacus L.) UNDER DIFFERENT PLANTING TECHNIQUES

K.I. Patel, B.M. Patel*, S.J. Patel, P.T. Patel, S.M. Patel, P.M. Patel
1C.P. College of Agriculture S.D.A.U., Sardar Krushinagar-385 506, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Patel K.I., Patel* B.M., Patel S.J., Patel P.T., Patel S.M., Patel P.M. (2024). EFFECT OF LEVELS OF NITROGEN AND IRON ON YIELD OF GRAIN AMARANTH (Amaranthus hypochodriacus L.) UNDER DIFFERENT PLANTING TECHNIQUES. Agricultural Science Digest. 32(3): 193 - 198. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted during rabi seasons of 2007-08 and 2008-09 at the Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy, C. P. College of Agriculture, SDAU, Sardarkrushinagar. Among the planting techniques, line sowing recoded significantly higher plant height, length of main spikelets, number and length of lateral spikelets, grain and stover yield of amaranth. Line sowing resulted into 17.1%; 5.8% and 9.7%; 3.1% higher grain and stover yields, respectively over broadcasting and paired row methods of sowing. The yield and yield components of grain amaranths increased significantly under application of 60 kg N ha-1 and then decreased gradually as crop received higher proportion of N than RDN (60+40 kg NP ha-1). Iron application did not exert any significant response, though higher yield and yield attributed were recoded under 10 kg FeSO4 ha-1 application. Highest net income (Rs. 34130 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (3.83) was associated with, 60 kg N ha-1 with 10 kg FeSO4 under line sowing

REFERENCES

  1. Annapurna M.L., Mushtari Begum, J., Dhanpal, G.N., Shamshad Begum, S. and Jyothi, G. (2001) . Grain amaranth and rice bean nutria-rich products, Division of Rural Home Science, UAS, Hebbal, Bangalore. pp.1.
  2. Director of Agriculture (2009). Area, Production and Yield per hectare of important food and non-food crops in Banaskantha district. pp. 18.
  3. Gutte, A.V. and Karanjikar, P.N.(2007). Effect of plant densities and fertilizer levels on growth and yield of sweet sorghum. Asian J. Soil Sci. 2:150-152.
  4. Henderson, T.L., Johnson, B.L. and Schneiter, A.A. (2000). Row spacing, plant population and cultivar effects on grain amaranth in the Northern Great Plains. Agron., J. 92:329-336.
  5. Kushawaha, B.B., Gautam, V.S., Kushwaha, S.S. and Sinha, N.K.(2003). Studies on the effect of micronutrients on sorghum production. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 18(1-2):48-52.
  6. Modhawadia, J.M.(2004). Effect of sowing time, spacing and nitrogen levels on yield and quality of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.) under south SaurashtraAgroclimatic Zone. M.Sc. (Agri.) thesis submitted to GAU, Junagadh.
  7. Myers, R.L. (1998). Nitrogen fertilizer effect on grain amaranth. Agron. J., 90(5) : 597-602.
  8. National Research Council (1984). Amaranth Modern Prospects for Ancient Crop. National Academic Press, Washington,
  9. D.C., USA. pp.80.
  10. Nehra, O. P. (2000). Response of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.) to irrigation and nitrogen application. Haryana J. Agron., 16 : 174-175.
  11. Panse, V.G and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Stistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)