Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Agricultural Science Digest, volume 20 issue 1 (march 2000) : 1-4

GENETIC VARIABILITY FOR ALLOGAMIC TRAITS IN BARLEY (HORDEUM VULGARE L.)

S.K. Gupta, Dalvir Singh, S.C. Sharma
1Department of Plant-Breeding, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar-125004, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Gupta S.K., Singh Dalvir, Sharma S.C. (2024). GENETIC VARIABILITY FOR ALLOGAMIC TRAITS IN BARLEY (HORDEUM VULGARE L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 20(1): 1-4. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Eighteen pollen parents of barley were grown In a randomized block design with three replications to study the variability in anther length (mm), anther extrusion (anthers/spikelet) and pollen viability wlt~ln anther (%). The antherlength varied from 2.06 (RD2503) to 3.31 mm (BH331). BH85, BH326, Clipper  and PL172 had anther length of more than 3.00 mm. BH 342, the check variety had the highest anther extrusion of 2.21 anthers/spikelet, while PL 172 recorded
the lowest anther extrusion of 0.11 anthers/spikelet. The other pollen parents having desirable anther extrusion were BH 326 (1.10 anthers/spikelet) and BH 75 (1.04 anthers/spikelet). The range of viable pollen after 1/2 an hour was from 98.42 to 100.00 per cent which reduced to 80.24 to 89.45 per cent after 4 hours at temperature from 19.2"C to 23.8"C and relative hl.DJlidity 71 to 75 per cent.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Ahokas, H. (1979). £uphytica 28 : 409-419.
    2. Aholas.H. (1982). Barley Genet. Newsleft. 12 : 20-28.
    3. Battan. K.R. et al.. (1997). Ann. Agri. Bia. Res. 2 : 27-30.
    4. Beri, S.M. and Anand, S.C. (197)). Euphytica 20 : 327-332.
    5. DSouza, L. (1970). Z. PfJ. Zucht. 63 246-249.
    6. !lilrnmer, K. (1976). Tag Ber Akad Landwirtsch Wiss DDR. 143 221-226
    7. 4 AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE DIGES,
    8. Joppa, L. R. et al., (1968). Crop Sci. 8 : 487-490.
    9. Leliey, J. (1966). Zuchter 36 : 314-317.
    10. Lichte, H.F. (1957). Angew. Bot. 31 : 1-28.
    11. Nettevic, E.D. (1966). Sel. - Khoz. Bioi. 1966 :222-226. (PI. Breeding. Abstr. 37, 1967
    12. 337).
    13. Obermayer, E. (1916). Z. PflZucht. 4: 347-403.
    14. Oka, H.1. and Morishima, H. (1967). Evolution 21 249-258.
    15. Scholz, F. and Kunzel, G. (1987). Barley Genet. 50 : 937-943.
    16. Singh, P.P. (1992). Indian J. Genet. 52 : 347-349.
    17. Zukov, V.1. (1969). Selekts. Semenov. 1969 (6): 73 (PI. Breeding. Abstr. 40, 1970 4700).
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)