Banner

Chief Editor:
Arvind kumar
Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural Uni., Jhansi, U.P., INDIA
Frequency:Bi-monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossR...
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 20 issue 1 (march 2000) : 17-20

NATURAL ENEMY COMPLEX OF HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA HUBN. IN DURG

A.K. Mishra, S.K. Shrlvastava·
1Central Integrated Pest Management Centre, Raipur-492001, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mishra A.K., Shrlvastava· S.K. (2025). NATURAL ENEMY COMPLEX OF HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA HUBN. IN DURG. Agricultural Science Digest. 20(1): 17-20. doi: .
Population of gram pod borer Helieoverpa armigera (Hubn.) and their biological suppressing agents were studied at four places. Maximum pod borer population (10.8 ± 4,9 larvae/m2) was recorded at Bhendari followed by Chamari (9.8±3.1 larvae/m2). Natural enemy play a key role in population suppression of pod borer and during peak 52.7 to 90.1% parasitization were noticed in different location. Among natural enemy recorded, fungi, Beauvaria bassiana Balsamo and ichneumonid, Campoletis chlorideae Uchida were dominant and during their peak infectivity were ranged from 2.4± 1.8 to 5.0±4.0 infected larvae/m2 and from 1.8±1.0 to 4.0± 1.5 diseased larvae/m2 at different Eriborus sp. were minor in status.
    1. Bhatnagar, V.S. and Davies J.C. (1978). Cropping entomology. Progress Report 1977-78.
    2. ICRISAT, Patancheru A.P. India 30 pp.
    3. Diwakar, J. and Pawar, A.D. (1979). PI. Prot. Bu//. 31(1-4):112-117.
    4. Jaroslav, W. and Briggs, J. (1982). In:Microbial control of Insect and Mites (Ed. H.D. Burges
    5. and N.W. Hussey). Academic Press, London, 13-16pp.
    6. Natarajan, K. and Sundara Murthy, V.T. (1990). In: Proc.Natn. Workshop Heliothis management.
    7. TNAU Coimbatore. 216-222 pp.
    8. Sankaran, T. (1977) PANS; 23:371-378.
    9. Shrivastava, S.K. and Yadav, K.P. (1990). J. Appl. Zool. Res. 1:82-83.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)